PFD report

Lamont Ashley Roper · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Sep 2023•North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
7

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
14

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised7

  1. Failure to ensure officers know that the MPS dive team can attend submerged-person incidents when not on call or at night
  2. Failure to ensure safe cycling patrols and pursuits near bodies of water
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe police operations near bodies of water
  3. Failure to manage the safety of cycle patrols near bodies of water
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe police operations near bodies of water
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.11

  1. Action

    Provide throw-line access for officers conducting pre-planned operations near bodies of water.

    Stated by Metropolitan Police ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 October 2023.
  2. Action

    Refresh cycle training, maintain deployment records, and prohibit operational cycling without current training.

    Stated by Metropolitan Police ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 October 2023.
  3. Action

    Brief current and new pan-London control-room supervisors on Dive Team capacity and call-out procedures.

    Stated by Metropolitan Police ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 October 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.6

  1. Position

    Throw lines in marked emergency vehicles are considered to mitigate cycle patrol officers’ lack of immediate access to rescue equipment.

    Stated by Metropolitan Police ServiceExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure officers know that the MPS dive team can attend submerged-person incidents when not on call or at night

Wider context from the report

“4. The Coroner makes a recommendation to the MPS to ensure that its officers are made aware the MPS dive team can attend a critical incident involving someone submerged in water even when the team are not on call and / or at night, and that this possibility should therefore be explored at an early stage. This may be achieved by special training and the publication of an operational notice. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure safe cycling patrols and pursuits near bodies of water

Wider context from the report

“7. The Coroner recommends to the MPS that they provide specific training about cycling, whether during a pursuit or otherwise, near to the bodies of water in particular as there is a serious risk of future deaths occurring as a result of MPS cycle patrols and pursuits at up to 15mph [on electric bicycles] near bodies of water. The Coroner recommends that specific policies and training are put in place to ensure that such pursuits are undertaken safely and in a manner such as to mitigate risks of accidents or injury. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe police operations near bodies of water.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to manage the safety of cycle patrols near bodies of water

Wider context from the report

“2. If this not possible to source alternative water rescue equipment that can be carried by officers on cycle patrol, then the family considers that the risks of cycle patrols near to bodies of water outweighs the benefits. The Coroner recommends in the alternative that the MPS amends their policies and training to reflect the fact that cycle patrols alongside bodies of water are potentially very dangerous more so in the absence of water rescue equipment and that in these circumstances careful consideration to continuing the patrol will need to be undertaken at a senior level . ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe police operations near bodies of water.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of suitable water rescue equipment for officers patrolling near bodies of water

Wider context from the report

“1. The Coroner recommends to the MPS that they consider whether there is any alternative and less cumbersome water rescue equipment [to throw lines] that could be issued to officers on patrol near bodies of water, for example some sort of device which could be inflated quickly and thrown to the person in the water to assist them in floating until a throw line is available. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable emergency water-rescue procedures and equipment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide throw lines on all marked emergency vehicles

Wider context from the report

“5. The Coroner recommends that [throw lines] must be available and issued to all MPS marked emergency vehicles. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable emergency water-rescue procedures and equipment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to factor water rescue equipment availability into dynamic patrol risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“3. The coroner recommends to the MPS to implement a requirement for officers conducting pre-planned operations along stretches of a canal or other bodies of water to make themselves aware of the availability (or non-availability) of water rescue equipment in order for this to be factored into their ongoing dynamic risk assessment whilst on patrol” ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable emergency water-rescue procedures and equipment; Unreliable objective criteria for safety risk assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient number of qualified divers available to police

