PFD report

Ethel Doreen Reed · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Feb 2024•East Riding and Hull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
21

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure of the electronic patient record system to identify authors of changes to finalised discharge letters
    Part of recurring concern: Electronic patient records failing to make relevant clinical information available and actionablePart of recurring concern: Unreliable traceability of retrospective amendments to safety records
  2. Risk of cross infection from misallocated patients’ personal effects
  3. Lack of continuity of nursing staff on winter-pressure wards
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide continuity of care staffing
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Develop a safe methodology for opening additional urgent capacity during winter pressures or increased demand.

    Stated by NHS Humber Health PartnershipStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 February 2024.
  2. Action

    Complete an internal review and consult other Lorenzo users about the Immediate Discharge Summary author-identification process.

    Stated by NHS Humber Health PartnershipStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 February 2024.
  3. Action

    Establish permanent ward teams and leadership, with daily Ward Sister presence and clear escalation signposting.

    Stated by NHS Humber Health PartnershipStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 February 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.5

  1. Position

    The proposed Immediate Discharge Summary process change cannot begin fully until required project, system and stakeholder resources become available and internal approval is completed.

    Stated by NHS Humber Health PartnershipUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the electronic patient record system to identify authors of changes to finalised discharge letters

Wider context from the report

“(2) An issue with the Lorenzo electronic patient record keeping system has been identified in respect of the system not auto populating the identification of the author of any changes made in the immediate discharge letter (IDL) after it has been finalised. This could lead to miscommunication of critical issues and difficulties in establishing who made what decisions which could lead to delays in treatment in the next post discharge setting which in turn could lead to future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Electronic patient records failing to make relevant clinical information available and actionable; Unreliable traceability of retrospective amendments to safety records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Risk of cross infection from misallocated patients’ personal effects

Wider context from the report

“(1) H130 is on the 13th floor of Hull Royal Infirmary. It has an East and a West wing and spans the full floor. It was opened in response to winter pressures. At that time, in January 2023, Hull Royal Infirmary was placed under significant pressure in terms of admissions and staffing. The ward been open only a matter of some two weeks by the time Mrs Reed was transferred to that ward. Despite being medically fit for discharge upon arrival on that ward Mrs Reed’s condition worsened and family raised concerns as best they could but they reported that the ward was chaotic and that staff would tell them they had only just found out they were working on the ward before their shift started and there was no consistency of nursing staff on the ward. Mrs Reed was dehydrated and family report that there was a paucity of personal care afforded on that ward. There was a risk of cross infection as patients’ personal effects such as toiletries were not with the right patients and had to be located by family. There was no established cohort of permanent staff on the ward at that time and no signposting to the ward sister or matron and therefore no way of patients, their friends, or their families being able to have a clear escalation pathway to ventilate concerns. Although HUTH now have an established team and leadership chain on Ward H130 there is a real concern that wards opened in response to winter pressures in the future in any busy hospital may give rise to the same peripatetic staffing regime, that is to say, agency staff and no fixed team in place and a lack of visible leadership. This could lead to the deterioration of patients not being recognised if there is no continuity of care by the same team of nursing staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of continuity of nursing staff on winter-pressure wards

Wider context from the report

“(1) H130 is on the 13th floor of Hull Royal Infirmary. It has an East and a West wing and spans the full floor. It was opened in response to winter pressures. At that time, in January 2023, Hull Royal Infirmary was placed under significant pressure in terms of admissions and staffing. The ward been open only a matter of some two weeks by the time Mrs Reed was transferred to that ward. Despite being medically fit for discharge upon arrival on that ward Mrs Reed’s condition worsened and family raised concerns as best they could but they reported that the ward was chaotic and that staff would tell them they had only just found out they were working on the ward before their shift started and there was no consistency of nursing staff on the ward. Mrs Reed was dehydrated and family report that there was a paucity of personal care afforded on that ward. There was a risk of cross infection as patients’ personal effects such as toiletries were not with the right patients and had to be located by family. There was no established cohort of permanent staff on the ward at that time and no signposting to the ward sister or matron and therefore no way of patients, their friends, or their families being able to have a clear escalation pathway to ventilate concerns. Although HUTH now have an established team and leadership chain on Ward H130 there is a real concern that wards opened in response to winter pressures in the future in any busy hospital may give rise to the same peripatetic staffing regime, that is to say, agency staff and no fixed team in place and a lack of visible leadership. This could lead to the deterioration of patients not being recognised if there is no continuity of care by the same team of nursing staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide continuity of care staffing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of visible ward leadership and a clear escalation pathway

