PFD report

Mrs Marina May Raisbeck · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Feb 2025•Nottinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of a system for monitoring clinical parameters of urgent surgical patients awaiting transfer
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to safely coordinate transfer of urgent surgical patients
  2. Lack of a system for prioritisation of urgent surgical patients awaiting transfer
    Part of recurring concern: Delays in progressing time-critical surgical treatmentPart of recurring concern: Failure to safely coordinate transfer of urgent surgical patientsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Conduct daily face-to-face clinical assessments of surgical patients awaiting transfer to prioritise transfers and monitor blood tests.

    Stated by Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 May 2025.
  2. Action

    Discuss implementation of the tracking system with wider specialties for surgical patients.

    Stated by Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 May 2025.
  3. Action

    Tailor the tracking system to orthopaedic standards and complete its implementation.

    Stated by Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 May 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Implementation of surgical patient tracking is constrained by competing digital priorities and limited resources and capacity.

    Stated by Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a system for monitoring clinical parameters of urgent surgical patients awaiting transfer

Wider context from the report

“2. The lack of a system for monitoring clinical parameters of urgent surgical patients awaiting transfer to DRI from the Emergency Department at Bassetlaw District General Hospital ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to safely coordinate transfer of urgent surgical patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a system for prioritisation of urgent surgical patients awaiting transfer

Wider context from the report

“1. The lack of a system for prioritisation of urgent surgical patients awaiting transfer to DRI from the Emergency Department at Bassetlaw District General Hospital ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in progressing time-critical surgical treatment; Failure to safely coordinate transfer of urgent surgical patients; Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct daily face-to-face clinical assessments of surgical patients awaiting transfer to prioritise transfers and monitor blood tests.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To enhance this standard, the Trust has immediately implemented a new initiative in Bassetlaw Hospital whereby every morning a Surgical Advanced Clinical Practitioner will undertake a face to face assessment of all surgical patients awaiting transfer to Doncaster Royal Infirmary in order to prioritise transfer. This assessment will include a full clinical review including monitoring blood tests.”

Source location

Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
Page 1 · response
Published 19 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss implementation of the tracking system with wider specialties for surgical patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Meanwhile, further discussions with our wider specialties are commencing to implement the tracker for our surgical patients.”

Source location

Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 19 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Tailor the tracking system to orthopaedic standards and complete its implementation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Discussions are nearing completion with our orthopaedic team to tailor the tracking system to reflect their standards of care and implementation is expected to be complete within 3-6 months.”

Source location

Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 19 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and roll out a digital tracking system monitoring referred patients’ physiology, sepsis parameters and observations for clinical-team oversight and prioritisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has successfully developed a tracking system which provides oversight to the host and receiving clinical teams and monitors the patient’s physiology parameters (including sepsis) and observations. It also enables clinical teams to prioritise patient care. This digital programme of work has already been rolled out in Acute Medicine and Paediatrics on both Bassetlaw and Doncaster Hospital sites to allow them to easily view all patients in the ED that have been referred to them.”

Source location

Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 19 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implementation of surgical patient tracking is constrained by competing digital priorities and limited resources and capacity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Discussions are nearing completion with our orthopaedic team to tailor the tracking system to reflect their standards of care and implementation is expected to be complete within 3-6 months.”

Source location

Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 19 May 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Review the Trust Transfer Policy to formalise simultaneous transport and bed booking.

    Stated by Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 May 2025.
  2. 2

    Book transport and receiving-site beds simultaneously, transferring patients to the next available bed or to Emergency Department under specialty-team care if necessary.

    Stated by Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 May 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the Trust Transfer Policy to formalise simultaneous transport and bed booking.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In terms of transfers, historically, transport from Bassetlaw Hospital has been booked only when a bed is available on the Doncaster site. The Trust’s transfer process has been reviewed and transport and bed will now be booked at the same time; with the expectation that the patient would be transferred to the next bed available. On the rare occasion that a bed is not available on arrival at the Doncaster site, the patient will be transferred to ED under care of the specialty team.”

Source location

Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 19 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Book transport and receiving-site beds simultaneously, transferring patients to the next available bed or to Emergency Department under specialty-team care if necessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In terms of transfers, historically, transport from Bassetlaw Hospital has been booked only when a bed is available on the Doncaster site. The Trust’s transfer process has been reviewed and transport and bed will now be booked at the same time; with the expectation that the patient would be transferred to the next bed available. On the rare occasion that a bed is not available on arrival at the Doncaster site, the patient will be transferred to ED under care of the specialty team.”

Source location

Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 19 May 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026