PFD report

Elizabeth Robinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Mar 2021•Gwent

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure to disseminate internal investigation findings to relevant nursing staff
  2. Failure to complete falls risk assessments and documentation
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risksPart of recurring concern: Unreliable documentation of falls-risk management
  3. Insufficient nursing staffing levels for delivery of safe patient care
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Capture patient acuity data to determine workforce requirements.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 March 2021.
  2. Action

    Share interim post-fall guidance and broader thematic findings with medical and nursing staff across the Health Board.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 March 2021.
  3. Action

    Complete an acuity audit and triangulated recalculation to determine appropriate nurse staffing levels on Ysbyty Ystrad Fawr Community Wards.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 March 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The planned nursing roster was met, and the requested additional staffing for enhanced care was escalated and filled when the fall occurred.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to disseminate internal investigation findings to relevant nursing staff

Wider context from the report

“2. Serious Concerns report findings At the inquest, Mrs Rowlands described the omissions in the falls risk assessment process and the steps that are now being taken to ensure that staff complete the documentation properly. It is my understanding that the internal investigation is an essential component of organisational learning to improve the quality of care to patients and also prevent future deaths. Mrs Rowlands informed me that falls were the greatest risk posed to patients by the Health Board. I was therefore concerned to hear that neither of the nursing staff who gave evidence had seen the findings of the internal investigation some 1 years and 4 months since Mrs Robinson’s death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete falls risk assessments and documentation

Wider context from the report

“1. Staffing Levels Aneurin Bevan University Health Board undertook an internal investigation which was presented at the inquest by ████████ and ████████ confirmed that Mrs Robinson had not been correctly assessed and warranted a higher level of supervision to minimise the risk of her falling. Whilst the documentation was not completed, two nurses gave evidence and I was reassured that they both understood that Mrs Robinson was at high risk of falls and were monitoring her as closely as possible with the staffing complement available. I was informed that on the ward at YYF there were usually 3 members of nursing staff to care for 15 patients. Mrs Robinson was in a cohorted group which meant that 1 member of staff was assigned to observe a group of 4 patients at all times. This left 2 nurses for the remaining 11 patients. The nurses who gave evidence both told me that they rarely managed to get their full breaks (40 minutes in a 12 hour shift) and were constantly in a position where they did not feel they could deliver a safe standard of care to the patients. Mrs Rowlands confirmed that staffing levels were not considered during the investigation and it was further confirmed that these apparently low staffing levels still exist. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Unreliable documentation of falls-risk management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient nursing staffing levels for delivery of safe patient care

Wider context from the report

“1. Staffing Levels Aneurin Bevan University Health Board undertook an internal investigation which was presented at the inquest by ████████ and ████████ confirmed that Mrs Robinson had not been correctly assessed and warranted a higher level of supervision to minimise the risk of her falling. Whilst the documentation was not completed, two nurses gave evidence and I was reassured that they both understood that Mrs Robinson was at high risk of falls and were monitoring her as closely as possible with the staffing complement available. I was informed that on the ward at YYF there were usually 3 members of nursing staff to care for 15 patients. Mrs Robinson was in a cohorted group which meant that 1 member of staff was assigned to observe a group of 4 patients at all times. This left 2 nurses for the remaining 11 patients. The nurses who gave evidence both told me that they rarely managed to get their full breaks (40 minutes in a 12 hour shift) and were constantly in a position where they did not feel they could deliver a safe standard of care to the patients. Mrs Rowlands confirmed that staffing levels were not considered during the investigation and it was further confirmed that these apparently low staffing levels still exist. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider staffing levels in internal investigations

