PFD report

Derek BRIERLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Aug 2013•Manchester North

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Difficulties in locating suprapubic catheters before procedures
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable availability of urinary catheters for required care
  2. Suprapubic catheter insertion at an excessively high site
  3. Lack of Trust guidelines for competence and training in suprapubic procedures
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Implement urology training and competency sign-off for clinicians inserting suprapubic catheters outside urology.

    Stated by Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 December 2013.
  2. Action

    Label, regularly check and appropriately store suprapubic catheter procedure trays.

    Stated by Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 December 2013.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Procedure trays are clearly labelled, regularly checked and appropriately stored, so no change to tray arrangements is identified.

    Stated by Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Difficulties in locating suprapubic catheters before procedures

Wider context from the report

“3)Difficulties were encountered in locating a suprapubic catheter prior to the procedure ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable availability of urinary catheters for required care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Suprapubic catheter insertion at an excessively high site

Wider context from the report

“1) Although the consultant performing the suprapubic procedure had done so successfully on nine previous occasions the last such occasion was twelve months earlier. The family overheard instructions for the procedure being read out to the consultant whilst it was being carried out. More likely than not the site of the insertion was too high. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of Trust guidelines for competence and training in suprapubic procedures

Wider context from the report

“2) There are no Trust Guidelines as to the standard of competence or training of those carrying out the procedure ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure current competence for suprapubic procedures

Wider context from the report

“1) Although the consultant performing the suprapubic procedure had done so successfully on nine previous occasions the last such occasion was twelve months earlier. The family overheard instructions for the procedure being read out to the consultant whilst it was being carried out. More likely than not the site of the insertion was too high. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe assurance of doctors' procedural competence.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement urology training and competency sign-off for clinicians inserting suprapubic catheters outside urology.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3) The urology team have initiated a training program for those who may need to insert such catheters outside of the urology division. Individuals will need to be signed off for this, (a process we already use for chest drains).”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Label, regularly check and appropriately store suprapubic catheter procedure trays.

Verbatim wording from the response

“8) Procedure trays are clearly labelled, regularly checked & appropriately stored. Difficulty finding the kit in this case was due to individual lack of familiarity as it is not a procedure frequently performed in a very busy A&E.”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Procedure trays are clearly labelled, regularly checked and appropriately stored, so no change to tray arrangements is identified.

Verbatim wording from the response

“8) Procedure trays are clearly labelled, regularly checked & appropriately stored. Difficulty finding the kit in this case was due to individual lack of familiarity as it is not a procedure frequently performed in a very busy A&E.”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The difficulty locating the procedure kit resulted from individual unfamiliarity, not inadequate tray labelling, checking or storage.

Verbatim wording from the response

“8) Procedure trays are clearly labelled, regularly checked & appropriately stored. Difficulty finding the kit in this case was due to individual lack of familiarity as it is not a procedure frequently performed in a very busy A&E.”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Require discussion of suprapubic catheter cases with the urology team.

    Stated by Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStatus unclearThe respondent did not make the status of this action clear when they made their response on 30 December 2013.
  2. 2

    Monitor catheter-related incidents and ensure adverse incidents are reported as clinical incidents.

    Stated by Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 December 2013.
  3. 3

    Redraft the urinary-retention pathway, making suprapubic aspiration the first-line intervention and specifying transfer to urology or A&E when catheter insertion is unsuccessful.

    Stated by Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 December 2013.
  4. 4

    Require bladder scanning before attempting suprapubic catheter procedures.

    Stated by Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStatus unclearThe respondent did not make the status of this action clear when they made their response on 30 December 2013.
  5. 5

    Share the urinary-retention pathway with A&E staff and provide an opportunity for their comments.

    Stated by Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 December 2013.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require discussion of suprapubic catheter cases with the urology team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“6) Such cases should be discussed with the urology team. (This was done in this particular case).”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor catheter-related incidents and ensure adverse incidents are reported as clinical incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“7) The governance lead for urology will continue to monitor catheter related incidents to ensure standards & processes are followed, but also ensure that adverse incidents are reported as clinical incidents.”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Redraft the urinary-retention pathway, making suprapubic aspiration the first-line intervention and specifying transfer to urology or A&E when catheter insertion is unsuccessful.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1) The pathway for managing urinary retention has been re-drafted & supra-pubic aspiration is the first line intervention for those unable to insert supra-pubic catheters, followed by transfer to North Manchester Urology department or A&E. (Summary Pathway enclosed)”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require bladder scanning before attempting suprapubic catheter procedures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5) Bladder scanning should be done before such procedures are attempted. (This was actually done in this particular case).”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the urinary-retention pathway with A&E staff and provide an opportunity for their comments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2) The pathway has been shared with A&E staff so that they are aware of it (& they had opportunity to comment on it).”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026