Wider context from the report

“(1) H130 is on the 13th floor of Hull Royal Infirmary. It has an East and a West wing and spans the full floor. It was opened in response to winter pressures. At that time, in January 2023, Hull Royal Infirmary was placed under significant pressure in terms of admissions and staffing. The ward been open only a matter of some two weeks by the time Mrs Reed was transferred to that ward. Despite being medically fit for discharge upon arrival on that ward Mrs Reed’s condition worsened and family raised concerns as best they could but they reported that the ward was chaotic and that staff would tell them they had only just found out they were working on the ward before their shift started and there was no consistency of nursing staff on the ward. Mrs Reed was dehydrated and family report that there was a paucity of personal care afforded on that ward. There was a risk of cross infection as patients’ personal effects such as toiletries were not with the right patients and had to be located by family. There was no established cohort of permanent staff on the ward at that time and no signposting to the ward sister or matron and therefore no way of patients, their friends, or their families being able to have a clear escalation pathway to ventilate concerns. Although HUTH now have an established team and leadership chain on Ward H130 there is a real concern that wards opened in response to winter pressures in the future in any busy hospital may give rise to the same peripatetic staffing regime, that is to say, agency staff and no fixed team in place and a lack of visible leadership. This could lead to the deterioration of patients not being recognised if there is no continuity of care by the same team of nursing staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide effective on-duty clinical leadership.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Paucity of personal care on the ward

Wider context from the report

“(1) H130 is on the 13th floor of Hull Royal Infirmary. It has an East and a West wing and spans the full floor. It was opened in response to winter pressures. At that time, in January 2023, Hull Royal Infirmary was placed under significant pressure in terms of admissions and staffing. The ward been open only a matter of some two weeks by the time Mrs Reed was transferred to that ward. Despite being medically fit for discharge upon arrival on that ward Mrs Reed’s condition worsened and family raised concerns as best they could but they reported that the ward was chaotic and that staff would tell them they had only just found out they were working on the ward before their shift started and there was no consistency of nursing staff on the ward. Mrs Reed was dehydrated and family report that there was a paucity of personal care afforded on that ward. There was a risk of cross infection as patients’ personal effects such as toiletries were not with the right patients and had to be located by family. There was no established cohort of permanent staff on the ward at that time and no signposting to the ward sister or matron and therefore no way of patients, their friends, or their families being able to have a clear escalation pathway to ventilate concerns. Although HUTH now have an established team and leadership chain on Ward H130 there is a real concern that wards opened in response to winter pressures in the future in any busy hospital may give rise to the same peripatetic staffing regime, that is to say, agency staff and no fixed team in place and a lack of visible leadership. This could lead to the deterioration of patients not being recognised if there is no continuity of care by the same team of nursing staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide fundamental personal care and welfare.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a safe methodology for opening additional urgent capacity during winter pressures or increased demand.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has made great strides in improving the care, treatment and experience for patients transferred to the 13th floor as a No Criteria to Reside base and recognises that, at times, additional capacity during winter pressures or increased times of demand on the service it will need to opened. The Trust can provide assurance that learning from opening of the 13th floor has been undertaken and informed a planned methodology for opening additional capacity on an urgent basis, safely. The Trust is now over-recruited against its nursing staff and is able to lean on that resource as required, reducing the need for bank and agency staff.”

