PFD report

JOHN EDWARD BRYNMOR PHILLIPS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Jun 2026•Devon, Plymouth and Torbay

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to prevent or clearly identify automatic deactivation of an active SystmOne patient record by access from a previously involved organisation
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable access to relevant clinical records for safe care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Share the investigation findings and learning with relevant health and justice organisations, highlighting the need to avoid inappropriate record re-registration.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 August 2026.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The events were attributed to human error rather than a systemic SystmOne issue.

    Stated by NHS EnglandDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to prevent or clearly identify automatic deactivation of an active SystmOne patient record by access from a previously involved organisation

Wider context from the report

“The national SystmOne electronic patient record operates in an unsafe way because it appears to allow a patient’s record to be accessed (which might be for a necessary administrative reason) by a member of staff in an organisation previously involved in the patient’s care, which seems to have the automatic effect of deactivating the patient’s active record in an organisation currently involved in the patient’s care (and associated appointments, tasks, treatment plans etc), without this being obvious to anyone – this leads to the removal of important and current tasks, referrals and appointments for the patient whilst they are being cared for by the current organisation and will likely result in unsafe clinical care being provided by NHS Trusts. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to relevant clinical records for safe care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the investigation findings and learning with relevant health and justice organisations, highlighting the need to avoid inappropriate record re-registration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to ensure that all healthcare providers are aware of this investigation and any learning, we will be sharing the findings with the NHS England Regional Health and Justice Commissioning Teams, the Welsh Health Board and HMP Parc. We will highlight to them that when accessing the records of a patient who has left a prison, healthcare staff are mindful of the movement of records and not requesting the re-registering of the patient that is no longer a resident in that prison.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 21 August 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The events were attributed to human error rather than a systemic SystmOne issue.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Once a patient has transferred between prisons and their SystmOne record is accessed for purposes such as updating, it does not automatically pull the patient and records back to the previous site when they are accessed. A request to re-register the patients record is required for this. If the re-register request is made, the deactivation or deactivation of the record at the “new” prison then takes place. This appears to be what happened in this case and was human error, not an automatic process. We therefore do not believe that the events in this tragic case were due to a systemic issue within SystmOne.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 21 August 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Record movement does not affect patients’ clinical care or treatment plans.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To further reassure you, this does not impact on clinical care and treatment plans. Once the request to correct the re-registration is made, the patient’s records remain as they were and are unaffected by this movement of their clinical record.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 21 August 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Share the case findings, information and learning with the Health and Justice Delivery Oversight Group.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 August 2026.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the case findings, information and learning with the Health and Justice Delivery Oversight Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the findings, information and any learning from this case will be shared with NHS England’s Health and Justice Delivery Oversight Group (HJDO). The HJDOG is the senior leadership forum, which holds responsibility for the oversight of delivery and continuous improvement in Health and Justice commissioned services, through both national and regional teams. All health and justice related Reports to Prevent Future Deaths are shared with HJDOG members, and assurance is sought from regions where learning and action is identified.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 21 August 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026