PFD report

Derryck Lynn CROCKER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 1 Aug 2024•Norfolk

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
5

Named on the report

Responses found
8

Of 5 recipients

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure to recognise and report air embolism cases
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable reporting of patient-safety incidents
  2. Delays in recognising air embolism
  3. Delays in treating air embolism
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Consider providing specific air-embolism recognition and management guidance through the RCEM eLearning platform.

    Stated by Royal College of Emergency MedicineStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 August 2024.
  2. Action

    Re-issue a previously published air-embolism case report to raise awareness among members.

    Stated by Royal College of Emergency MedicineStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 August 2024.
  3. Action

    Make a proposal to the NHS England Patient Safety Committee for a patient safety alert on air embolism after CT-guided lung biopsy.

    Stated by The British Thoracic SocietyStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 August 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Air embolism is already covered in the core surgical curriculum, including central-line complications, and is commonly examined.

    Stated by Joint Committee on Surgical Training (JCSTDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognise and report air embolism cases

Wider context from the report

“2. I also heard evidence that in areas where enhanced training has been provided, due to adverse incidents such as Mr Crocker’s death, there appears to be increased numbers of cases. This leads to the question of whether the lack of knowledge means that such cases are missed and unreported and the rise is due to greater awareness. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable reporting of patient-safety incidents.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in recognising air embolism

Wider context from the report

“3. I heard that, in some cases, with timely treatment, outcome may be significantly improved, but that with delayed recognition and therefore delayed treatment, death is more likely. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in treating air embolism

Wider context from the report

“3. I heard that, in some cases, with timely treatment, outcome may be significantly improved, but that with delayed recognition and therefore delayed treatment, death is more likely. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of nationally consistent air embolism awareness training across relevant specialties

Wider context from the report

“4. I heard evidence that there is ongoing work with the Royal College of Radiologists to provide them training on this issue, but that training was needed to ensure that all other specialties who may encounter this condition have raised awareness nationally. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of knowledge and training on recognising air embolism following invasive procedures

Wider context from the report

“1. I heard evidence that there is a lack of understanding of the signs and symptoms of an air embolism and the risk of this following any invasive procedure. I heard evidence that nationwide and across all levels of specialism and seniority, there was a lack of knowledge and that air embolism is not something that is routinely taught as part of the training of doctors. While it is accepted that this is rare, it is life threatening if not appropriately treated swiftly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for air embolism during invasive procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider providing specific air-embolism recognition and management guidance through the RCEM eLearning platform.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We note the known rare side-effect of an air embolism following lung biopsy occurred outside of the emergency department. Emergency physicians are aware of the possibility of air embolism following invasive procedures such as the insertion of central lines and therefore take precautions, such as ‘head down’ positioning, to prevent this. However, we are grateful to you for highlighting this tragic case and we intend to raise awareness of the condition of air embolism amongst RCEM members by re-issuing a previously published case report involving air embolism as well as considering providing specific guidance on the recognition and management of air embolism on our RCEM eLearning educational platform.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Emergency Medicine
Page 1 · response
Published 8 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Re-issue a previously published air-embolism case report to raise awareness among members.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We note the known rare side-effect of an air embolism following lung biopsy occurred outside of the emergency department. Emergency physicians are aware of the possibility of air embolism following invasive procedures such as the insertion of central lines and therefore take precautions, such as ‘head down’ positioning, to prevent this. However, we are grateful to you for highlighting this tragic case and we intend to raise awareness of the condition of air embolism amongst RCEM members by re-issuing a previously published case report involving air embolism as well as considering providing specific guidance on the recognition and management of air embolism on our RCEM eLearning educational platform.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Emergency Medicine
Page 1 · response
Published 8 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make a proposal to the NHS England Patient Safety Committee for a patient safety alert on air embolism after CT-guided lung biopsy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We suggest that this would be suitable for a patient safety alert such as those issued by NHS England to ensure that there is a timely and appropriate response to such cases, with the intention of preventing future deaths. The British Thoracic Society will make a proposal to the NHS England Patient Safety Committee and will provide any advice and support requested of us.”

Source location

Response from British Thoracic Society
Page 1 · response
Published 8 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add air embolism risks and management to appropriate educational events across relevant specialist sections during the coming year.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The Presidents of all the relevant specialist Sections at the RSM have been asked to add in the risks of air embolism and its management to any appropriate educational events for the coming year.”

Source location

Response from Royal Society of Medicine
Page 1 · response
Published 8 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use the Patient Safety Summit to teach medical students and junior doctors about air embolism risks and post-procedure signs and symptoms through an anaesthetics specialist.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The Patient Safety section, which is running its 14th annual event for those at medical school and junior doctors, will use its Patient Safety Summit on 14 November 2024 to elevate the profile of the risks of air embolism and the signs and symptoms that might be seen following any invasive procedure. This will be covered by a specialist in anaesthetics.”

Source location

Response from Royal Society of Medicine
Page 1 · response
Published 8 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Air embolism is already covered in the core surgical curriculum, including central-line complications, and is commonly examined.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Assessment and management of thromboembolism is part of the scope of the MRCS/CST curriculum and the part of the syllabus which involves placement/management of central line will have in general included considerations for complications such as air embolism. An understanding of the risks of anaesthesia and medical gases is generic to surgical training.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Surgeons of England
Page 2 · response
Published 8 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The air embolism occurred outside the emergency department and was a rare known complication of lung biopsy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We note the known rare side-effect of an air embolism following lung biopsy occurred outside of the emergency department. Emergency physicians are aware of the possibility of air embolism following invasive procedures such as the insertion of central lines and therefore take precautions, such as ‘head down’ positioning, to prevent this. However, we are grateful to you for highlighting this tragic case and we intend to raise awareness of the condition of air embolism amongst RCEM members by re-issuing a previously published case report involving air embolism as well as considering providing specific guidance on the recognition and management of air embolism on our RCEM eLearning educational platform.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Emergency Medicine
Page 1 · response
Published 8 August 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Flag air embolism within ATLS and CCrISP governance mechanisms.

    Stated by Joint Committee on Surgical Training (JCSTStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 August 2024.
  2. 2

    Draw members’ attention to the risk of air embolism through regular communications.

    Stated by Joint Committee on Surgical Training (JCSTStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 August 2024.
  3. 3

    Complete an observational peer review of interventional-radiology practice and obtain its written outcome report.

    Stated by James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 August 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Flag air embolism within ATLS and CCrISP governance mechanisms.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will flag this within our governance mechanisms for ATLS and CCrISP (ATLS steering group and CCrISP clinical lead and working party) and will draw attention to the risk of air embolism with our membership through our regular communications.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Surgeons of England
Page 2 · response
Published 8 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Draw members’ attention to the risk of air embolism through regular communications.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will flag this within our governance mechanisms for ATLS and CCrISP (ATLS steering group and CCrISP clinical lead and working party) and will draw attention to the risk of air embolism with our membership through our regular communications.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Surgeons of England
Page 2 · response
Published 8 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete an observational peer review of interventional-radiology practice and obtain its written outcome report.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action 2b – The observational peer review was completed in August 2024 by ████████ Consultant Cardiothoracic Radiologist at Cambridge University Hospitals. The Trust received the written outcome report (as per attachment 1).”

Source location

Response from James Paget University Hospitals (page 1)
Page 1 · response
Published 8 August 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
8/5

Data last updated 7 September 2026