PFD report

Stephen Peter Jackson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Oct 2018•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to provide timely mental health follow-up after hospital discharge
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after dischargePart of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely continuing mental health reviews and follow-up
  2. Failure to answer calls to mental health professionals
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable telephone access to mental health services
  3. Failure to send mental health appointments
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably send required mental health service communications to service users
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide timely mental health follow-up after hospital discharge

Wider context from the report

“1. On the 1st August 2018 Mr. Jackson attended his GP and expressed frustration that following his discharge from hospital on the 23rd July 2018. He had not been contacted by the home treatment team and his GP wrote to the Kingstanding and Erdington Home Treatment Team that same day asking them to expedite his appointment, reporting that Mr. Jackson continued to have low mood and negative thoughts and merited an urgent appointment. 2. Mr. Jackson was not seen by mental health clinicians following the GP request. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after discharge; Failure to provide timely continuing mental health reviews and follow-up.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to answer calls to mental health professionals

Wider context from the report

“3. Mr. Jackson wrote a very detailed suicide note within which he refers to feeling unsupported by professionals who did not send him appointments or answers his calls, the context would support this being a reference to mental health professionals. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable telephone access to mental health services.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to send mental health appointments

Wider context from the report

“3. Mr. Jackson wrote a very detailed suicide note within which he refers to feeling unsupported by professionals who did not send him appointments or answers his calls, the context would support this being a reference to mental health professionals. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably send required mental health service communications to service users.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Under-funding of mental health services

Wider context from the report

“4. Although evidence at inquest has yet to be heard there is a concern that this case, along with several other cases being investigated by the Birmingham and Solihull Coroners’ jurisdiction, future deaths may arise due to under-funding of mental health services. 5. The strain on the systems of mental health services provided by both Forward Thinking Birmingham and Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Trust has become apparent to the Birmingham and Solihull Coroners in recent months. Consequently this report to prevent future death is being made in conjunction with reports to prevent future deaths arising from 6 other investigations into deaths between May and August 2018 that demonstrate a risk that future deaths will occur as a result of under-funding. 6. In addition to this report letters are enclosed from the Medical Directors of both Trusts setting out their concerns. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient mental health service capacity for timely patient care.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026