PFD report

Mr Ronald Compson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Jan 2017•Black Country

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Poor communication with the family about falls
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to communicate safety-critical care information effectively between care providers and families
  2. Poor recording of vomiting episodes
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records
  3. Failure to contact the on-call doctor
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable contact arrangements for urgent clinical advice
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Complete a root cause analysis investigation into the failures concerning doctor contact, vomiting records, and family communication.

    Stated by the Dudley Group NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 June 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The investigation found no nerve centre system failure; the failure to contact a doctor resulted from human error entering incorrect patient details.

    Stated by the Dudley Group NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Poor communication with the family about falls

Wider context from the report

“3. There was poor communication to the family about the initial fall. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to communicate safety-critical care information effectively between care providers and families.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Poor recording of vomiting episodes

Wider context from the report

“2. There were two separate incidents of vomiting and poor record keeping of when these occurred. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to contact the on-call doctor

Wider context from the report

“1. Evidence emerged during the inquest that there was a failure to contact a Doctor and it isn’t clear if this was a system failure through the “nerve centre” system designed to inform the on call Doctor. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable contact arrangements for urgent clinical advice.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete a root cause analysis investigation into the failures concerning doctor contact, vomiting records, and family communication.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The important issues you raise have been taken very seriously and I enclose a summary of the Root Cause Analysis (RCA) investigation undertaken by the Trust regarding these. The investigation has shown that there was no nerve system failure identified, the failure to contact a doctor was as a consequence of human error due to the input of incorrect patient details into the system.”

Source location

2018-0030-Response-by-Dudley-Group-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 8 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The investigation found no nerve centre system failure; the failure to contact a doctor resulted from human error entering incorrect patient details.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The important issues you raise have been taken very seriously and I enclose a summary of the Root Cause Analysis (RCA) investigation undertaken by the Trust regarding these. The investigation has shown that there was no nerve system failure identified, the failure to contact a doctor was as a consequence of human error due to the input of incorrect patient details into the system.”

Source location

2018-0030-Response-by-Dudley-Group-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 8 June 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026