PFD report

Angela Jean Kearn · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Mar 2023•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to provide sufficiently prominent warnings about full-face mask risks to affected users
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate product safety warnings about serious hazards
  2. Lack of medical-profession awareness and training on Immersion Pulmonary Oedema
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and control immersion pulmonary oedema risks in diving
  3. Failure of mask safety testing to replicate general-public use conditions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.5

  1. Position

    The Office for Product Safety and Standards holds responsibility for product recalls and consumer product safety matters.

    Stated by National Trading StandardsRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide sufficiently prominent warnings about full-face mask risks to affected users

Wider context from the report

“ix.) Decathlon have recently updated their website in the United Kingdom to include the following, “It is not recommended to use this product if you have any ongoing respiratory or cardiovascular issues including but not limited to chest infection, asthma, high/raised blood pressure (hypertension), heart disease or angina etc. If you have any doubts or questions relating to this please check with your medical practitioner.” The same additional wording is being translated and added to all websites of the company. x.) The packaging of the mask has been revised to show a pictogram to warn against use of the mask by those with heart or other cardiovascular conditions. xi.) The concern is that many million of the full face masks have been sold and the safety concerns about their use by those with ongoing cardiovascular and respiratory issues has not been widely publicised or brought to the attention of those who already own the masks. Those purchased before 2017 had no warning in relation to these matters and the warning included in the instructions from 2017 inwards was not prominent nor sufficient to alert prospective purchasers to the hazards of use which have now been identified. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate product safety warnings about serious hazards.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of medical-profession awareness and training on Immersion Pulmonary Oedema

Wider context from the report

“Awareness of Immersion Pulmonary Oedema in the medical profession: i.) Concerns were raised by the medical witnesses that there is very little awareness of Immersion Pulmonary Oedema in the medical profession and that it is not addressed in medical training, as a consequence, it can be missed by those treating the condition and is often mistaken for drowning. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and control immersion pulmonary oedema risks in diving.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of mask safety testing to replicate general-public use conditions

Wider context from the report

“The Full Face Mask ii.) At the time that the Easybreath full face snorkel mask was developed by Decathlon there were no United Kingdom or European Standards which were applicable to a full face snorkelling mask. iii.) In the course of its development, Decathlon commissioned a number of tests to be undertaken on it, but it was accepted in evidence that the tests undertaken did not replicate the conditions of the use of the mask by the general public. iv.) Decathlon have sold over 16 million of the masks. Other such masks are also on the market. v.) The Decathlon usage instructions for the full face mask, contained in small print, have been amended over time. From the 17th August 2015 the instructions included a warning that you must make sure that you are in good physical condition before snorkelling and that the mask is not suitable for swimming. vi.) Further tests were undertaken and an Ergomedical report considered the issue of whether use of the mask and inhalation through the mask’s dead space gave rise to excess carbon dioxide inhalation. The report concluded “we strongly recommend to advise against wearing Easybreath masks to people who suffer from underlying cardio-respiratory conditions.” vii.) As a result, Decathlon amended their instructions for use to include that the mask should not be used if the user has unstable cardio-respiratory pathologies, that the mask is to be used under conditions of submaximal exercise (mild to moderate) and that it is not suitable for active swimming. viii.) Development of a United Kingdom standard in relation to this type of mask is now being put in train but has not yet begun and is likely to take some time. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of applicable standards for full-face snorkelling masks

Wider context from the report

“The Full Face Mask ii.) At the time that the Easybreath full face snorkel mask was developed by Decathlon there were no United Kingdom or European Standards which were applicable to a full face snorkelling mask. iii.) In the course of its development, Decathlon commissioned a number of tests to be undertaken on it, but it was accepted in evidence that the tests undertaken did not replicate the conditions of the use of the mask by the general public. iv.) Decathlon have sold over 16 million of the masks. Other such masks are also on the market. v.) The Decathlon usage instructions for the full face mask, contained in small print, have been amended over time. From the 17th August 2015 the instructions included a warning that you must make sure that you are in good physical condition before snorkelling and that the mask is not suitable for swimming. vi.) Further tests were undertaken and an Ergomedical report considered the issue of whether use of the mask and inhalation through the mask’s dead space gave rise to excess carbon dioxide inhalation. The report concluded “we strongly recommend to advise against wearing Easybreath masks to people who suffer from underlying cardio-respiratory conditions.” vii.) As a result, Decathlon amended their instructions for use to include that the mask should not be used if the user has unstable cardio-respiratory pathologies, that the mask is to be used under conditions of submaximal exercise (mild to moderate) and that it is not suitable for active swimming. viii.) Development of a United Kingdom standard in relation to this type of mask is now being put in train but has not yet begun and is likely to take some time. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Office for Product Safety and Standards holds responsibility for product recalls and consumer product safety matters.

