PFD report

Ms Shannon Quinn · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Sep 2019•Black Country

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
7

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
20

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised7

  1. Failure to adhere to the five-minute patient observation level
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable patient observation arrangements
  2. Inconsistent and minimal training for care staff in managing complex patient needs
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate staff training for managing complex care needs
  3. Minimal training for care staff in performing patient resuscitation
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure staff competence in resuscitation
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Discuss information sharing with Trust leaders and check improvements during the next Trust inspection.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 March 2020.
  2. Action

    Follow up Oak House’s planned staff-training improvements at the next scheduled inspection.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 March 2020.
  3. Action

    Review provider actions following the external environmental risk audit and assess ongoing environmental safety-assessment systems at the next inspection.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 March 2020.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Regulations do not prescribe specific staff training content or format, limiting the ability to require a particular training approach.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to adhere to the five-minute patient observation level

Wider context from the report

“5. The patient observation level of 5 minutes was introduced to minimise risk of self-harm but not adhered to. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable patient observation arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inconsistent and minimal training for care staff in managing complex patient needs

Wider context from the report

“2. There was inconsistent and minimal training provided to Oak House staff in respect of managing SQ’s complex needs by the Mental Health Trust. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate staff training for managing complex care needs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Minimal training for care staff in performing patient resuscitation

Wider context from the report

“6. Evidence emerged during the inquest that there had been minimal training for Oak House staff in performing resuscitation on patients. The training received included general first aid training by e-learning. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure staff competence in resuscitation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a joint multidisciplinary care plan

Wider context from the report

“3. There was a lack of a joint multi-disciplinary/Trust care plan and insufficient contact with the care coordinator due to difficulties in travelling to meet the patient outside the normal Trust area and staff sickness absence. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inconsistent sharing of clinical documentation and care plans between statutory agencies and private-sector care providers

Wider context from the report

“1. Evidence emerged during the inquest that there was inconsistent sharing of documentation and case notes between the statutory agencies and private sector. In particular, there was no sharing of medical notes/care plans between the Birmingham and Solihull and Mental Health Trust and Oak House. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient contact with the care coordinator

Wider context from the report

“3. There was a lack of a joint multi-disciplinary/Trust care plan and insufficient contact with the care coordinator due to difficulties in travelling to meet the patient outside the normal Trust area and staff sickness absence. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable community care-coordinator provision and contact.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide a ligature-free environment despite escalating ligature and self-harm risk

Wider context from the report

“4. There was an escalating risk of use of ligatures and incidents of self-harm and little if any measures were introduced to try and provide a ligature free environment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss information sharing with Trust leaders and check improvements during the next Trust inspection.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At our next meeting with Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust we will discuss with the senior leaders how information is shared with private providers who take patients from the trust and what action has been taken to ensure essential information is being shared.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Follow up Oak House’s planned staff-training improvements at the next scheduled inspection.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to our inspection findings, Camino Healthcare Limited submitted an action plan that detailed their intention to review the training provided to staff. We will follow this up at our next scheduled inspection to ensure that sufficient action has been taken to improve the training provided to staff.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review provider actions following the external environmental risk audit and assess ongoing environmental safety-assessment systems at the next inspection.

Verbatim wording from the response

“ligature risks. You must provide CQC with a copy of the risk assessment and actions taken by you as a result of the risk assessment.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide staff with further Intensive Life Support and, where required, Basic First Aid training including CPR.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have also evaluated all of our training and our staff have received further training in Intensive Life Support and also Basic First Aid (where required) which includes CPR. The Intensive Life Support which is mandatory for our staff exceeds the regulatory requirements of the service.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-Camino-Healthcare-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Evaluate staff training requirements and provision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have also evaluated all of our training and our staff have received further training in Intensive Life Support and also Basic First Aid (where required) which includes CPR. The Intensive Life Support which is mandatory for our staff exceeds the regulatory requirements of the service.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-Camino-Healthcare-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the premises and make environmental changes to achieve an anti-ligature environment as far as reasonably practicable.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A full and thorough review of the premises was undertaken immediately after the incident and changes were made to make the environment anti-ligature as far as is reasonably practicable.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-Camino-Healthcare-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Regulations do not prescribe specific staff training content or format, limiting the ability to require a particular training approach.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you may be aware the fundamental standards regulations we inspect against do not prescribe what particular training providers must provide to their staff, nor in what format. However, registered providers must ensure that:”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
Page 6 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The three people currently living at Oak House did not present a risk of self-harm or suicide, qualifying the environmental ligature-risk concern.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are aware that there are only currently three people living at Oak House, and that these people do not present risk of self-harm or suicide. However, at the next scheduled inspection, we will review the actions taken in response to the external professional’s audit, and review if the provider has systems to regularly assess the safety of the environment for the remaining service users.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.14

