PFD report

Philip Richard Hayes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Oct 2019•Newcastle upon Tyne

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Inconsistency in approach and answers to algorithm questions indicating risk of aortic aneurysm, rupture or dissection
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond to suspected aortic dissection
  2. Triage of calls by health advisors with limited medical training and no medical qualifications
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure NHS 111 health advisors are competent for safe clinical triage
  3. Inconsistency in referral for clinical input
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inconsistency in approach and answers to algorithm questions indicating risk of aortic aneurysm, rupture or dissection

Wider context from the report

“(3) Inconsistency in approach and answers to algorithm question designed to indicate risk of aortic aneurysm/rupture/dissection ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond to suspected aortic dissection.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Triage of calls by health advisors with limited medical training and no medical qualifications

Wider context from the report

“(4) Calls triaged by health advisors with limited medical training and no medical qualifications ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure NHS 111 health advisors are competent for safe clinical triage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inconsistency in referral for clinical input

Wider context from the report

“(5) Inconsistency in approach to referral for clinical input ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delay in ambulance dispatch

Wider context from the report

“(1) Delay in ambulance dispatch Call categorised C2 received response 1 hour 2 minutes after original call ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in ambulance attendance; Unreliable ambulance dispatch and resource-allocation controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient triage by algorithm when inadequate weight is given to reported symptoms and indicators of a medical emergency

Wider context from the report

“(6) Appropriateness of triage by algorithm. Insufficient if any weight given to actual reported symptoms and indicators of a medical emergency ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable algorithmic triage of unwell patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to conduct reassessment of C2 category

Wider context from the report

“(2) Failure to conduct reassessment of C2 category notwithstanding 5 subsequent calls describing additional symptoms and a deteriorating condition ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.