PFD report

Miss Abiola Dosunmu · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 May 2014•Inner South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Failure to communicate significant proteinuria to the ward
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff
  2. Failure to diagnose a connective tissue disorder in the presence of exceptionally high ESR, elevated CK and proteinuria
  3. Failure to communicate the significance of persistently raised ESR and CK to the patient and family
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to communicate safety-critical care information effectively between care providers and families
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Produce discharge notifications for patients who self-discharge.

    Stated by The TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 May 2014.
  2. Action

    Notify consultants within 12 hours when their patient self-discharges from hospital.

    Stated by The TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 May 2014.
  3. Action

    Refer the case for inclusion in formal Foundation doctor teaching on the significance of marked proteinuria.

    Stated by The TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 May 2014.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    The Trust states that the GP was informed by telephone and received a discharge summary containing the abnormal results.

    Stated by The TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate significant proteinuria to the ward

Wider context from the report

“(1) The 3+ proteinuria discovered in A&E was not communicated to the ward. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to diagnose a connective tissue disorder in the presence of exceptionally high ESR, elevated CK and proteinuria

Wider context from the report

“(4) Despite the exceptionally high ESR, elevated CK of which no cause was found and proteinuria, a diagnosis of cellulitis was preferred to that of a connective tissue disorder. The opportunity to treat her SLE was missed due to failure to diagnose the condition, whilst recognizing that diagnosis was hampered by her self discharge. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate the significance of persistently raised ESR and CK to the patient and family

Wider context from the report

“(2) The Trust failed to communicate the significance of the persistently raised ESR and CK to the patient and family. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to communicate safety-critical care information effectively between care providers and families.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate discharge information and monitoring needs to primary care

Wider context from the report

“(3) The Trust failed to send the GP a discharge summary or communicate to the surgery the significance of the raised ESR and CK and the need for further monitoring. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of hospital discharge-summary processes to provide accurate, complete and timely information to GPs; Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to inform the consultant of the patient and imminent self-discharge before discharge

Wider context from the report

“(5) Before discharge neither the patient nor the imminent self discharge were not known to the consultant, who would have wished to be informed and would have sought further investigations and communications. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior clinicians; Failure to reliably notify responsible consultants about admissions and significant clinical changes; Unsafe self-discharge decision-making.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the Serious Untoward Incident Investigation to consider concerns about clinical communication and consultant notification

Wider context from the report

“(6) Concerns (2) (3) and (5) above were not considered by the Serious Untoward Incident Investigation by the Trust. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations; Unreliable formal safety-incident management processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Produce discharge notifications for patients who self-discharge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“a) Failure to send a discharge summary: A discharge summary should have been completed when Abiola self-discharged. As a result of this case, the Trust conducted an audit which showed that it is not consistent practice to issue discharge summaries for self-discharging patients. This issue was”

Source location

2014-0209-Response-by-Kings-College-Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 5 May 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Notify consultants within 12 hours when their patient self-discharges from hospital.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The medical records (in particular the clinical noted dated 09.03.12 at 13.25 hours) suggest that the Trust communicated the significance of Abiola’s illness as it was understood at the time and did its best to dissuade her from leaving hospital. The Trust is satisfied that it acted appropriately by warning Abiola and her mother of the serious consequences of self-discharging. Nonetheless, with immediate effect consultants will be notified within 12 hours that their patient has discharged themselves from hospital to minimise the potential risk to the patient or others (see also paragraph 5 below).”

Source location

2014-0209-Response-by-Kings-College-Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 5 May 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Refer the case for inclusion in formal Foundation doctor teaching on the significance of marked proteinuria.

Verbatim wording from the response

“a) Training issue: Whilst it is not uncommon to have a trace/+ proteinuria on a urinalysis in a patient with a systemic infection, 3+ proteinuria on a urine dipstick should be recognised as abnormal and needing further investigation. In this case, the result was transcribed to the paper version of the medical admission proforma but not relayed to the inpatient team or noticed by them. The doctors involved in relaying this information no longer work at the Trust, but the Trust will refer the case to be included, as a reminder of the significance of this finding, in the formal teaching of Foundation doctors. The incident has already been shared at departmental governance meetings.”

Source location

2014-0209-Response-by-Kings-College-Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 5 May 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise the emergency department transfer checklist to include results of tests performed before admission.

Verbatim wording from the response

“b) Electronic records: The Trust supports the initiative from the Emergency Department (ED) to introduce point of care testing (POCT) to allow a faster turnaround of results and also an electronic transfer of results from ED to the ward. POCT has been planned for some time and subject to issues around assurance of the results and the IT interface, this should be in place by December 2014. In the interim, and in response to this incident, ED has revised the transfer checklist for patients being admitted to include results of tests done in ED. The checklist is appended to this report.”

Source location

2014-0209-Response-by-Kings-College-Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 5 May 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the incident at departmental governance meetings to reinforce recognition and communication of significant proteinuria.

Verbatim wording from the response

“a) Training issue: Whilst it is not uncommon to have a trace/+ proteinuria on a urinalysis in a patient with a systemic infection, 3+ proteinuria on a urine dipstick should be recognised as abnormal and needing further investigation. In this case, the result was transcribed to the paper version of the medical admission proforma but not relayed to the inpatient team or noticed by them. The doctors involved in relaying this information no longer work at the Trust, but the Trust will refer the case to be included, as a reminder of the significance of this finding, in the formal teaching of Foundation doctors. The incident has already been shared at departmental governance meetings.”

Source location

2014-0209-Response-by-Kings-College-Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 5 May 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust states that the GP was informed by telephone and received a discharge summary containing the abnormal results.

Verbatim wording from the response

“b) Failure to communicate the significance of the raised ESR and CK and need for further monitoring to Abiola’s GP: The Trust contacted the GP by telephone informing the GP that Abiola had self-discharged, recommending oral antibiotics and stressing the importance of IV antibiotics and need for her to attend ED if her condition deteriorated. The Trust also notes that ED generated, and the GP received, a 4 page discharge summary which included (because it was generated on 9 March 2013) the abnormal results identified during Abiola’s admission.”

Source location

2014-0209-Response-by-Kings-College-Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 5 May 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust states that cellulitis was a reasonable working diagnosis and that self-discharge hampered diagnosing the connective tissue disorder.

Verbatim wording from the response

“(2) The SI report concluded that a working diagnosis of cellulitis was reasonable. On that basis, your second concern was not considered a concern for the reasons set out above.”

Source location

2014-0209-Response-by-Kings-College-Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 5 May 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust states that it communicated the illness’s significance and appropriately warned the patient and her mother about self-discharge risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The medical records (in particular the clinical noted dated 09.03.12 at 13.25 hours) suggest that the Trust communicated the significance of Abiola’s illness as it was understood at the time and did its best to dissuade her from leaving hospital. The Trust is satisfied that it acted appropriately by warning Abiola and her mother of the serious consequences of self-discharging. Nonetheless, with immediate effect consultants will be notified within 12 hours that their patient has discharged themselves from hospital to minimise the potential risk to the patient or others (see also paragraph 5 below).”

Source location

2014-0209-Response-by-Kings-College-Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 5 May 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026