PFD report

Dean Ronald Edmund BOLAND · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Nov 2015•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
12

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
12

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised12

  1. Failure to monitor prisoners overnight
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisoners
  2. Failure of prison, health and DART workers to share drug issue information adequately
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of illicit substance use and supply in secure institutionsPart of recurring concern: Unsafe interoperability between prison custody and healthcare procedures
  3. Insufficient exercise-area officer staffing for package security
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Hold monthly drug-strategy meetings, require B-Wing officers to attend, and require detox and recovery staff to confirm they have read the minutes.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 25 November 2015.
  2. Action

    Observe and record medication swallowing, supplementing opioid-substitution administration with mouth checks and officer presence to address concealment concerns.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 November 2015.
  3. Action

    Train specialist dogs to search for and detect new psychoactive substances in prisons.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 November 2015.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    Increasing exercise supervision is not considered necessary because staffing levels are risk assessed and additional staff would not be the best use of resources.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceNo action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to monitor prisoners overnight

Wider context from the report

“5. Prisoners on B wing are not viewed or monitored at all overnight unless they are on an ACCT. This gives them a considerable period of time to smoke and use drugs knowing there will be no supervision or observation from prison officers. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisoners.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of prison, health and DART workers to share drug issue information adequately

Wider context from the report

“2. There is a lack of multi-disciplinary approach to drug issues within the prison. The evidence heard at the inquest confirmed that prison officers, health workers and DART workers do not adequately discuss trends and general drugs issues to ensure all staff are up to date and aware of the problems. It is accepted that patient’s confidentiality needs to be maintained but it is essential to discuss trends and significant events in a multi-disciplinary way. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of illicit substance use and supply in secure institutions; Unsafe interoperability between prison custody and healthcare procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient exercise-area officer staffing for package security

Wider context from the report

“10. The prison should investigate whether 3 prison officer on duty in the exercise area is sufficient for 172 prisoners given the number of packages that are thrown over the walls every week. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient exercise-area netting and package interception

Wider context from the report

“9. There are several exercise areas at the prison. Only two have netting. Further consideration needs to be given to netting other areas given the number of packages being thrown over the wall and then secreted by prisoners on their person. The inquest heard that only a small proportion of packages are seized as they come over the wall. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate prison physical security controls preventing transfer of drugs and contraband.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to inform prison officers of positive drug test results

Wider context from the report

“8. Prison officers are unaware of positive drug test results and therefore unable to take any action in response. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable prison response to positive drug tests.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate overnight security officer capacity for B wing

Wider context from the report

“6. The prison deploy a security officer to B wing at night (172 prisoners).This person is unable to interact with prisoners and is only there to answer call bells. This seems inadequate given that this group of prisoners are at high risk of drug use particularly at night when there are no cell checks. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisoners.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient drug-dog coverage for screening prisoners and visitors

Wider context from the report

“12. Birmingham prison has 2 drug dogs who work on a shift pattern. This means not every area in the prison can be covered as only one dog is on duty at any one time. Given that these dogs are the only current mechanism for identifying certain drugs consideration needs to be given to having more dogs so that prisoners and visitors coming into the prison will always be screened. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable searches and screening for drugs and prohibited items in controlled environments.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to check prisoners' mouths during general medicine administration

Wider context from the report

“3. General medicine administration does not involve a check of the mouth so prisoners can easily conceal tablets to sell later. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe medication administration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of prison officer awareness and understanding of drug issues

Wider context from the report

“1. There was a general lack of awareness and understanding of the drugs issues in the prison by prison officers. Two prison officers who worked on B wing said they were unaware of any problems with prisoners using illicit drugs including general medications. Prison officers need a comprehensive education program to understand what drugs are being used and sold and how prisoners come by those drugs. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of illicit substance use and supply in secure institutions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient cell searching for drugs

Wider context from the report

“4. Cell searches only take place for a certain number of cells each month on a random basis as prescribed by NOMS, or for targeted cells when there is sufficient intelligence. Intelligence searches only take place when there is at least 2 pieces of intelligence. Given the extent of the drug problem on B wing this seems insufficient. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of capability to screen incoming prisoners and visitors for concealed drugs

Wider context from the report

“11. At present there is no ability to search or screen prisoners or visitors for drugs concealed on their person when they come into prison. Given that this is a major source of drugs coming into the prison further consideration need to be given, on a national level, as to how concealed drugs can be identified for example with the use of a full body scanner. The current scanner can only identify metal objects. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable searches and screening for drugs and prohibited items in controlled environments.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of compact drug results to DART workers

Wider context from the report

“7. DART workers are currently unable to access compact drug results as workers are unable to log onto the computer. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to drug test results.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hold monthly drug-strategy meetings, require B-Wing officers to attend, and require detox and recovery staff to confirm they have read the minutes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Drug strategy meetings are being held monthly and the purpose of these meetings is to discuss current issues and trends around drug misuse within the prison and to agree actions and strategies going forward. These meetings are attended by a cross-functional group of interested parties including clinical staff, residential managers and DART workers. From 9 December 2015 there has been mandatory attendance at these meetings from prison officers who work on B Wing. All staff on the detox and recovery unit will be required to sign a document indicating that they have read the minutes of the meeting each month. Also included in this meeting is discussion of those prisoners receiving opiate substitution medications who have failed both mandatory and compliance based drugs tests.”

