PFD report

Mr Peter Lawrence (PL) · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 1 Jul 2019•Black Country

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Lack of a joint multidisciplinary and interagency care plan for responding to relapse indicators
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable multidisciplinary and interagency care planning for mental-health relapse
  2. Excessive reliance on mental health tribunal decisions in care planning
  3. Inadequate follow-up engagement and monitoring after discharge
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after discharge
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Formulate a joint action plan to improve multidisciplinary and multi-agency care plans and risk assessments for community patients with complex needs.

    Stated by Dudley Integrated Health and Care NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 9 September 2019.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a joint multidisciplinary and interagency care plan for responding to relapse indicators

Wider context from the report

“2. There was a lack of a joint multi-disciplinary/agency care plan (between Local authority and Mental Health Trust) which could have resulted in delays in a timely response to known relapse indicators. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable multidisciplinary and interagency care planning for mental-health relapse.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Excessive reliance on mental health tribunal decisions in care planning

Wider context from the report

“5. When PL was successful at the mental health tribunal and was discharged from Section 3 following his last admission to hospital in October 2017 against the view of the multidisciplinary team. The agencies involved placed too much reliance on this decision and follow up engagement and monitoring with PL reduced becoming inadequate. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate follow-up engagement and monitoring after discharge

Wider context from the report

“5. When PL was successful at the mental health tribunal and was discharged from Section 3 following his last admission to hospital in October 2017 against the view of the multidisciplinary team. The agencies involved placed too much reliance on this decision and follow up engagement and monitoring with PL reduced becoming inadequate. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after discharge.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide assertive care coordination for patients at risk of disengagement and relapse

Wider context from the report

“3. A more assertive approach with consistency of care coordinator for a patient with a history of disengagement and relapse could possibly have been implemented reducing the likelihood of disengagement with services and promoted necessary concordance with medication. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide continuity of patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to coordinate multidisciplinary review and mental health act assessment when considering hospital admission

Wider context from the report

“4. A decision to admit to hospital under the mental health act following concerns being raised about self-care and disengagement could potentially have followed a coordinated MDT review and mental health act assessment and prevented deterioration in his mental health. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure timely and appropriate Mental Health Act assessment; Inadequate mental health assessment before care decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Formulate a joint action plan to improve multidisciplinary and multi-agency care plans and risk assessments for community patients with complex needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has in conjunction with Walsall Council formulated a further joint action plan to ensure that policies and procedures relating to multidisciplinary/agency care plans and risk assessments meet the needs of community patients with complex needs and that a multi-agency working approach is reinforced going forward.”

Source location

2019-0245-Response-by-Dudley-and-Walsall-Mental-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026