Ahmed Hassam Motala · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 May 2019•Gloucestershire

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to maintain the cycle lane in a safe condition
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to maintain roads, pavements and verges in a safe state of repair

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Gloucestershire County Council

    Resurface Cole Avenue, including planing and replacing the tarmac surface and cycle-lane surfacing, through the 2020/21 programme.

  2. Gloucestershire County Council

    Inspect Cole Avenue monthly and apply footpath-defect criteria to cycle lanes, with qualifying defects attended to.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Gloucestershire County Council

    The site currently has no actionable safety defects under the applicable safety defect criteria.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  2. Gloucestershire County Council

    Monthly key-route inspections and attendance to qualifying defects are considered sufficient until planned resurfacing.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain the cycle lane in a safe condition

Wider context from the report

“The evidence of the Police Collision Investigator and the evidence of witnesses who were motorists on the day (one who regularly used the cycle lane himself) describe the state of the cycle lane as being in very poor condition and cyclists have to swerve in the cycle lane to avoid the defects. Moreover I heard that to avoid the defects they cycle very close to the white line separating the lane with the traffic. This is obviously very dangerous. At the time of the impact, Mr Motala was not in a cycle lane, what is more the weather on that day was described as “diabolical”. Therefore I do not consider that the state of the cycle lane itself contributed to his death. However, I am concerned that lives of cyclists in the future may be put at risk if the cycle lane stays in the current state of repair. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain roads, pavements and verges in a safe state of repair.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Resurface Cole Avenue, including planing and replacing the tarmac surface and cycle-lane surfacing, through the 2020/21 programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our Safety Inspection Team have been out and assessed the site using our Safety Defect Criteria. At present there are no actionable safety defects, however the red surfacing that is sometimes used in cycle lanes to highlight their presence is starting to strip away. There is no quick fix for this issue and the lanes have to be planned out and fully resurfaced.”

Source location

2019-0168-Response-by-Gloucestershire-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 29 July 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inspect Cole Avenue monthly and apply footpath-defect criteria to cycle lanes, with qualifying defects attended to.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Cole Avenue is currently in our resurfacing programme for the next financial year 20/21, this will involve the tarmac surface and cycle lanes being planed out and new tarmac put in its place. Until this time, Cole Avenue will continue to be inspected as part of our key route inspections once a month and any defects that are present will be attended to. I have stressed the importance of picking any issues up in this location and the inspectors will now pick up any defects that meet the criteria for a footpath defect within the cycle lanes. This criteria is different to that of a carriageway and will highlight smaller defects.”

Source location

2019-0168-Response-by-Gloucestershire-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 29 July 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The site currently has no actionable safety defects under the applicable safety defect criteria.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our Safety Inspection Team have been out and assessed the site using our Safety Defect Criteria. At present there are no actionable safety defects, however the red surfacing that is sometimes used in cycle lanes to highlight their presence is starting to strip away. There is no quick fix for this issue and the lanes have to be planned out and fully resurfaced.”

Source location

2019-0168-Response-by-Gloucestershire-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 29 July 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monthly key-route inspections and attendance to qualifying defects are considered sufficient until planned resurfacing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Cole Avenue is currently in our resurfacing programme for the next financial year 20/21, this will involve the tarmac surface and cycle lanes being planed out and new tarmac put in its place. Until this time, Cole Avenue will continue to be inspected as part of our key route inspections once a month and any defects that are present will be attended to. I have stressed the importance of picking any issues up in this location and the inspectors will now pick up any defects that meet the criteria for a footpath defect within the cycle lanes. This criteria is different to that of a carriageway and will highlight smaller defects.”

Source location

2019-0168-Response-by-Gloucestershire-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 29 July 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026