PFD report

Mr Paul Mclean · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Oct 2019•South Wales Central

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to ask callers how long the patient has been fitting
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable ambulance call triage and re-triagePart of recurring concern: Unreliable seizure care and managementPart of recurring concern: Unsafe emergency call handling
  2. Lack of a pathway for updating prison emergency-call operators about WAST call-prioritisation changes
  3. Failure to consistently categorise non-maintenance of airways as a continuous red code
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable ambulance call triage and re-triagePart of recurring concern: Unsafe emergency call handling
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Implement escalation arrangements for healthcare professional callers requiring urgent clinical discussion, including prioritised clinical review of waiting calls.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 November 2019.
  2. Action

    Assess whether to create bespoke emergency-call pathways for Parc Prison and decide against introducing local variation.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 November 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    A bespoke Parc Prison pathway or local call-handling variation is not considered appropriate because it could adversely affect patients across Wales.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustNo action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ask callers how long the patient has been fitting

Wider context from the report

“1. The adequacy/accuracy of the scripting of questions for seizure/fitting calls. In particular, and in relation to code 12D02 calls (post 19.6.19) the requirement for a healthcare professional to call back after 20 minutes of continuous fitting to trigger a call upgrade from Amber 1 to Red. In an email from ████████ of 17.10.19 @ 07.11 and read to the court, it was confirmed that the question is not currently asked of the caller to WAST, how long has the patient been fitting? This would appear to be a crucial piece of information in order to ascertain as accurately as possible, the known timing of the onset of the fit, for the purposes of determining when the 20minutes has elapsed. E.g. if it is known that the patient has already been fitting for 10 minutes, then the advice to call back should be in 10 minutes hence. If the fit has just commenced, then obviously, that advice can be for a 20 minute call back. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable ambulance call triage and re-triage; Unreliable seizure care and management; Unsafe emergency call handling.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a pathway for updating prison emergency-call operators about WAST call-prioritisation changes

Wider context from the report

“3. Whether a pathway exists, or should be created for updating G4S – the operators of Parcison with changes implemented by the WAST affecting call prioritisation. This is likely to have the benefit of ensuring that healthcare professionals at the prison are fully aware of what is expected of them in an emergency call to WAST and what response can be expected from WAST at the time an emergency call is placed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consistently categorise non-maintenance of airways as a continuous red code

Wider context from the report

“2. The wider issue of whether a response from a healthcare professional (to a question(s) posed by a call handler) that the patient is not maintaining his/her airways should in itself trigger/categorise a continuous red code. The evidence of ████████ at the Inquest, was that such a scenario was of the highest clinical priority, as the patient had a high risk of cardiac arrest in such circumstances. There appeared some tension in the evidence surrounding the 12D01/02/03 categorisation as to which code would be triggered on the volunteering, or otherwise of this indication from the caller. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable ambulance call triage and re-triage; Unsafe emergency call handling.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a clear clinical dialogue pathway for appropriate emergency-call categorisation

Wider context from the report

“4. Whether there is, or should exist, a clear pathway for dialogue between the Princess of Wales Hospital Emergency Department clinicians and WAST in relation to best practice for call categorisation. In particular, whether there should be regular input from the emergency department consultants at the Princess of Wales Hospital into the CPAS group for the purposes of assisting in relation to the appropriate categorisation of calls. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement escalation arrangements for healthcare professional callers requiring urgent clinical discussion, including prioritised clinical review of waiting calls.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The actions to be taken when the urgency of the response after triage does not match the expectations of the booking HCP due to the presenting condition include:”

Source location

2019-0347-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 17 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess whether to create bespoke emergency-call pathways for Parc Prison and decide against introducing local variation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Whether a pathway exists, or should be created for updating G4S – the operators of Parc Prison with changes implemented by the WAST affecting call prioritisation. This is likely to have the benefit of ensuring that healthcare professionals at the prison are fully aware of what is expected of them in an emergency call to WAST and what response can be expected from WAST at the time an emergency call is placed.”

