PFD report

Barbara Patterson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 21 May 2015•Northumberland (North)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Delays in ambulance crew handover at hospitals reducing ambulance availability
    Part of recurring concern: Delays in ambulance-to-hospital patient handover
  2. Failure of the Pathways system to prompt CPR advice for patients with agonal breathing
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to recognise agonal breathing
  3. Failure by call handlers to give timely CPR advice
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Meet with NEAS in September 2015 to discuss staffing levels, vacant posts, recruitment, and service-delivery management.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 May 2015.
  2. Action

    Meet with NEAS in September 2015 to discuss patient handover management and collaboration with providers and stakeholders.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 May 2015.
  3. Action

    Require NEAS to provide evidence of how it is mitigating risks in the Pathways system and working with the Pathways programme to improve it.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 May 2015.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    NHS Pathways disputes that the system is faulty, stating it already identifies noisy breathing as requiring CPR advice.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in ambulance crew handover at hospitals reducing ambulance availability

Wider context from the report

“6. During the inquest evidence was given that ambulance availability is being jeopardised by crews being delayed at hospital when handing patients over to Accident and Emergency staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in ambulance-to-hospital patient handover.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the Pathways system to prompt CPR advice for patients with agonal breathing

Wider context from the report

“2. During the inquest evidence was given that the Pathways system, a computerised system piloted in the North East and since rolled out for use by 6 other Healthcare Trusts nationally, has a fault in that it does not advise non clinical call handlers to issue CPR advice unless a patient has stopped breathing. This fails to recognise the need for CPR in cases of Agonal (heavy/noisy breathing which is insufficient to sustain life). This fault was pointed out to Pathways by the Clinical Section Manager for North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, prior to the latest update being installed in early 2014 (Update 9). Pathways refused to amend the system. That fault remains in place to date. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise agonal breathing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure by call handlers to give timely CPR advice

Wider context from the report

“1. The failure by the Call Handler to give timely advice in respect of CPR. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in ambulance arrival beyond the target response time

Wider context from the report

“4. The target time for the arrival of the ambulance was 8 minutes, this was breached. The ambulance did not arrive for 15 minutes. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in ambulance attendance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure by ambulance dispatchers to dispatch the closest available ambulance

Wider context from the report

“3. The failure by the ambulance dispatcher to dispatch an ambulance closer to the deceased’s location ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable ambulance dispatch and resource-allocation controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Shortage of paramedics

Wider context from the report

“5. During the inquest evidence was given that there is a national shortage of paramedics, which is particularly acute in the North East. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Meet with NEAS in September 2015 to discuss staffing levels, vacant posts, recruitment, and service-delivery management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will be meeting with NEAS in September 2015 to discuss and monitor how they are managing their delivery of the service, what is their current position of staffing levels and identified vacant posts and their current recruitment position.”

Source location

2015-0198-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
Page 3 · response
Published 21 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Meet with NEAS in September 2015 to discuss patient handover management and collaboration with providers and stakeholders.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will be meeting with NEAS in September 2015 to discuss how they are managing the handover process to A & E services and how they are working collaboratively with all providers and stakeholders to ensure a smooth and timely handover process. In addition, this issue will be reviewed as part of our planned full comprehensive inspection of North East Ambulance Service (NEAS).”

Source location

2015-0198-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
Page 3 · response
Published 21 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require NEAS to provide evidence of how it is mitigating risks in the Pathways system and working with the Pathways programme to improve it.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As recognised in your report, the Pathways system is a National Programme, piloted in the North East, which has been introduced in other areas of the country. We have written to NEAS to instruct them to submit evidence of how they are mitigating the risk within the Pathways system and also how they are working with Pathways to improve the system.”

Source location

2015-0198-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 21 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a comprehensive NEAS inspection covering call-handler support, ambulance dispatch, arrival-time breaches, and patient handover procedures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The CQC intend to carry out a planned comprehensive inspection of North East Ambulance Service (NEAS) as part of its ongoing inspection process. During this inspection we will investigate to what extent and degree call handlers are supported by systems and procedures already in place. We will also require NEAS to furnish oral and written evidence to demonstrate that they understand their role and responsibilities in relation to call handlers and that they provide regular monitoring to ensure that the system is functioning at an appropriate level.”

Source location

2015-0198-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 21 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require NEAS to provide evidence on ambulance arrival-time breaches and measures to mitigate or reduce missed targets.

Verbatim wording from the response

“of ambulances is appropriate and what, if any, improvements can be made to the current system. We have written to NEAS to instruct them to submit evidence of their current position around breaches of arrival times of their ambulances together with providing evidence of how they are mitigating the risk of or reducing the missed target times of ambulance arrivals.”

Source location

2015-0198-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
Page 3 · response
Published 21 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Meet with NEAS in September 2015 to discuss management of ambulance dispatch processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This issue will be included as part of our planned comprehensive inspection and investigated to ascertain whether procedures presently in place by NEAS relating to the dispatch of ambulances is appropriate and what, if any, improvements can be made to the current system. Additionally, we will be meeting with NEAS in September 2015 to discuss how they are managing the process of dispatching ambulances.”

Source location

2015-0198-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 21 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS Pathways disputes that the system is faulty, stating it already identifies noisy breathing as requiring CPR advice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS Pathways has provided a response to your concerns (attached) which includes an overview of the CDSS system, how it is implemented, reviewed and updated and the amendments that are made to supporting information on breathing assessment. Noisy breathing is already identified as a major airway compromise that requires an emergency response and appropriate CPR advice. NHS Pathways believes the call-handler might have failed to pick up the cues which should have led to this advice being given.”

Source location

2015-0198-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 2 · response
Published 21 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The eight-minute ambulance response target does not require every life-threatening call to receive a response within eight minutes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The target for an emergency ambulance response is that 75% of all Red 1 calls – the most serious, life-threatening category – receive a response within eight minutes. While ambulance services will always attempt to provide a response as soon as possible in life-threatening situations, the target recognises that it is unfortunately not always physically possible for ambulance services to respond to all Red 1 calls within eight minutes.”

Source location

2015-0198-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 2 · response
Published 21 May 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Monitor NEAS implementation of its regulatory action plan through regular meetings.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 May 2015.
  2. 2

    Extend paramedic training to improve assessment, prescribing and management of patients with chronic illnesses.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 May 2015.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor NEAS implementation of its regulatory action plan through regular meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following submission of the final report we instructed NEAS to submit an action plan. The Action Plan was duly presented to CQC by NEAS within the required timescale and, recognising that the Service required a reasonable period of time to implement the proposed measures, regular meetings were scheduled and conducted between CQC and NEAS, to monitor the progress of their implementation. This process was undergoing at the time of Mrs Patterson’s death.”

Source location

2015-0198-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 21 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Extend paramedic training to improve assessment, prescribing and management of patients with chronic illnesses.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are extending paramedic training to enable them to better assess, prescribe for and manage patients with chronic illnesses. They need to work more closely with GPs and community teams. In support of this, NHS England plans to publish guidance to help ambulance services develop these new ways of working.”

Source location

2015-0198-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 21 May 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026