Source location

2015-0468-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 25 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Observe and record medication swallowing, supplementing opioid-substitution administration with mouth checks and officer presence to address concealment concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Administration of IDTS medication is supplemented by a check of the mouth in line with the compact signed by IDTS recipients to comply with their treatment pathway. This is similar to supervised consumption being requested by the prescriber in the community.”

Source location

2015-0468-Response-by-NOMS
Page 2 · response
Published 25 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Train specialist dogs to search for and detect new psychoactive substances in prisons.

Verbatim wording from the response

“substances. It includes a new offence of possession of a psychoactive substance in a custodial institution, which will tackle the dangerous and pervasive use of new psychoactive substances in prisons. The Government recently commenced a clause in the Serious Crime Act, which introduces a new offence of throwing any item over a prison wall, including psychoactive substances. Plans are in place to provide widespread testing for psychoactive substances as part of the MDT process by April 2016, and NOMS has trained more than 300 specialist dogs to search and detect new psychoactive substances in prisons. NOMS is also evaluating the effectiveness of body scanners to tackle further the threat posed by drugs being smuggled into prisons.”

Source location

2015-0468-Response-by-NOMS
Page 5 · response
Published 25 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Evaluate body-scanner effectiveness for tackling drugs smuggled into prisons.

Verbatim wording from the response

“substances. It includes a new offence of possession of a psychoactive substance in a custodial institution, which will tackle the dangerous and pervasive use of new psychoactive substances in prisons. The Government recently commenced a clause in the Serious Crime Act, which introduces a new offence of throwing any item over a prison wall, including psychoactive substances. Plans are in place to provide widespread testing for psychoactive substances as part of the MDT process by April 2016, and NOMS has trained more than 300 specialist dogs to search and detect new psychoactive substances in prisons. NOMS is also evaluating the effectiveness of body scanners to tackle further the threat posed by drugs being smuggled into prisons.”

Source location

2015-0468-Response-by-NOMS
Page 5 · response
Published 25 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete drug-awareness training for prison staff by 31 January 2016.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Prison officers need a comprehensive education program to understand what drugs are being used and sold and how prisoners consume them Following the inquest, training on supervising the administration of opiate substitution medication has been completed with detox unit staff and drug awareness training is scheduled for completion by 31 January 2016.”

Source location

2015-0468-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 25 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake collaborative work with West Midlands Police to close the prison’s most significant illicit-substance ingress point.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Only two exercise yards have netting. Further consideration needs to be given to netting other areas given the number of packages being thrown over the wall and then secreted by prisoners on their person. Only a small proportion of packages are seized as they come over the wall. Preventing illicit articles from entering the prison is a key part of the prison’s supply reduction strategy, and a vast amount of work has been undertaken, in conjunction with West Midlands Police, on closing down the most significant ingress point, where the establishment considers it necessary it can submit bids for capital expenditure, and it would do so if it believed that additional security measures would make an impact on supply.”

Source location

2015-0468-Response-by-NOMS
Page 4 · response
Published 25 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss drug-misuse trends in monthly drug-strategy and security meetings and identify and implement risk-reduction actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Issues around the misuse of illicit drugs and prescribed medication are discussed during monthly drug strategy and security meetings. During the meeting trends and issues around drug misuse of all kinds are discussed and actions to reduce the risk and likelihood of these occurrences are identified and put in place. Due consideration is given to confidentiality, but this does not prevent discussion around these issues.”

Source location

2015-0468-Response-by-NOMS
Page 2 · response
Published 25 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increasing exercise supervision is not considered necessary because staffing levels are risk assessed and additional staff would not be the best use of resources.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The prison should investigate whether 3 prison officers on duty in the exercise area is sufficient for 172 prisoners given the number of packages that are thrown over the walls every week. Staffing levels for exercise are risk assessed appropriately. B wing exercise yard has no external ingress point; the detox wing was moved to B wing on account of this, so that no throw overs can reach the exercise yard. Increasing the number of staff supervising exercise is not felt to be necessary, and it would not be the best use of resources.”