Wider context from the report

“1. Staffing Levels Aneurin Bevan University Health Board undertook an internal investigation which was presented at the inquest by ████████ and ████████ confirmed that Mrs Robinson had not been correctly assessed and warranted a higher level of supervision to minimise the risk of her falling. Whilst the documentation was not completed, two nurses gave evidence and I was reassured that they both understood that Mrs Robinson was at high risk of falls and were monitoring her as closely as possible with the staffing complement available. I was informed that on the ward at YYF there were usually 3 members of nursing staff to care for 15 patients. Mrs Robinson was in a cohorted group which meant that 1 member of staff was assigned to observe a group of 4 patients at all times. This left 2 nurses for the remaining 11 patients. The nurses who gave evidence both told me that they rarely managed to get their full breaks (40 minutes in a 12 hour shift) and were constantly in a position where they did not feel they could deliver a safe standard of care to the patients. Mrs Rowlands confirmed that staffing levels were not considered during the investigation and it was further confirmed that these apparently low staffing levels still exist. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Omissions in the falls risk assessment process

Wider context from the report

“2. Serious Concerns report findings At the inquest, Mrs Rowlands described the omissions in the falls risk assessment process and the steps that are now being taken to ensure that staff complete the documentation properly. It is my understanding that the internal investigation is an essential component of organisational learning to improve the quality of care to patients and also prevent future deaths. Mrs Rowlands informed me that falls were the greatest risk posed to patients by the Health Board. I was therefore concerned to hear that neither of the nursing staff who gave evidence had seen the findings of the internal investigation some 1 years and 4 months since Mrs Robinson’s death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Capture patient acuity data to determine workforce requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A very recent triangulated approach to review Community Ward establishments in YYF has been undertaken by the Head of Nursing for Nevill Hall Hospital (NHH) and YYF. The purpose of this is to review the current ward establishments and determine if they are fit for purpose to meet the acuity and dependency of patients, considering all available quality metrics to inform and support additional requirements. In line with the Nursing Staff Levels (Wales) Act 2016 (NSLWA), a full acuity audit will take place during the month of June. This will provide essential intelligence to support a triangulated re-calculation in August 2021, to determine appropriate nurse staffing levels on all Community Wards in YYF. YYF has been proactive in its approach to determine patients’ acuity and commenced acuity capture as of April 2021 to determine workforce requirements.”

Source location

2021-0072-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 23 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share interim post-fall guidance and broader thematic findings with medical and nursing staff across the Health Board.

Verbatim wording from the response

“and YYF was established following this incident and interim post-fall guidance has been widely shared with medical and nursing staff across the Health Board to ensure awareness of, and compliance with Health Board policy. Whilst the report itself was not shared with the staff involved, the broader findings have been shared widely.”

Source location

2021-0072-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 23 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete an acuity audit and triangulated recalculation to determine appropriate nurse staffing levels on Ysbyty Ystrad Fawr Community Wards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A very recent triangulated approach to review Community Ward establishments in YYF has been undertaken by the Head of Nursing for Nevill Hall Hospital (NHH) and YYF. The purpose of this is to review the current ward establishments and determine if they are fit for purpose to meet the acuity and dependency of patients, considering all available quality metrics to inform and support additional requirements. In line with the Nursing Staff Levels (Wales) Act 2016 (NSLWA), a full acuity audit will take place during the month of June. This will provide essential intelligence to support a triangulated re-calculation in August 2021, to determine appropriate nurse staffing levels on all Community Wards in YYF. YYF has been proactive in its approach to determine patients’ acuity and commenced acuity capture as of April 2021 to determine workforce requirements.”

Source location

2021-0072-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 23 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review Community Ward establishments against patient acuity, dependency and quality metrics to determine whether staffing levels are fit for purpose.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A very recent triangulated approach to review Community Ward establishments in YYF has been undertaken by the Head of Nursing for Nevill Hall Hospital (NHH) and YYF. The purpose of this is to review the current ward establishments and determine if they are fit for purpose to meet the acuity and dependency of patients, considering all available quality metrics to inform and support additional requirements. In line with the Nursing Staff Levels (Wales) Act 2016 (NSLWA), a full acuity audit will take place during the month of June. This will provide essential intelligence to support a triangulated re-calculation in August 2021, to determine appropriate nurse staffing levels on all Community Wards in YYF. YYF has been proactive in its approach to determine patients’ acuity and commenced acuity capture as of April 2021 to determine workforce requirements.”

