PFD report

Harold Wilberforce · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Jul 2023•East Riding and Hull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of clarity about roles, responsibilities and required actions during falls at elderly service users' homes
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable response to falls at elderly people's homes
  2. Lack of training for pharmacy delivery staff on responding to service-user falls at home
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risks
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Set training requirements for unregistered pharmacy staff, including delivery drivers.

    Stated by General Pharmaceutical CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 July 2023.
  2. Action

    Remind inspectors to discuss pharmacy procedures for responding when delivery agents find service users fallen or otherwise at risk.

    Stated by General Pharmaceutical CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 18 July 2023.
  3. Action

    Assess the pharmacy’s safeguarding risks and factor the concern into inspection timing and focus decisions.

    Stated by General Pharmaceutical CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 18 July 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.6

  1. Position

    The regulator does not mandate training details for particular scenarios because pharmacy support staff have diverse roles.

    Stated by General Pharmaceutical CouncilNo action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clarity about roles, responsibilities and required actions during falls at elderly service users' homes

Wider context from the report

“(3) I am concerned that a lack of clarity exists in respect of the roles and responsibilities of persons attending upon the home addresses of elderly service users, particularly in the context of what action should be taken when someone is found to have fallen. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable response to falls at elderly people's homes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of training for pharmacy delivery staff on responding to service-user falls at home

Wider context from the report

“(2) Evidence was provided on behalf of the pharmacy that there was no training provided to staff members in respect of how to deal with and what actions should be taken when a service user is found to have had a fall at their home address by a pharmacy delivery agent. Evidence was also heard that the majority of service users were elderly persons. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Set training requirements for unregistered pharmacy staff, including delivery drivers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Delivery drivers themselves are not registered or directly regulated by us; nevertheless we have published guidance to ensure a safe and effective pharmacy team and we set requirements for the training of unregistered staff (which includes delivery drivers).”

Source location

Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
Page 2 · response
Published 18 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind inspectors to discuss pharmacy procedures for responding when delivery agents find service users fallen or otherwise at risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will also remind our inspectors to make sure that they include, through our ongoing inspections, discussions about whether a pharmacy has SOPs in place to support delivery agents/drivers and wider teams to know what to do and who to contact if they find that a service user has had a fall or is at risk in other ways. The inspectors do currently routinely ask about how pharmacies ensure that children and vulnerable adults are safeguarded. This means that we can check if pharmacies are proactively considering how to manage the risks associated with these situations.”

Source location

Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
Page 3 · response
Published 18 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess the pharmacy’s safeguarding risks and factor the concern into inspection timing and focus decisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From what has been described to us, on this occasion it does appear that there has been a failure to safeguard a vulnerable service-user. As the issues you have raised fall more into the category of how the pharmacy is being operated, we have referred the matter to our local Inspector who covers this particular pharmacy. They will assess the risks posed by the issues you have described, and determine what follow-up action may be appropriate. The Inspector will also factor this information into their decision-making”

Source location

Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
Page 1 · response
Published 18 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Enrol all delivery agents on the Delivering Medicines Safely and Effectively training programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have also contacted our staff training providers, the NPA, to identify any necessary update course for our delivery agents. They have responded by making us aware of a training programme titled: Delivering Medicines Safely and Effectively. We have reviewed the content of the course and are satisfied that this covers all the concerns and provides clarity for our staff in these circumstances.”

Source location

Response from Orchard 2000 Pharmacy
Page 1 · response
Published 18 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inform delivery agents of their duty to contact emergency services and notify the pharmacist on duty after identifying an emergency.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As an organisation, we have taken steps to address this by making our delivery agents aware of their duty to contact emergency services and inform the pharmacist on duty as soon as practical.”

Source location

Response from Orchard 2000 Pharmacy
Page 1 · response
Published 18 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Supervise delivery agents’ completion of the safety training and provide support through pharmacy managers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have now enrolled all our delivery agents for this programme and they are being supervised by our pharmacy managers to ensure completion and support with the programme.”