  1. 1

    Continue monitoring Oak House while regulatory improvements are assessed.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 25 March 2020.
  2. 2

    Share identified safeguarding incidents with relevant agencies and review information-sharing systems at Oak House’s next inspection.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 25 March 2020.
  3. 3

    Review inquest evidence to inform monitoring of Oak House and identify ongoing risks.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 March 2020.
  4. 4

    Inspect Oak House to investigate risks involving self-harm, suicidal ideation, incident reporting and managerial oversight.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 March 2020.
  5. 5

    Place Oak House into special measures and maintain regulatory review, including re-inspection to assess significant improvements.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 25 March 2020.
  6. 6

    Inspect Cromwell House in response to safety findings identified at Oak House.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 March 2020.
  7. 7

    Discuss out-of-area care coordination with Trust leaders and assess improvements during the planned 2020 inspection.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 March 2020.
  8. 8

    Undertake a further scheduled inspection of Oak House to assess improvements and compliance with registration conditions.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 March 2020.
  9. 9

    Impose urgent registration conditions addressing identified safety and oversight concerns, with additional conditions following further inspections.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 March 2020.
  10. 10

    Review continued compliance with required self-harm and suicide risk assessments at the next scheduled inspection.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 March 2020.
  11. 11

    Review the service and cared-for users to identify and address safety requirements.

    Stated by Camino Healthcare LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 March 2020.
  12. 12

    Continue closing Oak House service, with closure anticipated within six to eight weeks.

    Stated by Camino Healthcare LimitedStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 25 March 2020.
  13. 13

    Establish a new executive and management structure, replacing managers employed at the time of the death.

    Stated by Camino Healthcare LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 March 2020.
  14. 14

    Maintain communication with outside agencies and escalate issues to appropriate teams when necessary.

    Stated by Camino Healthcare LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 March 2020.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring Oak House while regulatory improvements are assessed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We intend to re-inspect Oak House in line with our inspection schedule. Whilst we cannot disclose the date of our next inspection, we can inform you that we will shortly be undertaking another inspection of Oak House to assess improvements made and action taken to meet the conditions placed on the provider on 17 May 2019. In the meantime we continue to monitor the service.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share identified safeguarding incidents with relevant agencies and review information-sharing systems at Oak House’s next inspection.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During the inspection of Oak House in May and June 2019, inspectors identified failures in the providers systems to work with other agencies. In particular the inspection identified that a total of 53 safeguarding incidents had not been escalated to the local authority. CQC had also not been notified of these incidents as required by law. We are currently considering enforcement action in relation to this failure to notify us of incidents. These incidents were shared with agencies following the inspection by CQC and the provider.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review inquest evidence to inform monitoring of Oak House and identify ongoing risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In terms of the actions already undertaken by the CQC following receipt of information concerning the death of Ms Quinn, CQC first became aware of Miss Quinn’s in January 2019 when the provider notified us of her death. Upon receipt of the evidence bundle for Miss Quinn’s inquest on 30 April 2019, we reviewed the evidence for the purpose of informing our monitoring of the service. On that basis we identified potential ongoing risks for people living at Oak House. These risks related to the management of self-harming behaviours and suicidal ideation. In response, we began a comprehensive inspection of the service on 15 May 2019. Over the course of the 15 and 16 May 2019, inspectors visiting the service identified serious concerns in relation to the following:”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inspect Oak House to investigate risks involving self-harm, suicidal ideation, incident reporting and managerial oversight.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In terms of the actions already undertaken by the CQC following receipt of information concerning the death of Ms Quinn, CQC first became aware of Miss Quinn’s in January 2019 when the provider notified us of her death. Upon receipt of the evidence bundle for Miss Quinn’s inquest on 30 April 2019, we reviewed the evidence for the purpose of informing our monitoring of the service. On that basis we identified potential ongoing risks for people living at Oak House. These risks related to the management of self-harming behaviours and suicidal ideation. In response, we began a comprehensive inspection of the service on 15 May 2019. Over the course of the 15 and 16 May 2019, inspectors visiting the service identified serious concerns in relation to the following:”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Place Oak House into special measures and maintain regulatory review, including re-inspection to assess significant improvements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A report of our findings from this inspection can be found at https://www.cqc.org.uk/location/1-1249253242. You will note that the provider was given an overall rating of inadequate and placed into special measures. This means we will keep the service under review and, if we do not propose to cancel the provider’s registration, we will re-inspect within 6 months to check for significant improvements.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inspect Cromwell House in response to safety findings identified at Oak House.

