Derek BRIERLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Aug 2013•Manchester North

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Difficulties in locating suprapubic catheters before procedures
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable availability of urinary catheters for required care
  2. Suprapubic catheter insertion at an excessively high site
  3. Lack of Trust guidelines for competence and training in suprapubic procedures

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

    Require discussion of suprapubic catheter cases with the urology team.

  2. Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

    Monitor catheter-related incidents and ensure adverse incidents are reported as clinical incidents.

  3. Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

    Redraft the urinary-retention pathway, making suprapubic aspiration the first-line intervention and specifying transfer to urology or A&E when catheter insertion is unsuccessful.

  4. Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

    Implement urology training and competency sign-off for clinicians inserting suprapubic catheters outside urology.

  5. Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

    Require bladder scanning before attempting suprapubic catheter procedures.

  6. Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

    Label, regularly check and appropriately store suprapubic catheter procedure trays.

  7. Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

    Share the urinary-retention pathway with A&E staff and provide an opportunity for their comments.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

    Procedure trays are clearly labelled, regularly checked and appropriately stored, so no change to tray arrangements is identified.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  2. Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

    The difficulty locating the procedure kit resulted from individual unfamiliarity, not inadequate tray labelling, checking or storage.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Difficulties in locating suprapubic catheters before procedures

Wider context from the report

“3)Difficulties were encountered in locating a suprapubic catheter prior to the procedure ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable availability of urinary catheters for required care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Suprapubic catheter insertion at an excessively high site

Wider context from the report

“1) Although the consultant performing the suprapubic procedure had done so successfully on nine previous occasions the last such occasion was twelve months earlier. The family overheard instructions for the procedure being read out to the consultant whilst it was being carried out. More likely than not the site of the insertion was too high. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of Trust guidelines for competence and training in suprapubic procedures

Wider context from the report

“2) There are no Trust Guidelines as to the standard of competence or training of those carrying out the procedure ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure current competence for suprapubic procedures

Wider context from the report

“1) Although the consultant performing the suprapubic procedure had done so successfully on nine previous occasions the last such occasion was twelve months earlier. The family overheard instructions for the procedure being read out to the consultant whilst it was being carried out. More likely than not the site of the insertion was too high. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe assurance of doctors' procedural competence.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require discussion of suprapubic catheter cases with the urology team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“6) Such cases should be discussed with the urology team. (This was done in this particular case).”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor catheter-related incidents and ensure adverse incidents are reported as clinical incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“7) The governance lead for urology will continue to monitor catheter related incidents to ensure standards & processes are followed, but also ensure that adverse incidents are reported as clinical incidents.”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Redraft the urinary-retention pathway, making suprapubic aspiration the first-line intervention and specifying transfer to urology or A&E when catheter insertion is unsuccessful.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1) The pathway for managing urinary retention has been re-drafted & supra-pubic aspiration is the first line intervention for those unable to insert supra-pubic catheters, followed by transfer to North Manchester Urology department or A&E. (Summary Pathway enclosed)”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement urology training and competency sign-off for clinicians inserting suprapubic catheters outside urology.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3) The urology team have initiated a training program for those who may need to insert such catheters outside of the urology division. Individuals will need to be signed off for this, (a process we already use for chest drains).”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require bladder scanning before attempting suprapubic catheter procedures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5) Bladder scanning should be done before such procedures are attempted. (This was actually done in this particular case).”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Label, regularly check and appropriately store suprapubic catheter procedure trays.

Verbatim wording from the response

“8) Procedure trays are clearly labelled, regularly checked & appropriately stored. Difficulty finding the kit in this case was due to individual lack of familiarity as it is not a procedure frequently performed in a very busy A&E.”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the urinary-retention pathway with A&E staff and provide an opportunity for their comments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2) The pathway has been shared with A&E staff so that they are aware of it (& they had opportunity to comment on it).”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Procedure trays are clearly labelled, regularly checked and appropriately stored, so no change to tray arrangements is identified.

Verbatim wording from the response

“8) Procedure trays are clearly labelled, regularly checked & appropriately stored. Difficulty finding the kit in this case was due to individual lack of familiarity as it is not a procedure frequently performed in a very busy A&E.”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The difficulty locating the procedure kit resulted from individual unfamiliarity, not inadequate tray labelling, checking or storage.

Verbatim wording from the response

“8) Procedure trays are clearly labelled, regularly checked & appropriately stored. Difficulty finding the kit in this case was due to individual lack of familiarity as it is not a procedure frequently performed in a very busy A&E.”

Source location

2013-0244-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2013

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026