PFD report

Danny James Holt-Scarpens · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Mar 2020•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure of interagency working and sharing of key information
  2. Failure to make contemporaneous records and document decision-making rationale including capacity assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably document the rationale for consequential decisionsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable assessment and recording of patients’ mental capacity
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of interagency working and sharing of key information

Wider context from the report

“i. There should be better interagency working and sharing of key information between agencies who had contact with the deceased in the period leading up to his death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make contemporaneous records and document decision-making rationale including capacity assessments

Wider context from the report

“ii. The assessing crisis team clinician who undertook the telephone assessment with the deceased on the 30th July 2019, did not make contemporaneous records or document any decision-making rationale including detailing the capacity assessment undertaken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably document the rationale for consequential decisions; Unreliable assessment and recording of patients’ mental capacity.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.