PFD report

Neil Francis Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Mar 2024•Gwent

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
11

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to investigate in-patient falls
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risksPart of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Strengthen the Serious Incident process by appointing investigating officers before initial meetings, providing investigation training, and applying enhanced governance and approval of reports and action plans.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 March 2024.
  2. Action

    Use standardised Serious Incident agendas to define investigation scope, capture robust terms of reference, involve families from the outset and prompt reporting to external agencies.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 March 2024.
  3. Action

    Report inpatient falls through RLDatix and investigate falls causing fractures, with escalation through serious-incident and Duty of Candour processes where moderate or greater harm occurs.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 March 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to investigate in-patient falls

Wider context from the report

“The inquest was advised that a Falls Panel had been convened to determine, in part, whether action could have been taken to prevent a fall which had occurred on 23/04/23. I received no evidence that there had been any investigation into the other falls including, importantly, the fall on 01/05/23 that contributed to Mr Edwards’ death. The court regularly hears that investigations into the circumstances of in-patient falls is central to minimising the risk going forward. It is of concern that no such investigation was undertaken at this time. Additionally, as there was no investigation, the court was not reassured as to how deaths in similar circumstances might be prevented in the future. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen the Serious Incident process by appointing investigating officers before initial meetings, providing investigation training, and applying enhanced governance and approval of reports and action plans.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Health Board’s Serious Incident Process has been reviewed to improve the scrutiny of incidents. Serious Incident meetings are considered mandatory and investigating officers are now appointed in advance of the first meeting to ensure the investigating officer can be present and engaged from the outset. The Health Board has been delivering Investigating officer training since September 2020 which includes SIs and complaints. The workshops are half day workshops based and provide Investigating Officers with a range of methodologies to use in their investigations.”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 21 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use standardised Serious Incident agendas to define investigation scope, capture robust terms of reference, involve families from the outset and prompt reporting to external agencies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Improved and standardised agendas have been introduced as part of the SI process to ensure that the scope of investigation and robust terms of reference are captured and referred back to at the end of the process and this will include the involvement of patient families and any concerns they may have, from the outset. The standardised agenda includes a prompt to ensure reporting to external Agencies such as NHS Executive and the HSE.”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 21 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Report inpatient falls through RLDatix and investigate falls causing fractures, with escalation through serious-incident and Duty of Candour processes where moderate or greater harm occurs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Falls are reported via the Health Board’s incident reporting procedures, namely by completing an incident report via our electronic ‘RL Datix Incident’ reporting system. These reports are circulated to relevant staff and senior managers for review and action. Where any concerns are identified, consideration will then be given to the form and type of post fall investigation required. For cases identified where moderate harm or above, these will be managed in line with the Health Board’s”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 1 · response
Published 21 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a monthly Falls Review Panel to investigate injurious inpatient falls, identify learning, agree remedial actions and monitor fracture-related fall trends.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Health Board has a Falls Policy in place for Hospital Adult inpatients. The Falls Policy must be implemented at all levels within the organisation to ensure a safe and consistent approach is adopted. The aim is to reduce avoidable, injurious falls whilst ensuring appropriate management of patients who experience a fall, to include collaboration with intermediate care and the frailty programme.”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 1 · response
Published 21 March 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. 1

    Continue appointing Activity Co-ordinators across acute and community wards to provide meaningful activities suited to individual patient needs.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 March 2024.
  2. 2

    Deliver a bespoke education package and communications programme to support launch of the revised Person-centred Enhanced Care Framework.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 March 2024.
  3. 3

    Monitor implementation and impact of the revised Enhanced Care Framework, with Ward Managers accountable for compliance.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 March 2024.
  4. 4

    Undertake recurring acuity audits and staffing reviews, escalate staffing deficits, and report workforce and roster information to support safe nurse staffing decisions.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 March 2024.
  5. 5

    Operate Health-Roster and Safe-Care across the Health Board to monitor staffing, assess acuity and dependency, and redeploy staff to support enhanced-care requirements.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 March 2024.
  6. 6

    Implement the approved Nursing, Midwifery and SCPHN Workforce Strategy 2023–26 and progress its priority action plans.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 March 2024.
  7. 7

    Revise the Person-centred Enhanced Care Framework with updated assessment, care-planning, supervision, family-involvement and escalation requirements for patients needing enhanced observation.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 March 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue appointing Activity Co-ordinators across acute and community wards to provide meaningful activities suited to individual patient needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Positive progress is being made to appoint Activity Co-ordinators for all acute and community wards to ensure meaningful activities are encouraged appropriate to individual needs.”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 4 · response
Published 21 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver a bespoke education package and communications programme to support launch of the revised Person-centred Enhanced Care Framework.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The launch of the revised framework will be supported by a bespoke education package to ensure all staff fully understand the revised framework. A full communications programme will also take effect to ensure there is widescale awareness of the changes.”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 4 · response
Published 21 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor implementation and impact of the revised Enhanced Care Framework, with Ward Managers accountable for compliance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The implementation and impact of the changes to the framework will be monitored closely to ensure optimal patient experience and safety. Ward Managers will be accountable for ensuring the revised framework is followed.”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 4 · response
Published 21 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake recurring acuity audits and staffing reviews, escalate staffing deficits, and report workforce and roster information to support safe nurse staffing decisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In line with the Nurse Staffing Levels (Wales) Act 2016 the Health Board undertakes a bi-annual audit of patient acuity which informs a recalculation of nurse staffing levels. Any changes outside the bi-annual audit to the purpose of a ward, requires an additional recalculation. By way of assurance Board receives the outcome of the recalculations on an annual basis. Significant investment into nurse staffing levels has been secured since the inception of the Act.”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 5 · response
Published 21 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate Health-Roster and Safe-Care across the Health Board to monitor staffing, assess acuity and dependency, and redeploy staff to support enhanced-care requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to support safe nurse staffing levels, the Health Board has implemented Health-Roster & Safe-Care across the Health Board. This is a digital platform which gives nurses the visibility of staffing levels across wards and departments, allowing them to maintain safe and compliant patient care based on patient numbers, acuity and dependency. It supports day-to-day operational changes to the roster in real time, facilitating the redeployment of staff to support enhanced care”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 4 · response
Published 21 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the approved Nursing, Midwifery and SCPHN Workforce Strategy 2023–26 and progress its priority action plans.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A Nursing, Midwifery and SCPHN Workforce Strategy 2023-26 was approved by the Board in May 2023. Positive progress has been made against the priority action plans aligned to the strategy.”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 5 · response
Published 21 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise the Person-centred Enhanced Care Framework with updated assessment, care-planning, supervision, family-involvement and escalation requirements for patients needing enhanced observation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Health Board has recently (May 2024) revised and updated the Person-centred Enhanced Care Framework. Lessons learned from patient safety incidents, feedback and audits have informed the revised framework. The main focus of the revised framework is to ensure patients receive the”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 21 March 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026