Bartholomew Patrick Coleman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Jul 2018•Dorset

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Easy public access to the railway track from the bridge
    Part of recurring concern: Ineffective controls preventing access to railway tracks
  2. Lack of warnings about the dangers of accessing the railway track
    Part of recurring concern: Ineffective controls preventing access to railway tracks

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Network Rail Infrastructure Limited

    Install wire mesh panels with base-plated fence posts on the parapet walls to deter access to the track.

  2. Network Rail Infrastructure Limited

    Erect a warning sign describing the dangers, Network Rail ownership and trespass prohibition.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Easy public access to the railway track from the bridge

Wider context from the report

“i. I understand children of school age cross the bridge to and from school. There is evidence to suggest that the area has been used by either groups or individuals to consume alcohol: there are discarded drinks containers in the area beyond the bridge and close to the train track. I am concerned that the railway track is easily accessible to members of the public from this bridge. In addition, there appears to be no warning as to the dangers presented by accessing this area. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective controls preventing access to railway tracks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of warnings about the dangers of accessing the railway track

Wider context from the report

“i. I understand children of school age cross the bridge to and from school. There is evidence to suggest that the area has been used by either groups or individuals to consume alcohol: there are discarded drinks containers in the area beyond the bridge and close to the train track. I am concerned that the railway track is easily accessible to members of the public from this bridge. In addition, there appears to be no warning as to the dangers presented by accessing this area. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective controls preventing access to railway tracks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install wire mesh panels with base-plated fence posts on the parapet walls to deter access to the track.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Noting your concerns identified in your report, and following the Network Rail staff site assessment, Network Rail is planning to apply mitigation measures (wire mesh panels with base plated fence posts fixed to the top of the parapet walls) to the parapet walls to further deter access to the track below. An order has now been placed with Network Rail’s framework contractors in respect of these works, with an anticipated completion date of the end September 2018. Network Rail will also erect a warning sign of the dangers presented and that the land belongs to Network Rail and therefore access beyond is trespass.”

Source location

2018-0250-Response-by-Network-Rail
Page 2 · response
Published 24 September 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Erect a warning sign describing the dangers, Network Rail ownership and trespass prohibition.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Noting your concerns identified in your report, and following the Network Rail staff site assessment, Network Rail is planning to apply mitigation measures (wire mesh panels with base plated fence posts fixed to the top of the parapet walls) to the parapet walls to further deter access to the track below. An order has now been placed with Network Rail’s framework contractors in respect of these works, with an anticipated completion date of the end September 2018. Network Rail will also erect a warning sign of the dangers presented and that the land belongs to Network Rail and therefore access beyond is trespass.”

Source location

2018-0250-Response-by-Network-Rail
Page 2 · response
Published 24 September 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026