PFD report

Cecilia EDWARDS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Feb 2021•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
11

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of clear protocols integrating agency district nurses into the organisation
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe reliance on agency staff for clinical staffing
  2. High proportion of district nursing care provided by agency nurses
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe reliance on agency staff for clinical staffing
  3. Failure to make immediate tissue viability referrals for category 3 pressure ulcers
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate district nursing wound carePart of recurring concern: Inadequate management of pressure ulcersPart of recurring concern: Unreliable referrals to tissue viability services
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Revise daily handovers to include temporary staff and a specific pressure-ulcer management item, with regular senior-nurse monitoring.

    Stated by Whittington Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 February 2021.
  2. Action

    Discuss care coordination with the family and caring nurse, agree the plan, and document it in the electronic care plan.

    Stated by Whittington Health NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 February 2021.
  3. Action

    Monitor family care-coordination arrangements through senior-nurse review, case-note audits and caseload reviews.

    Stated by Whittington Health NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 February 2021.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clear protocols integrating agency district nurses into the organisation

Wider context from the report

“2. 60% of the district nurses who visited Cecilia Edwards were agency nurses. This is obviously undesirable in itself, although I recognise that it may be very difficult to address. That notwithstanding, the district nurse team manager giving evidence in court agreed with Ms Edwards’ niece (herself a former district nurse and health visitor, and her auntie’s longstanding advocate) that clear protocols would raise standards, make mistakes less likely and bring the agency staff in as part of the organisation. Ultimately this would improve patient care. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe reliance on agency staff for clinical staffing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

High proportion of district nursing care provided by agency nurses

Wider context from the report

“2. 60% of the district nurses who visited Cecilia Edwards were agency nurses. This is obviously undesirable in itself, although I recognise that it may be very difficult to address. That notwithstanding, the district nurse team manager giving evidence in court agreed with Ms Edwards’ niece (herself a former district nurse and health visitor, and her auntie’s longstanding advocate) that clear protocols would raise standards, make mistakes less likely and bring the agency staff in as part of the organisation. Ultimately this would improve patient care. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe reliance on agency staff for clinical staffing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make immediate tissue viability referrals for category 3 pressure ulcers

Wider context from the report

“1. On 12 February 2020, a district nurse assessed Ms Edwards’ elbow as a category 3 pressure ulcer, which should have prompted an immediate referral to the tissue viability nurse. However, no such referral was made, either by the attending nurse; the district nurses who visited twice a week over the next seven months; the frequent care plan reviewers; or the shift co-ordinator until 22 September 2020. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate district nursing wound care; Inadequate management of pressure ulcers; Unreliable referrals to tissue viability services.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to routinely coordinate district nurse and carer visits

Wider context from the report

“3. The district nurses who visited Cecilia Edwards needed the assistance of the two carers to turn her and attend to all her nursing needs, but sometimes when they visited there were no carers present and so the nursing care given was incomplete. The carers attended at set hours four times a day, and so it seems that the onus was on the nursing team to arrange the twice weekly visits appropriately. Sometimes, individual nurses would ring individual carers to make arrangements, but there was no organisational system to ensure that nurse and carer visits coincided as a matter of routine. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable coordination and scheduling of district nursing visits.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise daily handovers to include temporary staff and a specific pressure-ulcer management item, with regular senior-nurse monitoring.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the daily handover process has been revised to ensure that all teams across the service have allocated time to attend, including temporary staff. Handover also now includes a specific item for pressure ulcer management. The District Nursing Leads (senior nurses) are monitoring handover on a regular basis to ensure the changes are embedded.”

Source location

2021-0049-Response-from-Whittington-Hospital-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 26 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss care coordination with the family and caring nurse, agree the plan, and document it in the electronic care plan.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There are robust arrangements established with local social care agencies and the District Nursing service. However, in this case there was a private carer arrangement, funded and organised by the family. This requires an individualised approach by the service to co-ordinate the care with families to meet specific requirements of the patient. The service has reviewed how it works with families in these circumstances and going forward there will be a discussion with the family and the nurse caring for the patient on this. The plan of care and working together will be agreed with the family and service and will be clearly documented in the electronic patient record care plan.”

Source location

2021-0049-Response-from-Whittington-Hospital-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 26 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor family care-coordination arrangements through senior-nurse review, case-note audits and caseload reviews.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This will be monitored on a regular basis by the senior nurses and included in future case note audits and caseload reviews.”

