PFD report

Edna Elsie Mary Eden · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Nov 2013•Berkshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
10

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised10

  1. Failure to escalate unresolved clinical review access problems to senior staff
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to escalate patient-safety concerns to senior oversightPart of recurring concern: Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior clinicians
  2. Insufficient information in clinical handovers
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical handover processes
  3. Delays in medical review of admitted patients
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely medical review of admitted patients
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Implement electronic Smartphone referral notifications with Specialist Registrar allocation and a one-hour inpatient-team review goal.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 22 February 2014.
  2. Action

    Introduce electronic MSS calculation of EDOD scores in the Emergency Department.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 February 2014.
  3. Action

    Audit compliance with accurate EDOD score calculation and appropriate algorithm use.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 February 2014.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to escalate unresolved clinical review access problems to senior staff

Wider context from the report

“(3) Nursing staff were not able to make contact with Doctors to review Mrs Eden. When this continued, the problem was not escalated to more senior staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to escalate patient-safety concerns to senior oversight; Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior clinicians.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient information in clinical handovers

Wider context from the report

“(4) Clinicians were taking decisions over priority of seeing patients based only on a very vague description of Mrs Eden’s condition. Information at handovers appeared very limited. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinical handover processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in medical review of admitted patients

Wider context from the report

“(6) An elderly patient who was admitted with a covering letter describing recent chest pain was not seen by a Doctor for a total of fourteen and a half hours. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely medical review of admitted patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in medical review of admitted patients

Wider context from the report

“(1) Mrs Eden was admitted having been prescribed antibiotics by her GP. She was not provided with further antibiotic cover pending being seen by a Doctor and that was unduly delayed meaning that she went fourteen and a half hours without her prescribed medication. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely medical review of admitted patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of junior staff to escalate clinical concerns to senior staff

Wider context from the report

“(5) Junior staff on a very busy shift appeared reluctant, or ignorant of the procedures, to escalate concerns to more senior staff to address a significant backlog that had developed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to escalate patient-safety concerns to senior oversight; Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior clinicians.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient frequency of nursing observations for uncleared patients

Wider context from the report

“(2) The nursing observation chart suggested infrequent observations for a patient who had not yet been clerked by a Doctor. The EDD score was wrongly calculated which meant an escalation of Doctor review was not carried out. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable patient observation arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to base patient-review prioritisation on sufficiently detailed clinical information

Wider context from the report

“(4) Clinicians were taking decisions over priority of seeing patients based only on a very vague description of Mrs Eden’s condition. Information at handovers appeared very limited. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable prioritisation of patient reviews.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to calculate EDD scores accurately and trigger required Doctor review

Wider context from the report

“(2) The nursing observation chart suggested infrequent observations for a patient who had not yet been clerked by a Doctor. The EDD score was wrongly calculated which meant an escalation of Doctor review was not carried out. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior clinicians; Unreliable clinical Early Warning Score systems for deterioration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide prescribed antibiotic cover pending medical review

Wider context from the report

“(1) Mrs Eden was admitted having been prescribed antibiotics by her GP. She was not provided with further antibiotic cover pending being seen by a Doctor and that was unduly delayed meaning that she went fourteen and a half hours without her prescribed medication. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of Doctors for nursing requests for review

Wider context from the report

“(3) Nursing staff were not able to make contact with Doctors to review Mrs Eden. When this continued, the problem was not escalated to more senior staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide requested on-call clinical review.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement electronic Smartphone referral notifications with Specialist Registrar allocation and a one-hour inpatient-team review goal.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All referrals to the Hospital pass through the Emergency Department. On 14 January 2014 the Trust introduced a new Procedure for dealing with referrals to the hospital. Although some aspects of this new procedure are underway the electronic section is expected to go live in six weeks’ time. The electronic system will ensure that instead of using the bleep system to notify inpatient teams that there is a patient in the Emergency Department or that there is a GP referred patient who needs to be reviewed a message will be sent via Smartphone. The Specialist Registrar receives an e-mail alert and then allocates the job within the team. On receiving the e-mail it will be the inpatient team’s goal to see the patient within one hour of referral thereby ensuring no delays.”

Source location

2013-0317-Response-by-Heatherwood-Wexham-Park-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 22 February 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce electronic MSS calculation of EDOD scores in the Emergency Department.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The new MSS system was introduced in the Emergency Department on 14 January 2014 and has an added function of calculating the EDOD score electronically thereby reducing the possibility of wrong calculations.”

Source location

2013-0317-Response-by-Heatherwood-Wexham-Park-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 22 February 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit compliance with accurate EDOD score calculation and appropriate algorithm use.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, in addition I wanted to specifically point out that a new Policy i.e. TPP 231 (enclosed) which focuses on the Management of the Deteriorating Adult Patient was introduced in August 2013. This Policy has introduced a new requirement for ensuring that the EDOD score calculation is verified by another member of staff to reduce inaccuracies as was in this case. An audit capturing the number of correctly calculated EDOD scores was carried out in July 2013 and the results of this audit highlighted very good compliance; with all standards exceeding the 90% mark and as well as showing that every patient with an increased EDOD score had the algorithm followed appropriately.”

Source location

2013-0317-Response-by-Heatherwood-Wexham-Park-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 22 February 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce a hospital referral procedure covering Emergency Department referrals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All referrals to the Hospital pass through the Emergency Department. On 14 January 2014 the Trust introduced a new Procedure for dealing with referrals to the hospital. Although some aspects of this new procedure are underway the electronic section is expected to go live in six weeks’ time. The electronic system will ensure that instead of using the bleep system to notify inpatient teams that there is a patient in the Emergency Department or that there is a GP referred patient who needs to be reviewed a message will be sent via Smartphone. The Specialist Registrar receives an e-mail alert and then allocates the job within the team. On receiving the e-mail it will be the inpatient team’s goal to see the patient within one hour of referral thereby ensuring no delays.”

Source location

2013-0317-Response-by-Heatherwood-Wexham-Park-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 22 February 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a 24-hour Central Hub with patient tracking, referral and bleep management, workload oversight, handover, task allocation, escalation and senior-manager staffing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has plans to introduce a 24 hours a day Central Hub system and the timescales for actions are stated in the enclosed action plan. It is envisaged the Hub will be located at Wexham Park Hospital and be equipped with IT systems and run by senior managers who will be responsible for ensuring the following:”

Source location

2013-0317-Response-by-Heatherwood-Wexham-Park-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 22 February 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen use of the SBAR communication tool when notifying doctors about patients requiring review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition TPP 231 has strengthened the use of Situation Background Assessment Recommendation (SBAR) tool. This is a communication tool used when notifying Doctors over the phone or in person of a patient for review. The tool ensures important information is conveyed in order to allow the Doctor to paint a picture of the patient’s condition and prioritise review as necessary.”

Source location

2013-0317-Response-by-Heatherwood-Wexham-Park-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 22 February 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement policy requiring independent verification of deteriorating-adult EDOD score calculations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, in addition I wanted to specifically point out that a new Policy i.e. TPP 231 (enclosed) which focuses on the Management of the Deteriorating Adult Patient was introduced in August 2013. This Policy has introduced a new requirement for ensuring that the EDOD score calculation is verified by another member of staff to reduce inaccuracies as was in this case. An audit capturing the number of correctly calculated EDOD scores was carried out in July 2013 and the results of this audit highlighted very good compliance; with all standards exceeding the 90% mark and as well as showing that every patient with an increased EDOD score had the algorithm followed appropriately.”

Source location

2013-0317-Response-by-Heatherwood-Wexham-Park-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 22 February 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026