Source location

2021-0072-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 23 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Trial standardised serious incident investigation meeting agendas, review them using trial feedback, and share the revised templates across the Health Board.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the Team is trialling standardised template agendas for use at Serious Incident investigation meetings to act as prompts to ensure that key points such as sharing report findings with stakeholders and with individual staff involved are implemented. A copy of these is enclosed. These templates will be reviewed, modified to reflect any feedback from the trial phase, and shared for use across the Health Board.”

Source location

2021-0072-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 23 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a falls thematic review for Ysbyty Aneurin Bevan and Ysbyty Ystrad Fawr.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Unfortunately, in this instance, the investigation report into the events leading to Mrs Robinson’s death was not shared with the staff involved in a timely manner. However, a falls thematic review for Ysbyty Aneurin Bevan (YAB)”

Source location

2021-0072-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 23 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The planned nursing roster was met, and the requested additional staffing for enhanced care was escalated and filled when the fall occurred.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Aneurin Bevan University Health Board (ABUHB) has processes in place across its sites to escalate any staffing deficits within a planned roster and/or any requests for additional staffing requirements. At the time of Mrs Robinson’s fall, a Nurse Staffing Escalation Policy (NSEP) was in place. This articulates everyone’s responsibility to maintain appropriate nurse staffing levels and sets clear actions if there is a deviation from what is required. Having reviewed the roster on the night of 20-21 October 2019, when Mrs Robinson fell on Oakdale Ward, it is noted that the planned nursing roster was met.”

Source location

2021-0072-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 23 March 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Implement and recommence training for Investigating Officers to support thorough serious incident investigations.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 March 2021.
  2. 2

    Establish a substantive Health Care Support Worker pool at Ysbyty Ystrad Fawr to support enhanced care.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 March 2021.
  3. 3

    Employ additional substantive Health Care Support Workers across specialities to improve care continuity and patient experience.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 March 2021.
  4. 4

    Create a standard approach for serious incident investigations across the Corporate Serious Incident Team and Divisions.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 March 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement and recommence training for Investigating Officers to support thorough serious incident investigations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Nonetheless, it is acknowledged that there has been some variation within the Health Board as to how investigations are carried out as some investigations are carried out by the Health Board’s Corporate Serious Incident Team, whilst others are carried out by individual Divisions. To address this, the Corporate Serious Incident Team has been working hard to create a standard approach for its own use and for the Divisions to follow. This has involved implementing a training programme for Investigating Officers to ensure that investigations are carried out thoroughly. This programme was temporarily paused during the second wave of the pandemic whilst clinical work was prioritised, but has recently recommenced.”

Source location

2021-0072-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 23 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a substantive Health Care Support Worker pool at Ysbyty Ystrad Fawr to support enhanced care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Health Board acknowledges that enhanced care is a challenge and consequently, in September 2020, established an Ysbyty Ystrad Fawr (YYF) Health Care Support Worker (HCSW) pool, in order to support the enhanced level of care required.”

Source location

2021-0072-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 23 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Employ additional substantive Health Care Support Workers across specialities to improve care continuity and patient experience.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the extensive work on the recruitment of Registered Nurses the Health Board has also supported a significant move to increase the substantive HCSW workforce across all specialities. An additional 145WTE HCSW’s have been employed since July 2020, providing continuity in care and improved patient experience.”

Source location

2021-0072-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 23 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create a standard approach for serious incident investigations across the Corporate Serious Incident Team and Divisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Nonetheless, it is acknowledged that there has been some variation within the Health Board as to how investigations are carried out as some investigations are carried out by the Health Board’s Corporate Serious Incident Team, whilst others are carried out by individual Divisions. To address this, the Corporate Serious Incident Team has been working hard to create a standard approach for its own use and for the Divisions to follow. This has involved implementing a training programme for Investigating Officers to ensure that investigations are carried out thoroughly. This programme was temporarily paused during the second wave of the pandemic whilst clinical work was prioritised, but has recently recommenced.”

Source location

2021-0072-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 23 March 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026