Source location

Response from Humber Health Partnership Hull Royal Infirmary
Page 3 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete an internal review and consult other Lorenzo users about the Immediate Discharge Summary author-identification process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, we have completed an internal review of the current process and consulted with other Lorenzo users. The outcome of these discussions is that the Trust is now looking to change the current process of completing the IDS as detailed below:”

Source location

Response from Humber Health Partnership Hull Royal Infirmary
Page 4 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish permanent ward teams and leadership, with daily Ward Sister presence and clear escalation signposting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust can confirm that there is now a very well established team on the 13th floor, including leadership, nursing and medical teams. The Ward Sisters are present on the wards on a daily basis with clear signposting for patients, relatives and carers if they need it. The Ward Sisters have set up ‘relative clinics’, which provides dedicated time for patients or relatives to meet the Ward Sisters to ask questions, seek advice or raise concerns. The wards promote patient feedback via Friends and Family Test (FFT) and displays feedback, results and actions taken by the areas. The wards also have volunteer presence, activity champions and visits from the therapy dogs.”

Source location

Response from Humber Health Partnership Hull Royal Infirmary
Page 3 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain additional nursing capacity above establishment to reduce reliance on bank and agency staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has made great strides in improving the care, treatment and experience for patients transferred to the 13th floor as a No Criteria to Reside base and recognises that, at times, additional capacity during winter pressures or increased times of demand on the service it will need to opened. The Trust can provide assurance that learning from opening of the 13th floor has been undertaken and informed a planned methodology for opening additional capacity on an urgent basis, safely. The Trust is now over-recruited against its nursing staff and is able to lean on that resource as required, reducing the need for bank and agency staff.”

Source location

Response from Humber Health Partnership Hull Royal Infirmary
Page 3 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide Ward Sister relative clinics for patients, relatives and carers to raise questions or concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust can confirm that there is now a very well established team on the 13th floor, including leadership, nursing and medical teams. The Ward Sisters are present on the wards on a daily basis with clear signposting for patients, relatives and carers if they need it. The Ward Sisters have set up ‘relative clinics’, which provides dedicated time for patients or relatives to meet the Ward Sisters to ask questions, seek advice or raise concerns. The wards promote patient feedback via Friends and Family Test (FFT) and displays feedback, results and actions taken by the areas. The wards also have volunteer presence, activity champions and visits from the therapy dogs.”

Source location

Response from Humber Health Partnership Hull Royal Infirmary
Page 3 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor medicine-ward staffing levels and associated improvement actions until they are fully implemented, embedded, and sustained.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since the last inspection, the trust made improvements to their staffing on medicine wards. All associated post inspection action plans for staffing have been completed. CQC regularly monitors staffing in terms of fill rates (planned vs actual), reduction in the number of vacancies, improved turnover rates and improved sickness rates. CQC continues to monitor staffing levels to ensure these actions are fully implemented, embedded, and sustained.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 3 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The proposed Immediate Discharge Summary process change cannot begin fully until required project, system and stakeholder resources become available and internal approval is completed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This piece of work will require resources of Project Management, Change Management, CDC Form Developer, System Support and Information and reporting. There will also be significant stakeholder engagement required including the pharmacy team. Due to this and other similar concerns raised recently, it has been recommended that this piece of work be given a priority 1 and resources allocated as soon as they become available. The timescales for deployment will depend on the approach, but would likely begin with those areas with a significant number of IDS templates set up currently.”

Source location

Response from Humber Health Partnership Hull Royal Infirmary
Page 4 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A single remedy to identify all authors of Immediate Discharge Summary changes cannot yet be identified because non-clinical staff manage summaries before finalisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have not yet been able to identify a single remedy to the issue raised around the identification of all authors making changes to the Immediate Discharge Summary (IDS). The primary barrier to a simple solution to this issue is that there are often non-clinical staff involved in the management of the IDS before it is finalised.”