Source location

2015-0468-Response-by-NOMS
Page 4 · response
Published 25 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

There is no clinical requirement to check prisoners’ mouths when administering controlled or general medication.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Controlled drug administration is carried out by two nursing staff in line with medicine code policy. There is no clinical requirement to check the mouth of prisoners. However, in accordance with the published standard operating procedure, the designated practitioner observes the prisoner taking his medication and annotates the medication chart to indicate that it has been taken and swallowed.”

Source location

2015-0468-Response-by-NOMS
Page 2 · response
Published 25 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No additional night staff are planned because current deployment exceeds contractual requirements and provides access to senior and clinical staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Prisoners on B Wing are not viewed or monitored overnight unless they are on an ACCT giving them a considerable period of time to smoke and use drugs Across the prison service there is no routine night time monitoring for prisoners other than those subject to the Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) case management process and those who are segregated or located on an inpatient ward. It is important that during night state the reduced numbers of staff are deployed to supervise those most vulnerable or at risk.”

Source location

2015-0468-Response-by-NOMS
Page 3 · response
Published 25 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Four drug dogs are deployed strategically according to intelligence and risk, including searches of prisoners, visitors, cells and targeted areas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Consideration needs to be given to having more dogs so that prisoners and visitors coming into the prison will always be screened HMP Birmingham has four operational drug dogs at its disposal. There are two dog handlers each of whom has two drug dogs: a passive drug dog (trained to search people) and an active drug dog (trained to search areas).”

Source location

2015-0468-Response-by-NOMS
Page 5 · response
Published 25 November 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Manage B Wing through the drug-strategy manager outside the normal residential function and provide collaborative named nurse and DART-worker support for opioid-substitution patients.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 November 2015.
  2. 2

    Address emerging psychoactive-substance issues through collaborative work by clinicians, drug workers and prison officers.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 November 2015.
  3. 3

    Provide widespread psychoactive-substance testing through the mandatory drug-testing process by April 2016.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 November 2015.
  4. 4

    Complete training for detox-unit staff on supervising opiate-substitution medication administration.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 November 2015.
  5. 5

    Suspend Buscopan use pending clarification and escalate the potential illicit-use risk through the NHS to inform other establishments.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 November 2015.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Manage B Wing through the drug-strategy manager outside the normal residential function and provide collaborative named nurse and DART-worker support for opioid-substitution patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Prison officers, health workers and DART workers do not adequately discuss trends and general drugs issues to ensure all staff are up to date and aware of the problems B Wing is now managed outside of the normal residential function, by the drug strategy manager as part of his role. Each prisoner undergoing opiate substitution treatment has a named IDTS nurse and DART worker who work collaboratively with the individual on their recovery journey. Some members of the DART team are trained prison officers and others are drug and alcohol support workers from the prison’s partner organisation.”

Source location

2015-0468-Response-by-NOMS
Page 2 · response
Published 25 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Address emerging psychoactive-substance issues through collaborative work by clinicians, drug workers and prison officers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a result of these meetings significant amounts of work have been carried out with regard to emerging issues such as that of new psychotropics (NPS), which are widely misused both in custody and in the community. This work has been carried out collaboratively by clinicians, drug workers and prison officers.”

Source location

2015-0468-Response-by-NOMS
Page 2 · response
Published 25 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide widespread psychoactive-substance testing through the mandatory drug-testing process by April 2016.

Verbatim wording from the response

“substances. It includes a new offence of possession of a psychoactive substance in a custodial institution, which will tackle the dangerous and pervasive use of new psychoactive substances in prisons. The Government recently commenced a clause in the Serious Crime Act, which introduces a new offence of throwing any item over a prison wall, including psychoactive substances. Plans are in place to provide widespread testing for psychoactive substances as part of the MDT process by April 2016, and NOMS has trained more than 300 specialist dogs to search and detect new psychoactive substances in prisons. NOMS is also evaluating the effectiveness of body scanners to tackle further the threat posed by drugs being smuggled into prisons.”

Source location

2015-0468-Response-by-NOMS
Page 5 · response
Published 25 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete training for detox-unit staff on supervising opiate-substitution medication administration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Prison officers need a comprehensive education program to understand what drugs are being used and sold and how prisoners consume them Following the inquest, training on supervising the administration of opiate substitution medication has been completed with detox unit staff and drug awareness training is scheduled for completion by 31 January 2016.”

Source location

2015-0468-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 25 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Suspend Buscopan use pending clarification and escalate the potential illicit-use risk through the NHS to inform other establishments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following intelligence around the illicit use of Buscopan, an emergency medicines management meeting was convened on 20 April 2015, which included operational prison managers and all clinical managers. A joint decision was taken to suspend use of Buscopan as a medication whilst awaiting further clarification. This was also escalated through the NHS to ensure that other establishments were made aware of the potential for illicit use.”

Source location

2015-0468-Response-by-NOMS
Page 2 · response
Published 25 November 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026