PFD report

Michael Lobban · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Oct 2019•London Inner (West)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
7

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised7

  1. Delays in investigating controlled-drug discrepancies
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigations
  2. Failure to fully follow through contact with regular methadone prescription users
  3. Lack of sanctions for pharmacies mislaying controlled drugs
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safeguards for access to dangerous drugs
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in investigating controlled-drug discrepancies

Wider context from the report

“1. The investigation carried out by The Boots Company PLC into the disparity of Methadone tablets on this occasion was slow and efforts to contact patients who were regular prescription users of methadone was not fully followed through. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to fully follow through contact with regular methadone prescription users

Wider context from the report

“1. The investigation carried out by The Boots Company PLC into the disparity of Methadone tablets on this occasion was slow and efforts to contact patients who were regular prescription users of methadone was not fully followed through. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of sanctions for pharmacies mislaying controlled drugs

Wider context from the report

“4. The General Pharmaceutical Council (“The Council”) being the Regulator of Pharmaceutical industry in England and Wales does not have any reporting requirements for pharmacies when discovering a discrepancy in schedule 2 controlled drugs. Moreover there appear to be no investigative powers by The Council where it discovers a disparity of these controlled drugs and as a consequence there are no sanctions in circumstances where pharmacies have mislaid drugs during the course of their handling of controlled drugs. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safeguards for access to dangerous drugs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of regulatory investigative powers for controlled-drug discrepancies

Wider context from the report

“4. The General Pharmaceutical Council (“The Council”) being the Regulator of Pharmaceutical industry in England and Wales does not have any reporting requirements for pharmacies when discovering a discrepancy in schedule 2 controlled drugs. Moreover there appear to be no investigative powers by The Council where it discovers a disparity of these controlled drugs and as a consequence there are no sanctions in circumstances where pharmacies have mislaid drugs during the course of their handling of controlled drugs. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of physical checking of prescription-box contents during controlled-drug audits

Wider context from the report

“3. There appears to be no physical check of the contents of prescription boxes when carrying out the audit of schedule 2 controlled drugs. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safeguards for access to dangerous drugs; Unreliable controlled-drug custody, documentation and audit controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of double-checking in controlled-drug audits

Wider context from the report

“2. The audit checking of controlled drugs by The Boots Company PLC is not robust in that there is no double check in place in relation to the audit checking procedure followed by Boots. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable controlled-drug custody, documentation and audit controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of pharmacy reporting requirements for schedule 2 controlled-drug discrepancies

Wider context from the report

“4. The General Pharmaceutical Council (“The Council”) being the Regulator of Pharmaceutical industry in England and Wales does not have any reporting requirements for pharmacies when discovering a discrepancy in schedule 2 controlled drugs. Moreover there appear to be no investigative powers by The Council where it discovers a disparity of these controlled drugs and as a consequence there are no sanctions in circumstances where pharmacies have mislaid drugs during the course of their handling of controlled drugs. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable controlled-drug custody, documentation and audit controls.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.