Source location

Response from Humber Health Partnership Hull Royal Infirmary
Page 4 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Established H130 staffing, leadership, escalation arrangements and a planned methodology are considered sufficient to safely open additional winter capacity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust can confirm that there is now a very well established team on the 13th floor, including leadership, nursing and medical teams. The Ward Sisters are present on the wards on a daily basis with clear signposting for patients, relatives and carers if they need it. The Ward Sisters have set up ‘relative clinics’, which provides dedicated time for patients or relatives to meet the Ward Sisters to ask questions, seek advice or raise concerns. The wards promote patient feedback via Friends and Family Test (FFT) and displays feedback, results and actions taken by the areas. The wards also have volunteer presence, activity champions and visits from the therapy dogs.”

Source location

Response from Humber Health Partnership Hull Royal Infirmary
Page 3 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for the Lorenzo system relationship sits directly with trusts and the supplier because NHS England has no contract.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your Report also raised a concern around the Lorenzo electronic patient record keeping system not auto-populating the identification of the author of any changes made in the immediate discharge letter after it has been finalised. NHS England no longer has a contract with Dedalus (Lorenzo system) and therefore the relationship sits directly with the Trust(s) and supplier.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Staffing at individual NHS trusts is their responsibility, while national workforce support continues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While staffing is the responsibility of individual Trusts, growing the healthcare workforce is one of NHS England’s chief priorities and we were pleased to achieve the government target of having 50,000 more nurses working in the NHS by November last year than in 2019. Nurse, Allied Healthcare Professionals, and wider health and care vacancies remain a pressing concern which we are addressing through the delivery of the NHS Long Term Workforce Plan, offering flexible routes into the professions including apprenticeships and working with employers to support retention of the current workforce.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.15

  1. 1

    Promote and display patient feedback through Friends and Family Test results and resulting actions.

    Stated by NHS Humber Health PartnershipStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 February 2024.
  2. 2

    Implement and progress an improvement plan for the 13th floor following multidisciplinary inspection and patient-experience learning.

    Stated by NHS Humber Health PartnershipStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 February 2024.
  3. 3

    Provide volunteer support, activity champions and therapy-dog visits on the wards.

    Stated by NHS Humber Health PartnershipStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 February 2024.
  4. 4

    Operate H130 East and West as longer-term No Criteria to Reside wards for discharge-to-assess multidisciplinary assessment.

    Stated by NHS Humber Health PartnershipStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 February 2024.
  5. 5

    Redesign Immediate Discharge Summary documentation to use clinical data-capture forms with mandatory core data and variable fields.

    Stated by NHS Humber Health PartnershipStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 February 2024.
  6. 6

    Obtain internal Digital Information and Systems approval for redesigning Immediate Discharge Summary documentation using Lorenzo clinical data-capture forms.

    Stated by NHS Humber Health PartnershipStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 February 2024.
  7. 7

    Monitor patient access and flow across medical care wards, including patient moves, length of stay, delayed discharges, and pathways.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 February 2024.
  8. 8

    Monitor national patient-safety incident and serious-incident information through NRLS and StEIS as part of inspection activity.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 February 2024.
  9. 9

    Continue monitoring information received about the service and use regulatory enforcement powers when breaches are identified.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 February 2024.
  10. 10

    Check the provider’s regulatory compliance during the next service inspection using the single assessment framework.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 February 2024.
  11. 11

    Engage monthly with the trust, review evidence, and monitor progress against action plans to ensure improvements are sustained.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 February 2024.
  12. 12

    Set out the national approach for winter planning and operational resilience to ICBs and Trusts.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 February 2024.
  13. 13

    Increase NHS nursing workforce by 50,000 compared with 2019 levels.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 February 2024.
  14. 14

    Operate the Regulation 28 Working Group to discuss reports and share learning across national and regional NHS services.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 February 2024.
  15. 15

    Deliver the NHS Long Term Workforce Plan through flexible professional entry routes and workforce-retention support.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 February 2024.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    CQC cannot currently undertake further national analysis because NHS England is transforming patient safety data systems.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Promote and display patient feedback through Friends and Family Test results and resulting actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust can confirm that there is now a very well established team on the 13th floor, including leadership, nursing and medical teams. The Ward Sisters are present on the wards on a daily basis with clear signposting for patients, relatives and carers if they need it. The Ward Sisters have set up ‘relative clinics’, which provides dedicated time for patients or relatives to meet the Ward Sisters to ask questions, seek advice or raise concerns. The wards promote patient feedback via Friends and Family Test (FFT) and displays feedback, results and actions taken by the areas. The wards also have volunteer presence, activity champions and visits from the therapy dogs.”

