Derick James Stanmore · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 May 2015•Leicester City and South Leicestershire

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to recognise abnormal observations and escalate care
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable escalation of abnormal clinical observations
  2. Failure to provide healthcare staff with relevant clinical information before observations
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable access to relevant clinical records for safe care

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust

    Introduce an adapted Track and Trigger system across three prison healthcare teams and train staff to use it.

  2. Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust

    Remind staff to access clinical notes during routine prisoner consultations to inform clinical decisions.

  3. Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust

    Provide all staff with access to clinical information before seeing prisoners.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust

    Clinical information is already accessible to all staff before prisoners are seen, addressing the need for appropriate access.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognise abnormal observations and escalate care

Wider context from the report

“1. Observations were taken on the morning of Mr. Stanmore’s death by a registered nurse. The observations were abnormal and required further action to be taken but this was not recognised. A system similar to the hospital “Early Warning Score” (EWS) may assist the healthcare staff in recognising this and escalating care accordingly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable escalation of abnormal clinical observations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide healthcare staff with relevant clinical information before observations

Wider context from the report

“2. The nurse attending Mr. Stanmore did not access his healthcare records that were available and did not appear to have any information regarding the need for a healthcare assessment. He was therefore taking observations without the benefit of relevant clinical information in order to consider these in context. Consideration should be given to ensuring all staff have appropriate access whenever possible to information before conducting examinations or observations of prisoners. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to relevant clinical records for safe care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce an adapted Track and Trigger system across three prison healthcare teams and train staff to use it.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Healthcare Management / Clinical Leadership Team will be introducing an adapted version of the Track and Trigger system as attached. Staff will need to be trained in the use of this tool across our three Prison Healthcare Teams and we anticipate that this will be in place by the 1 October 2015.”

Source location

2015-0172-Response-by-Leicestershire-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind staff to access clinical notes during routine prisoner consultations to inform clinical decisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“After review, I can confirm that all staff are able to access clinical information prior to seeing Prisoners. Staff will be reminded that it is an expectation that when Prisoners are seen routinely, clinical notes should be accessed in order to make a well informed clinical decision.”

Source location

2015-0172-Response-by-Leicestershire-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide all staff with access to clinical information before seeing prisoners.

Verbatim wording from the response

“After review, I can confirm that all staff are able to access clinical information prior to seeing Prisoners. Staff will be reminded that it is an expectation that when Prisoners are seen routinely, clinical notes should be accessed in order to make a well informed clinical decision.”

Source location

2015-0172-Response-by-Leicestershire-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Clinical information is already accessible to all staff before prisoners are seen, addressing the need for appropriate access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“After review, I can confirm that all staff are able to access clinical information prior to seeing Prisoners. Staff will be reminded that it is an expectation that when Prisoners are seen routinely, clinical notes should be accessed in order to make a well informed clinical decision.”

Source location

2015-0172-Response-by-Leicestershire-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026