PFD report

Shaun Carter · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Aug 2017•Gloucestershire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Failure to audit compliance with dumper truck safety procedures
  2. Failure to ensure dumper truck safety procedures are accessible to all relevant personnel
  3. Failure to follow dumper truck safety procedures
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Participate in the cross-industry working group taking forward safety improvements for forward-tipping dumpers and spoil heaps.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 1 October 2017.
  2. Action

    Publicise industry safety changes through the e-news bulletin and provide website links to relevant dumper and spoil-heap guidance.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 October 2017.
  3. Action

    Participate in manufacturers’ work assessing feasible and desirable forward-tipping dumper design improvements, including cab and restraint-related measures.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 October 2017.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to audit compliance with dumper truck safety procedures

Wider context from the report

“1. At the inquest there was evidence that the risks associated with the use of dumper trucks was recognised and that risk assessments and method statements were written which reflected these risks. However the safety procedures were not followed, not seen by all relevant personnel (some of whom could not read) and the practice in this regard was not audited. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure dumper truck safety procedures are accessible to all relevant personnel

Wider context from the report

“1. At the inquest there was evidence that the risks associated with the use of dumper trucks was recognised and that risk assessments and method statements were written which reflected these risks. However the safety procedures were not followed, not seen by all relevant personnel (some of whom could not read) and the practice in this regard was not audited. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to follow dumper truck safety procedures

Wider context from the report

“1. At the inquest there was evidence that the risks associated with the use of dumper trucks was recognised and that risk assessments and method statements were written which reflected these risks. However the safety procedures were not followed, not seen by all relevant personnel (some of whom could not read) and the practice in this regard was not audited. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Dumper truck drivers jumping from trucks during incidents

Wider context from the report

“3. Dumper trucks are designed to ensure that drivers are protected, even if the dumper trucks topple over. However the inherent open nature of trucks can nonetheless make the driver feeling vulnerable and despite the instructions which require the driver to remain seated during an incident, statistics indicate (as in this case) that the natural reaction of drivers is to jump from the truck. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a process for safely managing spoil heaps

Wider context from the report

“2. At the inquest it was confirmed that there was no process in place to ensure that spoil heaps were managed safely, nor any guidelines issued by the HSE in this regard. This has been addressed by Tonic Construction in relation to the site its manages, but there are still no industry standards relating to the management of spoil heaps. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to control safety risks in spoil-heap management and removal operations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of industry standards for managing spoil heaps

Wider context from the report

“2. At the inquest it was confirmed that there was no process in place to ensure that spoil heaps were managed safely, nor any guidelines issued by the HSE in this regard. This has been addressed by Tonic Construction in relation to the site its manages, but there are still no industry standards relating to the management of spoil heaps. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to control safety risks in spoil-heap management and removal operations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Participate in the cross-industry working group taking forward safety improvements for forward-tipping dumpers and spoil heaps.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There were several fatal accidents involving forward tipping dumpers during 2016 and HSE was instrumental in helping the construction industry (including Tonic Construction) set up a working group to take forward safety improvements connected with the design and use of dumper trucks and the design of spoil heaps. I attend that group on behalf of HSE. The group is co-chaired by the Construction Plant-hire Association and Civil Engineering Contractors Association. The group comprises construction contractors, hire companies, owners of forward tipping dumpers, manufacturers, client organisations and industry federations as well as HSE.”

Source location

2017-0245-Response-by-HSE
Page 1 · response
Published 1 October 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publicise industry safety changes through the e-news bulletin and provide website links to relevant dumper and spoil-heap guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The actions from that group include promoting an emphasis on training, not just of operators but also of supervisors and those who design construction sites so they understand the safety issues raised by the construction of spoil heaps and can where possible reduce or eliminate the use of them and otherwise tightly control the use of them. HSE will publicise the changes via its e-news bulletin which is well subscribed to within the construction industry, and provide links to the industry pages on our website. Other specific actions the group is taking are included below.”

Source location

2017-0245-Response-by-HSE
Page 1 · response
Published 1 October 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Participate in manufacturers’ work assessing feasible and desirable forward-tipping dumper design improvements, including cab and restraint-related measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A manufacturers’ sub-group of the working group has been considering potential dumper truck design improvements identified by the users/hire companies/clients. These result from a survey of Civil Engineers Contractors Association members which suggested improvements that are most important or critical to safety. The manufacturers will be meeting again, under the leadership of the Construction Equipment Association, to work through specific improvements that can be made. HSE will also be involved. Examining the feasibility / desirability of the fitting of cab as standard will take some time. There is currently no standard or test criteria for determining the design of any cab and the level of impact it should take. Design changes need to be considered carefully and done correctly so that they do not introduce other unforeseen hazards.”

Source location

2017-0245-Response-by-HSE
Page 2 · response
Published 1 October 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Comment on the updated guidance for safe use of forward-tipping dumpers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Construction Plant-hire Association (CPA) is producing updated guidance on the safe use of forward tipping dumpers. HSE has been involved in commenting on this. This work is nearing completion and the guidance will be available free to download from the CPA website. The guidance will include information for operators that should improve awareness and knowledge by including detail explaining why issues are important rather than just saying something should be done; guidance to managers and designers for planning and supervision of forward tipping dumpers on sites; and a case study annex using a real example. HSE will provide a link from its website to this guidance.”

Source location

2017-0245-Response-by-HSE
Page 2 · response
Published 1 October 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and revise HSG144 guidance, including advice and signposting on forward-tipping dumper safety.

Verbatim wording from the response

“HSE has started a review and revision of its HSG144 guidance on safe use of vehicles on construction sites. We are considering what specific advice we can provide to help improve safety in the use of forward tipping dumper trucks and include signposting to other guidance published by CPA and CECA. This should be completed next year.”

Source location

2017-0245-Response-by-HSE
Page 2 · response
Published 1 October 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assist with adding advice on unconsolidated spoil heaps to industry guidance produced under the Strategic Forum for Plant Safety Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Strategic Forum for Plant Safety Group (SFPSG) is to produce good practice guidance on forward tipping dumpers. I also attend this group on behalf of HSE. This guidance will be available to download free of charge and will be hosted on the CPA website (CPA chair that group). I will also be assisting CPA with an addition to its guidance on ground conditions to include advice on unconsolidated spoil heaps, and this will again be under the auspices of the SFPSG. This guidance will also be available to download free of charge from the CPA website.”

Source location

2017-0245-Response-by-HSE
Page 2 · response
Published 1 October 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026