JO ANNE CAROL NOBBS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Dec 2014•Norfolk

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to investigate and act on correlations between deteriorating physical and mental health
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to recognise and respond to deteriorating mental health in service users
  2. Failure to document and revise continuing care plans when engagement assumptions change
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable care-planning processes

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust

    Share learning about missed-appointment practice across the Trust through the Patient Safety Newsletter and internal forums.

  2. Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust

    Refresh the clinical team on missed-appointment policy and discuss missed appointments in weekly meetings.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to investigate and act on correlations between deteriorating physical and mental health

Wider context from the report

“(1) A correlation between Miss Nobbs’ deteriorating physical health and her deteriorating mental health was noted by some mental health professionals and documented in her mental health records but this was not investigated or acted upon by other mental health professionals, despite Miss Nobbs attending at A & E Department, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital on at least 10 occasions between January and March 2014 presenting with a variety of symptoms and at varying times of day and night ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise and respond to deteriorating mental health in service users.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to document and revise continuing care plans when engagement assumptions change

Wider context from the report

“(2) A Care Plan was put in place in January 2014 of steps to be taken on the basis that Miss Nobbs was going to engage with mental health services. The evidence is that this plan was kept under review and was a “continuing” plan. There is no documentation supporting such a continuing plan, particularly when Miss Nobbs was no longer engaging with mental health services. She had not been seen on a 1:1 basis before 26th February 2014 by any of the Community Mental Health Team, save in respect of a believed sighting in the street. There is no evidence of a revised Care Plan being put in place, save in respect of continuing to try to make contact with Miss Nobbs. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable care-planning processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning about missed-appointment practice across the Trust through the Patient Safety Newsletter and internal forums.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust’s internal investigation identified this was a matter of concern observing the clinical team did not follow Trust policy. This policy provides guidance for staff in the event of missed or cancelled appointments. The report made recommendation that work was undertaken with the team to improve this area of practice. I confirm the team have completed the recommendation. They have been refreshed on the Policy and provided evidence they are discussing missed appointments in their weekly clinical team meetings. We will be sharing this learning more widely within the Trust, via our Patient Safety Newsletter and internal forums.”

Source location

2014-0560-Response-by-Norfolk-and-suffolk-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 4 December 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Refresh the clinical team on missed-appointment policy and discuss missed appointments in weekly meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust’s internal investigation identified this was a matter of concern observing the clinical team did not follow Trust policy. This policy provides guidance for staff in the event of missed or cancelled appointments. The report made recommendation that work was undertaken with the team to improve this area of practice. I confirm the team have completed the recommendation. They have been refreshed on the Policy and provided evidence they are discussing missed appointments in their weekly clinical team meetings. We will be sharing this learning more widely within the Trust, via our Patient Safety Newsletter and internal forums.”

Source location

2014-0560-Response-by-Norfolk-and-suffolk-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 4 December 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026