PFD report

Geoffrey Ellis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 13 May 2016•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to complete important clinical documents
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records
  2. Illegible clinical records
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Undertake monthly live spot audits of 30 inpatient records to improve written record quality and communication.

    Stated by Stockport NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 13 May 2016.
  2. Action

    Complete the rollout of the TrakCare electronic patient record system to consolidate patient information and prevent incomplete or illegible records.

    Stated by Stockport NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 13 May 2016.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete important clinical documents

Wider context from the report

“Illegible clinical records and/or a failure to complete important documents creates a serious risk of a breakdown in communication and misinformation within a patient’s care pathway. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Illegible clinical records

Wider context from the report

“Illegible clinical records and/or a failure to complete important documents creates a serious risk of a breakdown in communication and misinformation within a patient’s care pathway. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake monthly live spot audits of 30 inpatient records to improve written record quality and communication.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the meantime we will continue to endeavour to improve written records and communication by undertaking monthly ‘live’ spot audits, of 30 records per audit, relating to inpatients on our wards.”

Source location

2016-0186-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 13 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete the rollout of the TrakCare electronic patient record system to consolidate patient information and prevent incomplete or illegible records.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is currently in the process of installing an electronic patient record system (EPR); this is a computerised version of the entire healthcare record. Instead of hospital staff using a mixture of paper and electronic records, information will be available to them online in one place. We already use a variety of electronic systems to help staff look after our patients but the EPR will bring all this information about our patients together into one system for better and safer care.”

Source location

2016-0186-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 13 May 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026