PFD report

Jeremiah Obaka · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Oct 2017•South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to communicate guidelines between the local authority and care agency
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable multi-agency communication procedures
  2. Lack of an agreed and consistent policy for service users who do not reply or cannot be found
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate guidelines between the local authority and care agency

Wider context from the report

“There was no agreed and consistent policy or guideline on what should happen in the event that a service user did not reply or could not be found. The local authority (now through a separate Limited company) and the care agency had separate and different guidelines, neither of which had been communicated to the other. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable multi-agency communication procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of an agreed and consistent policy for service users who do not reply or cannot be found

Wider context from the report

“There was no agreed and consistent policy or guideline on what should happen in the event that a service user did not reply or could not be found. The local authority (now through a separate Limited company) and the care agency had separate and different guidelines, neither of which had been communicated to the other. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026