Source location

Response from Humber Health Partnership Hull Royal Infirmary
Page 3 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement and progress an improvement plan for the 13th floor following multidisciplinary inspection and patient-experience learning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust acknowledges that this new model was embedding into practice in the summer of 2023 and did require improvement. Since the ward opened, the Trust has taken the opportunity to make the required improvements, inform patient experience and address recommendations following an internal multi-disciplinary inspection to the 13th floor. This visit was led by the Director of Quality Governance and had attendance from the Chairman and a Non-Executive Director for Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Practice Development Matron, Compliance Team as well as Health and Safety and external representation from Kingston upon Hull Healthwatch. An improvement plan for the 13th floor has been in place since October 2023, with progress against delivery of the plan. The improvement plan is attached at Appendix A for information.”

Source location

Response from Humber Health Partnership Hull Royal Infirmary
Page 3 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide volunteer support, activity champions and therapy-dog visits on the wards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust can confirm that there is now a very well established team on the 13th floor, including leadership, nursing and medical teams. The Ward Sisters are present on the wards on a daily basis with clear signposting for patients, relatives and carers if they need it. The Ward Sisters have set up ‘relative clinics’, which provides dedicated time for patients or relatives to meet the Ward Sisters to ask questions, seek advice or raise concerns. The wards promote patient feedback via Friends and Family Test (FFT) and displays feedback, results and actions taken by the areas. The wards also have volunteer presence, activity champions and visits from the therapy dogs.”

Source location

Response from Humber Health Partnership Hull Royal Infirmary
Page 3 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate H130 East and West as longer-term No Criteria to Reside wards for discharge-to-assess multidisciplinary assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In June 2023, in response to these capacity issues, the Trust took the action to use the 13th floor and open ‘No Criteria to Reside Wards’ on the 13th floor (H130 East and H130 West) at Hull Royal Infirmary on a longer term footing.”

Source location

Response from Humber Health Partnership Hull Royal Infirmary
Page 2 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Redesign Immediate Discharge Summary documentation to use clinical data-capture forms with mandatory core data and variable fields.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust currently have in excess of 60 different IDS templates created as clinical notes in the Lorenzo system. A review of the data items within these documents shows approximately 40 data items consistent across most of the templates and 46 variable data items. Templates have been created at the request of departments or users to accommodate variable data required between departments, clinicians or procedures and treatments. We now believe that this level of variability would be more appropriately managed using the clinical data capture (CDC) forms in Lorenzo and not in the IDS. This change would allow mandatory data to be captured for all, and the variables to be added as and when required. This in turn can create a final clinical note at discharge that is reflective of the individualised care received by the patient.”

Source location

Response from Humber Health Partnership Hull Royal Infirmary
Page 4 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Obtain internal Digital Information and Systems approval for redesigning Immediate Discharge Summary documentation using Lorenzo clinical data-capture forms.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust currently have in excess of 60 different IDS templates created as clinical notes in the Lorenzo system. A review of the data items within these documents shows approximately 40 data items consistent across most of the templates and 46 variable data items. Templates have been created at the request of departments or users to accommodate variable data required between departments, clinicians or procedures and treatments. We now believe that this level of variability would be more appropriately managed using the clinical data capture (CDC) forms in Lorenzo and not in the IDS. This change would allow mandatory data to be captured for all, and the variables to be added as and when required. This in turn can create a final clinical note at discharge that is reflective of the individualised care received by the patient.”