Source location

2019-0347-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 17 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A bespoke Parc Prison pathway or local call-handling variation is not considered appropriate because it could adversely affect patients across Wales.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As an All Wales Ambulance Trust we provide an all Wales service. The Trust operates three regional CCC’s who work virtually across Wales, not servicing individual Health Boards or boundaries, with calls being answered by the availability of call handlers, rather than by geographical location of the patient. Therefore, the handling of emergency calls received, is pan Wales, without regional and or local variations. This principle is also true across all of the HM Prisons across Wales.”

Source location

2019-0347-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 17 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The existing pan-Wales CPAS governance framework and international MPDS system are considered sufficient for best-practice call categorisation without a separate hospital pathway.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. Whether there is, or should exist, a clear pathway for dialogue between the Princess of Wales Hospital Emergency Department clinicians and WAST in relation to best practice for call categorisation. In particular, whether there should be regular input from the emergency department consultants at the Princess of Wales Hospital into the CPAS group for the purposes of assisting in relation to the appropriate categorisation of calls.”

Source location

2019-0347-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services-NHS-Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 17 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing MPDS triage, clinical support and escalation arrangements are considered sufficient to prioritise healthcare professional calls appropriately.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To overcome this, the Trust now use the questions through the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS), to ensure that all patients across Wales are treated with parity, including HCP requests. HCP calls are consequently prioritised as Red where it is clinically appropriate.”

Source location

2019-0347-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 17 November 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Revise prolonged-fitting guidance to keep call takers on the line and escalate calls to Red for immediate dispatch.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 November 2019.
  2. 2

    Establish a Clinical Support Desk staffed by dedicated clinicians to enable clinician-to-clinician escalation for healthcare professional callers.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 November 2019.
  3. 3

    Increase Clinical Support Desk clinician capacity and introduce a call-taker supervisor and clinical shift-lead role.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 November 2019.
  4. 4

    Consider moving code 12C02 to the Red category and discuss the change through the clinical prioritisation group.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 November 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise prolonged-fitting guidance to keep call takers on the line and escalate calls to Red for immediate dispatch.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the Trust has also changed the guidance for prolonged fitting. This guidance reflects that the call taker should stay on the line with all callers, rather than asking Health Care Professional (HCP) callers to ring back (I attach a copy of the current guidance for your reference) and calls should be escalated to a Red, in order to ensure the immediate dispatch of a suitable resource.”

Source location

2019-0347-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 17 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a Clinical Support Desk staffed by dedicated clinicians to enable clinician-to-clinician escalation for healthcare professional callers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There are rare occasions, as a result of this change, when the MPDS will not detect the urgency of some, relatively rare, asymptomatic conditions. However, to overcome this the Trust has introduced within the Clinical Contact Centre”

Source location

2019-0347-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 17 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase Clinical Support Desk clinician capacity and introduce a call-taker supervisor and clinical shift-lead role.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, I can provide you with assurance that quality improvements and changes have been made within the Trust. I can confirm that we have improved the way in which the Trust and HCP callers are able to communicate. The Trust has increased the number of clinicians on the CSD. Further to this the Trust has introduced 2 new roles within the CCC and the CSD. The first role being a Call Taker Supervisor is a new role introduced in November 2018, with the purpose of supporting the CCC operating 24 hours a day 7 days per week. The second role is a shift lead within the CSD who will have oversight of the patients waiting on the 999 queue. This clinician can now view a list or queue of calls”

Source location

2019-0347-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 17 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider moving code 12C02 to the Red category and discuss the change through the clinical prioritisation group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The improvement plan attached includes actions that the Trust is considering in relation to the code set 12C02. One of the actions will be to consider whether the Trust will move the code set into the Red (Immediately Life Threatening) category. This has already been previously been discussed and considered through the Clinical Prioritisation Assessment Software (CPAS) group, and is scheduled for further discussion in March 2020.”

Source location

2019-0347-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 17 November 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026