Investigation and inquest
On 19 May 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Christopher Richard ALLUM aged 36. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 08 November 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was that:
Christopher Richard Allum died as a result of suicide.
Circumstances of the death
Christopher Richard Allum had a history of escalating mental health issues from March 2022.
On 26 March 2022 he attended A&E ████████. He reattended hospital on 28 March 2022 after a further incident of deliberate self-harm ████████. He presented to hospital again on 29 March with suicidal ideation and a further incident of deliberate self-harm.
On 23 April 2022 whilst in a ward setting, Christopher ████████ in an attempt to be suspended. Christopher was later discharged and on 9 May 2022 he disclosed to mental health professionals that he ████████. He was admitted to hospital and on 13 May 2022 he disclosed to a member of staff that he had ████████. These previous incidences were recorded in Christopher’s care notes. Christopher was admitted to the Langford Centre on 14 May 2022. His risk of suicide and self-harm was rated as high at the time of admission. The referral paperwork received by the Langford Centre made reference to the previous incidences of cutting and drinking of corrosive substances but did not mention ligatures. Christopher’s care notes were not accessed by staff at the Langford Centre until after his death. There was no record of Christopher arriving at the Langford Centre with a belt, nor any record of a belt being within his possession nor taken from him at any stage.
On the evening of 15 May 2022, Christopher was found unresponsive in his room ████████
████████
Paramedics were called and CPR was attempted, however, it was not possible to revive Christopher and death was confirmed at 23:01.
Coroner’s concerns
Initial referral - there seems to be a gap at the initial referral and admission stage in obtaining information about and recording previous methods of self-harm and suicide. There also appears to be a gap in the seeking and recording of relevant information from an individual's family at the point of referral and admission. An individual's family is often able to provide detailed and useful information about events that may not have been previously reported and/or be able to bridge the gap in communications between various health agencies involved in someone's care.
Access to notes - the other concerning issue is the difficulty prevalent within the private sector in accessing of NHS notes. It appears to be the position across the private sector that access to an individual's notes is not provided as standard. This means that there may be a significant gap in the information available when someone is admitted to a premises run by a private healthcare provider, even within an NHS allocated bed. This gap in information can have an impact on an individual's risk assessment and their subsequent care plan.