Source location

2021-0049-Response-from-Whittington-Hospital-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 26 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise and formally ratify Tissue Viability Nursing referral guidance, following staff consultation, with regular compliance audits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whittington Health has reviewed the process for referral to the Tissue Viability Nursing service (TVN) and is formally revising the ‘Referral to TVN guidance’ to ensure timely referrals are made based on clinical need and categorisation, and not purely based on categorisation alone. The new guidance will undertake regular audit practice to monitor compliance. The guidance will be formally ratified in August 2021, following consultation with staff.”

Source location

2021-0049-Response-from-Whittington-Hospital-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 26 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recruit substantive and bank district-nursing staff through local and international recruitment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Work is also ongoing to recruit to the District Nursing service, both for substantive roles and on the Bank, both locally and internationally. The Trust actively works with agency staff who are regular workers to consider joining the organisation as permanent employees and they are offered several flexible options to meet their personal circumstances. Vacancies are monitored through the Trust divisional reporting structure and at the Trust workforce committee.”

Source location

2021-0049-Response-from-Whittington-Hospital-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 26 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with regular agency staff to support their transition into permanent employment through flexible options.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Work is also ongoing to recruit to the District Nursing service, both for substantive roles and on the Bank, both locally and internationally. The Trust actively works with agency staff who are regular workers to consider joining the organisation as permanent employees and they are offered several flexible options to meet their personal circumstances. Vacancies are monitored through the Trust divisional reporting structure and at the Trust workforce committee.”

Source location

2021-0049-Response-from-Whittington-Hospital-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 26 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the referral process for Tissue Viability Nursing referrals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whittington Health has reviewed the process for referral to the Tissue Viability Nursing service (TVN) and is formally revising the ‘Referral to TVN guidance’ to ensure timely referrals are made based on clinical need and categorisation, and not purely based on categorisation alone. The new guidance will undertake regular audit practice to monitor compliance. The guidance will be formally ratified in August 2021, following consultation with staff.”

Source location

2021-0049-Response-from-Whittington-Hospital-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 26 February 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Introduce an eCommunity version that removes clinical-note recording capability.

    Stated by Whittington Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 February 2021.
  2. 2

    Roll out digital patient records and visits-allocation processes to improve continuity and staff allocation.

    Stated by Whittington Health NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 26 February 2021.
  3. 3

    Review arrangements for coordinating care with families using privately funded carers.

    Stated by Whittington Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 February 2021.
  4. 4

    Move clinical patient information to single community electronic-record documentation, including assessments and care plans.

    Stated by Whittington Health NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 February 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce an eCommunity version that removes clinical-note recording capability.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At the time of the incident there were three different places where patient information was documented; the home notes (on paper kept in the home), eCommunity (the service’s nurse visits allocation software) and RiO (the electronic patient record keeping system used by most community services in the Trust.) Since January 2021, a new version of eCommunity has been introduced which removes the capability to record clinical notes. Additionally, the service will be moving toward single documentation of the clinical patient information on the community electronic records from September of this year. Therefore, removing the risk of documenting the same information in multiple places this includes patient assessments and care plans.”

Source location

2021-0049-Response-from-Whittington-Hospital-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 26 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Roll out digital patient records and visits-allocation processes to improve continuity and staff allocation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Through the improvements to the patient documentation there is a key strand of work in relation to improving continuity of care for all patients and ensuring that allocation of staff to patients includes this and that staff recognise the importance of getting to know their patients and families. This roll-out of the digitalisation patient records and visits allocation programme has involved all staff, permanent and temporary.”

Source location

2021-0049-Response-from-Whittington-Hospital-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 26 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review arrangements for coordinating care with families using privately funded carers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There are robust arrangements established with local social care agencies and the District Nursing service. However, in this case there was a private carer arrangement, funded and organised by the family. This requires an individualised approach by the service to co-ordinate the care with families to meet specific requirements of the patient. The service has reviewed how it works with families in these circumstances and going forward there will be a discussion with the family and the nurse caring for the patient on this. The plan of care and working together will be agreed with the family and service and will be clearly documented in the electronic patient record care plan.”

Source location

2021-0049-Response-from-Whittington-Hospital-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 26 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Move clinical patient information to single community electronic-record documentation, including assessments and care plans.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, Whittington District Nursing service is working towards the digitalisation of clinical notes, and the streamlining of documentation to mitigate the risk of key information being missed.”

Source location

2021-0049-Response-from-Whittington-Hospital-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 26 February 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026