Wider context from the report

“6. The Coroner makes a recommendation that steps should be taken to increase the number of qualified divers available to the police to assist with the respond to an incident. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable emergency water-rescue procedures and equipment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide throw-line access for officers conducting pre-planned operations near bodies of water.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Officers either specifically tasked with patrols by bodies of water, or part of planned operations, are required to have a throw line available to them. This may extend to access from a nearby vehicle.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Refresh cycle training, maintain deployment records, and prohibit operational cycling without current training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following this incident, at the beginning of 2022 the MPS reviewed and refreshed its cycle training and now maintains training and resourcing records, for the deployment of officers and staff who have received this training. From April 2023, officers and staff are not permitted to cycle operationally without this current training.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 6 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Brief current and new pan-London control-room supervisors on Dive Team capacity and call-out procedures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• All current and new Met Grip Chief Inspectors (pan London Control Room supervisors) are briefed by the Dive Team on their capacity and call out procedure. The last course took place at the beginning of September 2023.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 4 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Route every body-of-water incident to the Marine Unit Duty Officer for assessment of possible out-of-hours Dive Team call-out.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• All incidents involving people in a body of water is now brought to the attention of the 24/7 Marine Unit Duty Officer by the Incident Room. The Marine Unit Duty Officer will review the incident and assess if there is a possibility of a Dive Team call out during out of hours. Discussions will be had with the incident commander around the tactical options and implement any call out if required.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 4 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish and disseminate the Open Water Rescue and Recovery Guide explaining Dive Team call-out procedures and contact arrangements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In June 2022, an e-mail was sent to all MPU officers confirming the Dive Team’s capability and availability.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 4 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue reviewing and assessing police dive-team size against threat, harm, risk, and demand.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The MPS Taskforce Command constantly review and assess team sizes based on the threat, harm and risk balanced with the demand. At this time, the assessment is that there is sufficient police dive team capacity to meet its demand.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 5 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Incorporate Dive Team capacity and call-out training into the MPS Leader’s Programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Until recently, all police inspectors’ promotion training courses had a Dive Team input to upskill new and current inspectors around capacity and call out procedure. From 2024, this input will be incorporated into the new MPS Leader’s Programme.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 5 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver local cycle training covering pursuits, pursuit procedures, and risks of cycling near bodies of water.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Training is delivered locally by trainers who have attended a Central Trainer’s Course on each Basic Command Unit/Operational Command Unit who in turn will train their officers and staff. The training includes a specific input about pursuits and an understanding of the MPS Pursuits Standard Operating Procedures is covered as part of the cycle training. Advice to officers and staff using cycles near to bodies of water is covered in the MPS patrolling risk assessments.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 6 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require Basic Command Units to establish management arrangements for deploying, using, and maintaining throw lines.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Basic Command Units are to establish system management for the deployment, use and maintenance of throw lines.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain the updated MPS Water Intervention Risk Assessment addressing risks from water and water entry.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The MPS Water Intervention Risk Assessment was reviewed and updated at the end of 2021 to outline the risk water and water entry pose. Additional measures include:”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with water-rescue stakeholders to consider viable future technologies for police officers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the MPS Public and Personal Safety Unit (“PPSU”) has scoped the current marketplace to ascertain if there are any viable alternatives that would offer carriage of water rescue equipment on the person. No product has currently been identified which would overcome the issues previously outlined, i.e. the cumbersome product design and weight that would have to be additionally factored in. The PPSU will continue to work with stakeholders with key responsibilities in water rescue, to consider the viability in the use of future technologies for use by police officers in such circumstances.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 2 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Throw lines in marked emergency vehicles are considered to mitigate cycle patrol officers’ lack of immediate access to rescue equipment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The circumstances of cycle patrol are the same as those of general patrol duties, in that they are not planned taskings or operations. Throw lines are now available in all marked emergency vehicles which mitigates the risk of officers on foot or cycle patrols having ready access to this provision.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The existing police dive team is assessed as having sufficient capacity to meet demand.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The MPS Taskforce Command constantly review and assess team sizes based on the threat, harm and risk balanced with the demand. At this time, the assessment is that there is sufficient police dive team capacity to meet its demand.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 5 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The RNLI, London Fire Brigade and UK Coastguard have the relevant expertise and responsibilities for water rescue.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Other agencies, such as the RNLI, LFB and the UK Coastguard have the relevant expertise and responsibilities in water rescue.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 5 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Officers on pre-planned operations near water are already required to have access to throw lines under the Water Intervention Risk Assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As above, officers conducting pre-planned operations along bodies of water, are now required to have access to throw lines which is covered in the MPS Water Intervention Risk Assessment.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No viable wearable water-rescue equipment alternative has been identified because product weight and cumbersome design remain barriers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the MPS Public and Personal Safety Unit (“PPSU”) has scoped the current marketplace to ascertain if there are any viable alternatives that would offer carriage of water rescue equipment on the person. No product has currently been identified which would overcome the issues previously outlined, i.e. the cumbersome product design and weight that would have to be additionally factored in. The PPSU will continue to work with stakeholders with key responsibilities in water rescue, to consider the viability in the use of future technologies for use by police officers in such circumstances.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 2 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Marine Policing Unit is not responsible for rescuing people in difficulty in water.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to the Coroner’s matter of concern, whilst it is not the responsibility of the MPS Marine Policing Unit to rescue persons who are in difficulty in water, officers will seek to identify water rescue equipment which is easily accessible when such spontaneous incidents arise or when patrolling near bodies of water. This includes throw lines, which are retained in every MPS marked emergency vehicle.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 2 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Ensure officers know rescue-aid locations through local briefing packages disseminated across Basic Command Units.

    Stated by Metropolitan Police ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 October 2023.
  2. 2

    Require Basic Command Units to review geographic areas, identify water-related events, and establish local event risk assessments.

    Stated by Metropolitan Police ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 October 2023.
  3. 3

    Deliver mandatory throw-line training video instruction and assess officers’ competence, with remedial training for failures.

    Stated by Metropolitan Police ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 October 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure officers know rescue-aid locations through local briefing packages disseminated across Basic Command Units.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Basic Command Units are to ensure officers are aware of locations of rescue aids / life-saving equipment whilst ensuring local briefing packages are in place and disseminated throughout the Basic Command Unit.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require Basic Command Units to review geographic areas, identify water-related events, and establish local event risk assessments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Basic Command Units are to review their geographic areas in order to identify any known water related / mass participation events and activities with local risk assessments to be in place for identified events.”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver mandatory throw-line training video instruction and assess officers’ competence, with remedial training for failures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Furthermore, in the most recent Public and Personal Safety Training (“PPST”) delivered to over 21,500 officers between April 2023 and October 2023, officers were required to view a mandatory”

Source location

Response from Metropolitan Police Service
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026