Source location

Response from Orchard 2000 Pharmacy
Page 1 · response
Published 18 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The regulator does not mandate training details for particular scenarios because pharmacy support staff have diverse roles.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Pharmacy owners are also accountable for making sure their unregistered staff meet our requirements for training. The scope of work of pharmacy support staff is hugely diverse, so we do not mandate specific detail about particular scenarios. We specify a set of learning outcomes which all support staff must achieve. These include outcomes relating to:”

Source location

Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
Page 2 · response
Published 18 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Pharmacy owners are responsible for ensuring unregistered staff receive appropriate training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our guidance states that pharmacy owners are responsible for making sure that the whole pharmacy team – both registered pharmacy professionals and all unregistered staff – provide safe and effective care and pharmacy services. Staff members, and anyone involved in providing pharmacy services, must be competent and empowered to safeguard the health, safety and wellbeing of patients and the public in all that they do.”

Source location

Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
Page 2 · response
Published 18 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delivery drivers are not directly regulated by the regulator.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Delivery drivers themselves are not registered or directly regulated by us; nevertheless we have published guidance to ensure a safe and effective pharmacy team and we set requirements for the training of unregistered staff (which includes delivery drivers).”

Source location

Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
Page 2 · response
Published 18 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The regulator’s role covers registered pharmacists and pharmacy technicians, not unregistered delivery drivers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, not all those who work within a pharmacy company, such as delivery drivers, are required to be registered professionals, and our role only covers individuals who are registered pharmacists or pharmacy technicians.”

Source location

Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
Page 1 · response
Published 18 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delivery drivers are not generally expected to receive training specifically for managing a service-user’s fall at home or to enter patients’ homes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This matter relates to pharmacy support staff. The roles and responsibilities of pharmacy support staff, such as delivery drivers, will be defined by the pharmacy. They, however, must be suitably qualified for the roles that they do. GPhC requirements for the education and training of pharmacy support staff includes being able to recognise and raise appropriate safeguarding concerns, particularly involving vulnerable adults. However, delivery drivers would not be expected to receive training specifically with how to manage a situation where a service-user has had a fall at home, and would also not normally enter patient’s homes.”

Source location

Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
Page 1 · response
Published 18 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The pharmacy defines support staff roles, while its Superintendent pharmacist is responsible for ensuring their training and competencies meet requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This matter relates to pharmacy support staff. The roles and responsibilities of pharmacy support staff, such as delivery drivers, will be defined by the pharmacy. They, however, must be suitably qualified for the roles that they do. GPhC requirements for the education and training of pharmacy support staff includes being able to recognise and raise appropriate safeguarding concerns, particularly involving vulnerable adults. However, delivery drivers would not be expected to receive training specifically with how to manage a situation where a service-user has had a fall at home, and would also not normally enter patient’s homes.”

Source location

Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
Page 1 · response
Published 18 July 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Publish guidance promoting safe and effective pharmacy teams, including unregistered delivery staff.

    Stated by General Pharmaceutical CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 July 2023.
  2. 2

    Write to the Superintendent pharmacist reminding them to ensure support staff training and competencies meet requirements.

    Stated by General Pharmaceutical CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 18 July 2023.
  3. 3

    Continue evaluating care provision and seek additional necessary training programmes.

    Stated by Excel Chemists T/A Orchard 2000 PharmacyStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 18 July 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish guidance promoting safe and effective pharmacy teams, including unregistered delivery staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Delivery drivers themselves are not registered or directly regulated by us; nevertheless we have published guidance to ensure a safe and effective pharmacy team and we set requirements for the training of unregistered staff (which includes delivery drivers).”

Source location

Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
Page 2 · response
Published 18 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Write to the Superintendent pharmacist reminding them to ensure support staff training and competencies meet requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This matter relates to pharmacy support staff. The roles and responsibilities of pharmacy support staff, such as delivery drivers, will be defined by the pharmacy. They, however, must be suitably qualified for the roles that they do. GPhC requirements for the education and training of pharmacy support staff includes being able to recognise and raise appropriate safeguarding concerns, particularly involving vulnerable adults. However, delivery drivers would not be expected to receive training specifically with how to manage a situation where a service-user has had a fall at home, and would also not normally enter patient’s homes.”

Source location

Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
Page 1 · response
Published 18 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue evaluating care provision and seek additional necessary training programmes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We do hope that our response has demonstrated our commitment to the provision of excellent care for our service users and we are committed to evaluating this from time to time as well as seeking out any other necessary training programmes.”

Source location

Response from Orchard 2000 Pharmacy
Page 1 · response
Published 18 July 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026