Verbatim wording from the response

“An inspection of the other active Camino Healthcare Limited service, Cromwell House, was also undertaken in response to the findings at Oak House. This inspection took place on 13 June 2019. The provider was given a rating of Requires Improvement for this service.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss out-of-area care coordination with Trust leaders and assess improvements during the planned 2020 inspection.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The local inspection team meets regularly with leaders of the Trust and will at their next meeting be discussing with the Trust how they currently liaise with organisations that take patients outside of their normal catchment area. We are planning an inspection of the trust in 2020 and will follow this up at that inspection to ensure action has been taken to improve coordination of patient care when patients are out of area.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake a further scheduled inspection of Oak House to assess improvements and compliance with registration conditions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We intend to re-inspect Oak House in line with our inspection schedule. Whilst we cannot disclose the date of our next inspection, we can inform you that we will shortly be undertaking another inspection of Oak House to assess improvements made and action taken to meet the conditions placed on the provider on 17 May 2019. In the meantime we continue to monitor the service.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Impose urgent registration conditions addressing identified safety and oversight concerns, with additional conditions following further inspections.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The seriousness of the concerns led to us taking urgent enforcement action on 17 May 2019 imposing conditions on the provider’s registration pursuant to section 31 Health and Social Care Act 2008 (HSCA). Further inspection visits were conducted on the 21 May 2019 and 4 June 2019. In response to the information and evidence gathered during those further visits CQC took further urgent enforcement action and imposed additional conditions dated 22 May 2019, also pursuant to section 31 HSCA. We then met with the provider on the 27 June 2019 to discuss our concerns.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review continued compliance with required self-harm and suicide risk assessments at the next scheduled inspection.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We reviewed the provider’s compliance with this condition on 21 May 2019 and found that the provider had implemented these risk assessments. This condition remains on the provider’s registration and we will further review their compliance with this at the next scheduled inspection.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the service and cared-for users to identify and address safety requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Notwithstanding the planned closure, since the incident Camino Healthcare have undertaken a significant review of the service, and the service users who we care for, in order to ensure their safety.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-Camino-Healthcare-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue closing Oak House service, with closure anticipated within six to eight weeks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“By way of an update on the Service provided at Oak House; this is in the process of closing and there are only 3 remaining residents. We continue to assist outside agencies in transitioning these residents to suitable placements and anticipate that the service will be closed within 6 to 8 weeks.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-Camino-Healthcare-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a new executive and management structure, replacing managers employed at the time of the death.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We now have a new Executive team and all of the Managers who were employed at the time of the death have since left the company. The new Management and Organisational Structure have maintained clear communication with outside agencies and, when necessary, have ensured that issues are escalated to the appropriate teams.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-Camino-Healthcare-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain communication with outside agencies and escalate issues to appropriate teams when necessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We now have a new Executive team and all of the Managers who were employed at the time of the death have since left the company. The new Management and Organisational Structure have maintained clear communication with outside agencies and, when necessary, have ensured that issues are escalated to the appropriate teams.”

Source location

2019-0499-Response-from-Camino-Healthcare-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 25 March 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026