PFD report

Mary WANYA · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Apr 2014•West Yorkshire (East)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure of investigation reports to address relevant clinical issues and delays
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigations
  2. Failure to ensure investigation authors have appropriate clinical knowledge, experience and qualifications
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigations
  3. Failure to provide prompt assessment, diagnosis and treatment of mental illness
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable access to specialist mental health treatment for serious mental illnessPart of recurring concern: Unreliable assessment of patients’ mental state
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of investigation reports to address relevant clinical issues and delays

Wider context from the report

“(2) Regarding the Trusts Level 3 Investigation Report prepared by ████████ Head of Health and Safety dated 8th February 2012. I regard this as being an inadequate and unhelpful Report, which only concentrated on the defective windows, which although a relevant issue, this Report did not address the serious issues in respect of Mary Wanya’s misdiagnosis and her inappropriate discharge from Ward 26 on 30th October 2011. The Report did not address the delays in ruling out physical illness outlined herein and the subsequent delays in obtaining psychiatric assessment. I therefore recommend that the Trust should review it’s procedures for the instigation of such Reports and should ensure that the Lead Investigator and the author of such Reports has appropriate knowledge, experience and qualifications to address the relevant issues. It is clear to me that a person from a Health and Safety background, such as ████████, did not have the appropriate knowledge, experience and qualifications to assess medical and clinical issues, which was clearly part of the Root cause of this enquiry ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure investigation authors have appropriate clinical knowledge, experience and qualifications

Wider context from the report

“(2) Regarding the Trusts Level 3 Investigation Report prepared by ████████ Head of Health and Safety dated 8th February 2012. I regard this as being an inadequate and unhelpful Report, which only concentrated on the defective windows, which although a relevant issue, this Report did not address the serious issues in respect of Mary Wanya’s misdiagnosis and her inappropriate discharge from Ward 26 on 30th October 2011. The Report did not address the delays in ruling out physical illness outlined herein and the subsequent delays in obtaining psychiatric assessment. I therefore recommend that the Trust should review it’s procedures for the instigation of such Reports and should ensure that the Lead Investigator and the author of such Reports has appropriate knowledge, experience and qualifications to address the relevant issues. It is clear to me that a person from a Health and Safety background, such as ████████, did not have the appropriate knowledge, experience and qualifications to assess medical and clinical issues, which was clearly part of the Root cause of this enquiry ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide prompt assessment, diagnosis and treatment of mental illness

Wider context from the report

“1. (i) There was a considerable delay of over 60 hours before a psychiatrist attended St James’s University Hospital to assess Mary Wanya. In fact the psychiatrist arrived 5 minutes after her fall had occurred and hence she never received a psychiatric assessment. (ii) The Trust should review the system for obtaining urgent psychiatric assessments, particularly out of hours, with a view to speeding up and providing a more efficient service. (iii) In view of the size and scale of the St James’s University site the Trust should consider having an on site resident psychiatrist to avoid the obvious delay in bringing psychiatrists from St Mary’s Hospital, which is some distance away and will exacerbate delay. (iv) The Trust should consider making arrangements with the Mental Health Trust responsible for the Becklin Centre so that the Becklin Centre staff should be involved with such patients, particularly out of hours, to avoid delay and to provide earlier diagnosis and treatment. Had Mrs Wanya been transferred to the Becklin Centre and been psychiatrically assessed and her treatment had commenced much earlier, it is likely that this death could have been avoided. (v) There is an inferior system for the assessment and treatment of patients on the Medical Admissions Unit of patients suffering from mental illness in comparison with those who are physically ill. The Trust should therefore review this urgently and ensure that the systems are developed to provide for a faster system to rule out physical illness that might cause or contribute to mental disturbance and when this has been achieved to provide a prompt assessment, diagnosis and treatment for such patients in respect of their obvious mental illness. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to specialist mental health treatment for serious mental illness; Unreliable assessment of patients’ mental state.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in obtaining urgent psychiatric assessments

Wider context from the report

“1. (i) There was a considerable delay of over 60 hours before a psychiatrist attended St James’s University Hospital to assess Mary Wanya. In fact the psychiatrist arrived 5 minutes after her fall had occurred and hence she never received a psychiatric assessment. (ii) The Trust should review the system for obtaining urgent psychiatric assessments, particularly out of hours, with a view to speeding up and providing a more efficient service. (iii) In view of the size and scale of the St James’s University site the Trust should consider having an on site resident psychiatrist to avoid the obvious delay in bringing psychiatrists from St Mary’s Hospital, which is some distance away and will exacerbate delay. (iv) The Trust should consider making arrangements with the Mental Health Trust responsible for the Becklin Centre so that the Becklin Centre staff should be involved with such patients, particularly out of hours, to avoid delay and to provide earlier diagnosis and treatment. Had Mrs Wanya been transferred to the Becklin Centre and been psychiatrically assessed and her treatment had commenced much earlier, it is likely that this death could have been avoided. (v) There is an inferior system for the assessment and treatment of patients on the Medical Admissions Unit of patients suffering from mental illness in comparison with those who are physically ill. The Trust should therefore review this urgently and ensure that the systems are developed to provide for a faster system to rule out physical illness that might cause or contribute to mental disturbance and when this has been achieved to provide a prompt assessment, diagnosis and treatment for such patients in respect of their obvious mental illness. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable urgent mental health referral and assessment pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to promptly rule out physical illness contributing to mental disturbance

Wider context from the report

“1. (i) There was a considerable delay of over 60 hours before a psychiatrist attended St James’s University Hospital to assess Mary Wanya. In fact the psychiatrist arrived 5 minutes after her fall had occurred and hence she never received a psychiatric assessment. (ii) The Trust should review the system for obtaining urgent psychiatric assessments, particularly out of hours, with a view to speeding up and providing a more efficient service. (iii) In view of the size and scale of the St James’s University site the Trust should consider having an on site resident psychiatrist to avoid the obvious delay in bringing psychiatrists from St Mary’s Hospital, which is some distance away and will exacerbate delay. (iv) The Trust should consider making arrangements with the Mental Health Trust responsible for the Becklin Centre so that the Becklin Centre staff should be involved with such patients, particularly out of hours, to avoid delay and to provide earlier diagnosis and treatment. Had Mrs Wanya been transferred to the Becklin Centre and been psychiatrically assessed and her treatment had commenced much earlier, it is likely that this death could have been avoided. (v) There is an inferior system for the assessment and treatment of patients on the Medical Admissions Unit of patients suffering from mental illness in comparison with those who are physically ill. The Trust should therefore review this urgently and ensure that the systems are developed to provide for a faster system to rule out physical illness that might cause or contribute to mental disturbance and when this has been achieved to provide a prompt assessment, diagnosis and treatment for such patients in respect of their obvious mental illness. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise physical illness in mental health patients.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.