PFD report

Stephen Mark SHAYLOR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Dec 2017•Exeter and Greater Devon

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Reliance on continuous CCTV monitoring to detect prisoner self-harm
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate CCTV coverage and monitoring in custodial settingsPart of recurring concern: Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisonersPart of recurring concern: Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systemsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable CCTV detection and tracking of people at riskPart of recurring concern: Unreliable safety CCTV monitoring systems
  2. Insufficient stabilisation-wing capacity for inmates needing detoxification
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient inpatient detoxification capacity
  3. Intermittent night welfare checks and ACCT observations
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to carry out required overnight checksPart of recurring concern: Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisonersPart of recurring concern: Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Have healthcare staff attend ACCT reviews, record their participation, and contribute substance-misuse and detoxification risk information.

    Stated by Care UKStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2018.
  2. Action

    Conduct overnight welfare checks using daily printed checklists and review completed checks the following day.

    Stated by Care UKStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    HMPPS owns and operates the ACCT process; healthcare staff contribute risk information but do not oversee or monitor it.

    Stated by Care UKRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reliance on continuous CCTV monitoring to detect prisoner self-harm

Wider context from the report

“(3) Night welfare checks and observations on an ACCT document are at best intermittent and rely on continuous CCTV monitoring could spot a prisoner self-harming. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate CCTV coverage and monitoring in custodial settings; Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisoners; Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systems; Unreliable CCTV detection and tracking of people at risk; Unreliable safety CCTV monitoring systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient stabilisation-wing capacity for inmates needing detoxification

Wider context from the report

“(1) There were 38 places available on a corridor in C4 wing as a stabilisation wing for dealing with inmates subject to Healthcare night welfare checks. Head of Residence and Safety told the Court that the Prison received between 60 – 80 inmates per week needing detox and requiring placement in C4 cells which had doors with larger windows for checking patients at night. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient inpatient detoxification capacity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Intermittent night welfare checks and ACCT observations

Wider context from the report

“(3) Night welfare checks and observations on an ACCT document are at best intermittent and rely on continuous CCTV monitoring could spot a prisoner self-harming. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to carry out required overnight checks; Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisoners; Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequacy of healthcare night welfare checks for determining whether prisoners are breathing or alive

Wider context from the report

“(2) Professor Wall, substance misuse expert, said that the system for looking after these inmates was not fit for purpose and that healthcare night welfare checks (looking through a hatch in a cell door) were inadequate because it was not possible to ascertain if a prisoner was breathing/alive by this method. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable prison cell-hatch observation of prisoners; Unreliable welfare-check processes for people whose health is of concern.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Have healthcare staff attend ACCT reviews, record their participation, and contribute substance-misuse and detoxification risk information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. The ACCT process is a prison process and is operated and owned by HMPPS using prison documentation. To that extent, the overview and monitoring of the ACCT process does not sit with the healthcare team. However, any member of staff working at the prison can open an ACCT if they identify risks. Healthcare staff from the SMS, primary health or mental health team will attend ACCT reviews and record this on SystmOne. Therefore, these health care staff are responsible for contributing their knowledge regarding any risk factors which may include issues pertaining to substance misuse or detox. In my previous letter I had intended to underline that the use of the night welfare check has never been intended to replace ACCT documentation. This is simply because there are many prisoners suffering from substance withdrawal who would not require an ACCT; i.e.”

Source location

2017-0380-Response-by-Care-UK
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct overnight welfare checks using daily printed checklists and review completed checks the following day.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Night welfare checks are carried out by Health Care Assistants (HCAs). At the start of the night shift, the nurse and HCA will print off the relevant welfare check list which will show all new additions made that day, as well as those prisoners who are already on the list. HCAs will then use that list and the printed template to assist them in conducting checks overnight. A copy of the template used was provided under cover of my first letter.”

Source location

2017-0380-Response-by-Care-UK
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

HMPPS owns and operates the ACCT process; healthcare staff contribute risk information but do not oversee or monitor it.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. The ACCT process is a prison process and is operated and owned by HMPPS using prison documentation. To that extent, the overview and monitoring of the ACCT process does not sit with the healthcare team. However, any member of staff working at the prison can open an ACCT if they identify risks. Healthcare staff from the SMS, primary health or mental health team will attend ACCT reviews and record this on SystmOne. Therefore, these health care staff are responsible for contributing their knowledge regarding any risk factors which may include issues pertaining to substance misuse or detox. In my previous letter I had intended to underline that the use of the night welfare check has never been intended to replace ACCT documentation. This is simply because there are many prisoners suffering from substance withdrawal who would not require an ACCT; i.e.”

Source location

2017-0380-Response-by-Care-UK
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026