PFD report

Christian Barry · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Sep 2025•West Yorkshire Eastern

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of a formal system for communication, information sharing and handover between the respite facility and the Intensive Support Service
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable handover of care information and responsibilityPart of recurring concern: Unreliable multi-agency communication procedures
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.8

  1. Action

    Monitor handover-process compliance and effectiveness through audits and feedback mechanisms.

    Stated by Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service and Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 September 2025.
  2. Action

    Ensure CRISS shift coordinators bring Oasis handover information to each locality’s daily multidisciplinary team meeting.

    Stated by Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service and Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 September 2025.
  3. Action

    Use a standardised daily handover template to capture clinical information, reviews, tasks, incidents, MDT comments and required follow-up.

    Stated by Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service and Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 September 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing referral, admission, joint review, interface, operations and governance processes provide formal communication and risk-management arrangements.

    Stated by Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service and Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a formal system for communication, information sharing and handover between the respite facility and the Intensive Support Service

Wider context from the report

“There remains no system for formal communication, sharing and handover of information about patients who are admitted to the respite facility operated by Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service, but remain under the clinical care of the Intensive Support Service at Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust. It was candidly accepted in evidence that there needs to be an improvement in communication channels and information sharing for the partnership to run efficiently and effectively and to mitigate risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable handover of care information and responsibility; Unreliable multi-agency communication procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor handover-process compliance and effectiveness through audits and feedback mechanisms.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. Training and Governance”

Source location

Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
Page 3 · response
Published 19 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure CRISS shift coordinators bring Oasis handover information to each locality’s daily multidisciplinary team meeting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Multidisciplinary Review Meetings”

Source location

Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
Page 2 · response
Published 19 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use a standardised daily handover template to capture clinical information, reviews, tasks, incidents, MDT comments and required follow-up.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Standardised Daily Handover and implementation of daily ‘huddle’ meeting”

Source location

Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
Page 1 · response
Published 19 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore Oasis staff access to LYPFT’s electronic patient record and discuss the proposal through the operations meeting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the above, the CRISS team at LYPFT and Oasis staff are exploring the possibility of Oasis staff having access to LYPFT’s electronic patient record. This will be taken for further discussion through the operations meeting (described below).”

Source location

Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
Page 3 · response
Published 19 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Record handover details and required actions in Oasis’s own system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Documentation improvements”

Source location

Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
Page 2 · response
Published 19 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hold a daily Oasis–CRISS huddle to discuss handover information and address immediate actions and queries.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Once completed, the handover sheet is emailed to the appropriate LYPFT Crisis Resolution Intensive Support Service (CRISS) team. There are three locality teams East, South, and West, and the handover is sent to the corresponding area in which the individual is currently receiving care. The shift coordinator within the CRISS team is responsible for accessing this information and ensuring this is taken for discussion in the daily ‘huddle’ meeting as described below.”

Source location

Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
Page 2 · response
Published 19 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide training on the handover sheet, including each organisation’s roles and responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. Training and Governance”

Source location

Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
Page 3 · response
Published 19 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add Oasis handover notes, MDT discussions and required actions to LYPFT care records.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• LYPFT adds Oasis handover notes to the patient’s LYPFT care record as well as a full record of the MDT discussion and any required action.”

Source location

Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
Page 3 · response
Published 19 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing referral, admission, joint review, interface, operations and governance processes provide formal communication and risk-management arrangements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We would also like to take this opportunity to describe the escalation processes and monitoring we currently have in place to ensure formal communication, risk management, and information sharing for patients admitted to the respite facility:”

Source location

Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
Page 3 · response
Published 19 September 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Recommence the joint LYPFT–Oasis operations meeting to provide strategic oversight of patient-safety and service-delivery risks.

    Stated by Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service and Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 September 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recommence the joint LYPFT–Oasis operations meeting to provide strategic oversight of patient-safety and service-delivery risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Operations Meeting – previously held monthly and attended by members include staff from LYPFT, Leeds Oasis and Integrated Care Board (ICB). The meeting provided a forum to escalate risks impacting patient safety and service delivery. The meeting allowed strategic operational oversight and will recommence in November 2025.”

Source location

Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
Page 3 · response
Published 19 September 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026