Source location

Response from Humber Health Partnership Hull Royal Infirmary
Page 4 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor patient access and flow across medical care wards, including patient moves, length of stay, delayed discharges, and pathways.

Verbatim wording from the response

“CQC regularly monitors the access and flow of patients in and out of medical care wards. There has been measured improvements with a reduction in patient moves, improved length of stay, reduction in delayed discharges and improved patient pathways. All associated post inspection action plans have been completed.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 3 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor national patient-safety incident and serious-incident information through NRLS and StEIS as part of inspection activity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to our inspection activity, inspectors regularly monitor the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) and Strategic Executive Information System (StEIS), reviewing a Trust’s National Patient Safety Incident Reports and Serious Incident investigations data. Currently these data sources are going through a significant transformation, as NHS England implements the new Learn from Patient Safety Events system, which limits CQC’s ability to carry out further national analysis until this has been completed.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 4 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring information received about the service and use regulatory enforcement powers when breaches are identified.

Verbatim wording from the response

“CQC will continue to monitor information we receive about the service. Where CQC identifies that regulations are not being met, we will use our enforcement powers to require improvements to be made.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 4 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Check the provider’s regulatory compliance during the next service inspection using the single assessment framework.

Verbatim wording from the response

“CQC will also check the provider’s compliance with the regulations on our next inspection of the service using our new single assessment framework methodology in accordance with the CQC regulatory remit. CQC will highlight any repeated or new breaches of regulation and ask the trust to make necessary improvements.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 4 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage monthly with the trust, review evidence, and monitor progress against action plans to ensure improvements are sustained.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The trust subsequently provided CQC with a copy of their post inspection action plan detailing the immediate action taken in response to the concerns raised at inspection. The trust provided details of the longer-term actions required to ensure the improvements made would become sustained and embedded.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Set out the national approach for winter planning and operational resilience to ICBs and Trusts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Winter remains a challenging period for NHS organisations, amidst significant existing pressures. Recovery plans, such as those for urgent and emergency care (UEC) and primary care, together with broader strategic and operational plans have also provided a firm basis to support NHS organisations to prepare for challenging winter periods. In July 2023, NHS England wrote to Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) and Trusts setting out the national approach to 2023/24 winter planning and delivering operational resilience. This set out four areas of focus for health systems:”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase NHS nursing workforce by 50,000 compared with 2019 levels.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While staffing is the responsibility of individual Trusts, growing the healthcare workforce is one of NHS England’s chief priorities and we were pleased to achieve the government target of having 50,000 more nurses working in the NHS by November last year than in 2019. Nurse, Allied Healthcare Professionals, and wider health and care vacancies remain a pressing concern which we are addressing through the delivery of the NHS Long Term Workforce Plan, offering flexible routes into the professions including apprenticeships and working with employers to support retention of the current workforce.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate the Regulation 28 Working Group to discuss reports and share learning across national and regional NHS services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver the NHS Long Term Workforce Plan through flexible professional entry routes and workforce-retention support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While staffing is the responsibility of individual Trusts, growing the healthcare workforce is one of NHS England’s chief priorities and we were pleased to achieve the government target of having 50,000 more nurses working in the NHS by November last year than in 2019. Nurse, Allied Healthcare Professionals, and wider health and care vacancies remain a pressing concern which we are addressing through the delivery of the NHS Long Term Workforce Plan, offering flexible routes into the professions including apprenticeships and working with employers to support retention of the current workforce.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

CQC cannot currently undertake further national analysis because NHS England is transforming patient safety data systems.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to our inspection activity, inspectors regularly monitor the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) and Strategic Executive Information System (StEIS), reviewing a Trust’s National Patient Safety Incident Reports and Serious Incident investigations data. Currently these data sources are going through a significant transformation, as NHS England implements the new Learn from Patient Safety Events system, which limits CQC’s ability to carry out further national analysis until this has been completed.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 4 · response
Published 21 February 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026