PFD report

Malcolm John Rathmell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Feb 2019•Nottinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure to establish how or why the anticoagulation chart was mislabelled
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigationsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable formal safety-incident management processes
  2. Failure to maintain accurate patient identification on anticoagulation charts
  3. Failure to identify incorrect warfarin prescribing
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to identify clinically significant medication risksPart of recurring concern: Unsafe medication prescribing
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to establish how or why the anticoagulation chart was mislabelled

Wider context from the report

“(3) It has not been possible to establish how or why this happened despite an extensive investigation by the Trust and a detailed enquiry during the inquest. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations; Unreliable formal safety-incident management processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain accurate patient identification on anticoagulation charts

Wider context from the report

“(2) It has not been possible to identify when Patient B’s anti-coagulation chart was labeled with Mr Rathmell’s details, save that it is likely, on the balance of probabilities, that it took place on ward B3 between 1.30pm on 15.03.18 and 4.06am on 16.03.18. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to identify incorrect warfarin prescribing

Wider context from the report

“(1) Mr Rathmell was treated and reviewed by a number of medical professionals from various disciplines between 14.03.18 and 22.03.18. No one identified during that time that he was being prescribed warfarin incorrectly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to identify clinically significant medication risks; Unsafe medication prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to implement changes addressing the risk of incorrect prescribing

Wider context from the report

“(5) The proposed actions being considered by the Trust to address the issue of incorrect prescribing are in their infancy and other than sharing the learning from the SI report, no other changes or action has been implemented to address the risk of future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to implement identified safety actions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of ward-based pharmacy review

Wider context from the report

“(4) There was no ward based pharmacy review between 15.03.18 and 22.03.18. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably conduct clinically required medication reviews.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026