Verbatim wording from the response

“National Trading Standards (NTS) is not able to act on the issues raised in this report. NTS is a grant giving body that utilises Government grants to commission specified elements of Trading Standards related work from local authorities. Product safety does not fall within the scope of NTS. We do not receive any grants to commission work in this area. Issues surrounding product recalls and the Government lead for the safety of consumer products lies with the Office for Product Safety and Standards (part of the Department for Business and Trade). They work with local authorities on product recalls and we would recommend that, if it has not already been sent to them, that this report is sent to the Chief Executive of OPSS to respond.”

Source location

Response from National Trading Standards
Page 1 · response
Published 31 March 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Product safety falls outside the organisation’s functions and grant-funded scope, so it cannot act on the reported issues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“National Trading Standards (NTS) is not able to act on the issues raised in this report. NTS is a grant giving body that utilises Government grants to commission specified elements of Trading Standards related work from local authorities. Product safety does not fall within the scope of NTS. We do not receive any grants to commission work in this area. Issues surrounding product recalls and the Government lead for the safety of consumer products lies with the Office for Product Safety and Standards (part of the Department for Business and Trade). They work with local authorities on product recalls and we would recommend that, if it has not already been sent to them, that this report is sent to the Chief Executive of OPSS to respond.”

Source location

Response from National Trading Standards
Page 1 · response
Published 31 March 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The level of training and medical education in Egypt is outside the respondent's jurisdiction, so it cannot comment on it.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I note that this case happened in Egypt. We are not able to comment on the level of training or the medical education system in Egypt as that country is outside our jurisdiction.”

Source location

Response from General Medical Council
Page 2 · response
Published 31 March 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No further specific education or training intervention is required because Immersion Pulmonary Oedema is rare and its presentation and immediate management resemble other emergencies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst it is not the role of the GMC to comment on specific clinical practice, Immersion Pulmonary Oedema is a rare condition and its emergency presentation may be similar to other medical emergencies. Its immediate management will also be similar and therefore we feel at this stage no further specific education and training intervention would be required. Institutions such as the Medical Royal Colleges may be able to provide you with information related to the details for a process to identify and develop areas where learning is needed and can be shared in postgraduate training across the relevant specialties and subspecialties.”

Source location

Response from General Medical Council
Page 1 · response
Published 31 March 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing medical education and training equip UK doctors to assess and manage rare acute conditions, including Immersion Pulmonary Oedema.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Through our standards and quality assurance of medical education and training we ensure that doctors in the UK are equipped with professional behaviours, knowledge, and skills to competently assess complex and uncertain acute and emergency situations. In addition, through professional clinical reasoning doctors are able to consider relevant differential diagnoses and manage acute medical emergencies including identifying people at high risk due to underlying comorbidities (such as Angela’s age and her history with hypertension).”

Source location

Response from General Medical Council
Page 1 · response
Published 31 March 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Update and publish graduate medical education outcomes to support safe practice.

    Stated by Recipient name withheldStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 31 March 2023.
  2. 2

    Work with healthcare-sector partners to improve regulated professionals’ training in the UK.

    Stated by Recipient name withheldStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 31 March 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update and publish graduate medical education outcomes to support safe practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our powers don’t extend to mandating specific content in undergraduate curricula, but we determine and publish the high-level outcomes all medical students are required to demonstrate in order to graduate and be awarded a Primary Medical Qualification (PMQ). We updated our Outcomes for graduates in 2018 after extensive consultation. This is supplemented by a set of core Practical skills and procedures graduates must have achieved when they start work for the first time so they can practise safely.”

Source location

Response from General Medical Council
Page 3 · response
Published 31 March 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with healthcare-sector partners to improve regulated professionals’ training in the UK.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The GMC is committed to work with others in the health care sectors to improve training of the professionals we regulate so that doctors are better equipped with dealing with the variety of healthcare concerns and demands within the UK. To provide some context to medical education and training in the UK, I hope the attached annex is helpful to you.”

Source location

Response from General Medical Council
Page 2 · response
Published 31 March 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026