PFD report

Leigh William Wilde · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Mar 2018•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised6

  1. Lack of documentation setting out the rationale for suspension decisions
  2. Failure to consider and discuss risk at meetings
  3. Failure to retain notes of the meeting on 13th March
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of documentation setting out the rationale for suspension decisions

Wider context from the report

“• Leigh William Wilde had been suspended from his employment shortly before his death. There was no supporting documentation to set out the rationale for the decision. There was no evidence of risk factors or how to minimise them being considered when deciding whether to suspend an employee under the company policy. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider and discuss risk at meetings

Wider context from the report

“• There were no notes available for the meeting on 13th March or evidence of consideration/discussion of risk at that meeting. There was no evidence that he had been referred to or reminded of the support services available to him. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to retain notes of the meeting on 13th March

Wider context from the report

“• There were no notes available for the meeting on 13th March or evidence of consideration/discussion of risk at that meeting. There was no evidence that he had been referred to or reminded of the support services available to him. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a clear approach to whistleblowers and support for them

Wider context from the report

“• The approach of both LTE and IMI towards whistleblowers and support for them was unclear. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider risk factors and risk minimisation when deciding whether to suspend an employee

Wider context from the report

“• Leigh William Wilde had been suspended from his employment shortly before his death. There was no supporting documentation to set out the rationale for the decision. There was no evidence of risk factors or how to minimise them being considered when deciding whether to suspend an employee under the company policy. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable objective criteria for safety risk assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to refer employees to or remind them of available support services

Wider context from the report

“• There were no notes available for the meeting on 13th March or evidence of consideration/discussion of risk at that meeting. There was no evidence that he had been referred to or reminded of the support services available to him. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026