PFD report

Mohammed Zeeshan Akram (Zee) · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Nov 2023•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of routine cross-referencing between prescribed and collected medication
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably reconcile prescribed and dispensed medicationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable medication reconciliation across care transitions
  2. Failure to update prescribing GPs about medication non-adherence and stockpiling risks
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably notify primary care of changes affecting patient carePart of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of critical medication information to GPsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing medication-review procedures and subsequent GP notification were considered sufficient; no additional GP communication was expected before the review.

    Stated by North London NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of routine cross-referencing between prescribed and collected medication

Wider context from the report

“I heard evidence that there was no routine mechanism to cross reference what people are prescribed and what medication they are actually collecting, and no automatic notification to GPs who are responsible for the medication prescribing. Zee informed BEH that he had not taken his olanzapine and fluoxetine for two weeks. His GP, who was prescribing that medication, was not informed. I am concerned that GPs are not updated, particularly where patients have expressed suicidal ideation, and may not be aware that people are not taking medication and/or that there may be a risk of stockpiling. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably reconcile prescribed and dispensed medication; Unreliable medication reconciliation across care transitions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to update prescribing GPs about medication non-adherence and stockpiling risks

Wider context from the report

“I heard evidence that there was no routine mechanism to cross reference what people are prescribed and what medication they are actually collecting, and no automatic notification to GPs who are responsible for the medication prescribing. Zee informed BEH that he had not taken his olanzapine and fluoxetine for two weeks. His GP, who was prescribing that medication, was not informed. I am concerned that GPs are not updated, particularly where patients have expressed suicidal ideation, and may not be aware that people are not taking medication and/or that there may be a risk of stockpiling. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably notify primary care of changes affecting patient care; Unreliable communication of critical medication information to GPs; Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing medication-review procedures and subsequent GP notification were considered sufficient; no additional GP communication was expected before the review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This medication review by the prescribing clinician will automatically lead to the GP being notified when there are any changes to the client’s prescription or treatment plan, including whether the client has stopped taking the medication and any steps the service is taking to provide additional support. The expected standard is the GP would receive this correspondence via email within 48 hours of the medical review. In cases where a rapid medical review is arranged, the service will usually wait until the review before updating the GP, to ensure the GP is provided with the most up to date treatment plan.”

Source location

Response from Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 29 November 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026