PFD report

Mr Malcolm Marshall Shaw · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Jan 2019•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Unavailability of a revised training programme for patient safety investigators
  2. Failure to conduct rigorous patient safety investigations
  3. Lack of guidance for frontline staff on promptly capturing evidence after falls
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigationsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable staff access to and understanding of safety-critical guidance
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Hold a training session for Executive Directors to improve consistency in investigation oversight and scrutiny.

    Stated by Stockport NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 May 2019.
  2. Action

    Run the Safer Mobility Collaborative, including immediate post-fall assessment, staff statements and patient discussions to confirm safety actions.

    Stated by Stockport NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 May 2019.
  3. Action

    Provide in-depth training on gathering and writing investigation statements.

    Stated by Stockport NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 May 2019.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of a revised training programme for patient safety investigators

Wider context from the report

“Whilst the court heard evidence of significant improvements the Trust has made to the way it undertakes investigations, it is a matter of residual concern that the organisation has yet to launch a revised programme of investigation training for those who undertake patient safety investigations. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to conduct rigorous patient safety investigations

Wider context from the report

“In view of the fundamental importance of rigorous patient safety investigations whose conclusions are capable of withstanding logical analysis to improving care, it is a matter of concern that the Trust’s original investigation into the circumstances of Mr Shaw’s fall (which had presumably passed through the Trust’s own quality assurance mechanisms) was manifestly and fundamentally flawed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of guidance for frontline staff on promptly capturing evidence after falls

Wider context from the report

“Specifically in relation to cases involving falls, it remains of concern that frontline staff do not appear to have been provided with any guidance as to how to capture the best available evidence as to the circumstances of the fall as soon as reasonably possible after the incident. This is a matter of particular concern bearing in mind the potential benefits such an approach would bring to the Trust’s ongoing efforts to understand the causes of falls on wards with a view to trying to prevent as many of them as possible. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations; Unreliable staff access to and understanding of safety-critical guidance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hold a training session for Executive Directors to improve consistency in investigation oversight and scrutiny.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A training session is to be held with the Executive Directors on 12 March 2019, this will support consistency of overview and scrutiny of investigations.”

Source location

2019-0007-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 23 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Run the Safer Mobility Collaborative, including immediate post-fall assessment, staff statements and patient discussions to confirm safety actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• In June 2018 the Trust launched a Safer Mobility Collaborative aimed at reducing inpatient falls by March 2019. Part of the collaborative included the launch of an immediate assessment of the circumstances of the fall, taking statements from staff and talking with the patient to assess that all actions to ensure patient safety are in place.”

Source location

2019-0007-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 23 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide in-depth training on gathering and writing investigation statements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• In September 2018 the Trust introduced training sessions with an in-depth focus on statement gathering and writing.”

Source location

2019-0007-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 23 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a checklist for final investigation panels to verify key investigation requirements, including team training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• In February 2019 the Trust has implemented a check list to be completed at the time the panel meet to hear the final investigation report. The check list, advocated as best practice by NHS Improvement, supports the Executive Director in identifying if the key requirements for a good investigation have been met during the investigation. The checklist includes identification of the training status of the investigation team; that is whether they have received appropriate training”

Source location

2019-0007-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 23 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Launch revised patient safety investigation training and widen participation beyond the small specialist team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The launch of the revised programme of investigation training for those who undertake patient safety investigations”

Source location

2019-0007-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 23 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide quarterly Root Cause Analysis training through the Quality Governance Team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that programme of investigation training has been developed and launched. We have the following programme in place:”

Source location

2019-0007-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 23 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use thrice-weekly Quality Safety Leadership Summits to monitor falls, confirm investigations have started and verify inclusion of immediate statements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• In January 2019, the Trust further enhanced its approaches to monitoring falls via our Quality Safety Leadership Summit, held three times a week. At this meeting, senior nurses are able to ensure that full investigations have started and include immediate statements. The Trust is pleased to report that it continues to be on target to reduce the number of falls within the organisation.”

Source location

2019-0007-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 23 May 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Develop and use the Patient Safety Collaborative methodology to support quality improvement.

    Stated by Stockport NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 May 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and use the Patient Safety Collaborative methodology to support quality improvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I understand that ████████ was able to describe some of the actions put in place since Mr Shaw’s fall to support staff in these situations. These have been expanded on further, and include:”

Source location

2019-0007-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 23 May 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026