PFD report

Helen Jane Kerr · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Sep 2024•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
13

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Failure to access relevant police records during assessment
  2. Failure to inform refuge workers of a relevant police presentation
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of police operational communications to reliably share safety-critical information
  3. Lack of evidenced efficacy of implemented changes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.8

  1. Action

    Remind response officers to undertake timely research, using the Force Control Room when necessary, through force emails and daily briefings.

    Stated by Surrey PoliceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 18 September 2024.
  2. Action

    Test and roll out the digital Psychiatric Liaison Service assessment template with mandatory collateral-information fields and recorded reasons when information is unavailable.

    Stated by Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 18 September 2024.
  3. Action

    Use revised SBAR documentation to include carer and family views in decision-making.

    Stated by Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 September 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.6

  1. Position

    Adult Social Care is responsible for facilitating any appropriate onward information sharing with the refuge after multi-agency assessment.

    Stated by Surrey PoliceRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to access relevant police records during assessment

Wider context from the report

“(2) Ms Kerr was seen at the police station and hospital in an extremely psychotic and paranoid state. Police records showed that she had been arrested and charged with carrying a bladed article. It was also recorded that she had subsequently carried a nail file, for her own protection. The officer who saw Ms Kerr on the 31st March 2023 was unable to read the records because Ms Kerr’s condition meant that the officer could not leave the interview room before Ms Kerr decided to leave the station. The risk this posed to the public was therefore not considered. No action was subsequently taken in relation to the risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to inform refuge workers of a relevant police presentation

Wider context from the report

“(4) The refuge was not made aware of Ms Kerr’s presentation on the 31st March 2023 by Surrey Police. Her delusions about the actions of refuge workers could have put them in danger. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of police operational communications to reliably share safety-critical information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of evidenced efficacy of implemented changes

Wider context from the report

“(1) Cogent information about Ms Kerr’s declining mental health was provided repeatedly to Surrey and Borders Partnership secondary mental health teams from the refuge support workers. It was not explored with them, and insufficient weight was given to it during the triage process. Ms Kerr was not provided with appropriate and timely referrals for mental health treatment. Despite the evident significant changes are being put in place the efficacy of these changes has not yet been evidenced. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to appropriately assess declining mental health information and provide timely mental health referrals

Wider context from the report

“(1) Cogent information about Ms Kerr’s declining mental health was provided repeatedly to Surrey and Borders Partnership secondary mental health teams from the refuge support workers. It was not explored with them, and insufficient weight was given to it during the triage process. Ms Kerr was not provided with appropriate and timely referrals for mental health treatment. Despite the evident significant changes are being put in place the efficacy of these changes has not yet been evidenced. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise and respond to deteriorating mental health in service users; Inadequate mental health assessment before care decisions; Unreliable mental health referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of timely out-of-hours information sharing between police, mental health agencies and adult safeguarding

Wider context from the report

“(3) The SCARF process does not enable information sharing between the Police, Mental Health Agencies and Surrey Adult Safeguarding out of hours. It is under review. It remains unclear how information sharing out of hours is to be achieved in a timely fashion to safeguard individuals and the public. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable interagency sharing of safeguarding risk information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to assess and act on risk to the public

Wider context from the report

“(2) Ms Kerr was seen at the police station and hospital in an extremely psychotic and paranoid state. Police records showed that she had been arrested and charged with carrying a bladed article. It was also recorded that she had subsequently carried a nail file, for her own protection. The officer who saw Ms Kerr on the 31st March 2023 was unable to read the records because Ms Kerr’s condition meant that the officer could not leave the interview room before Ms Kerr decided to leave the station. The risk this posed to the public was therefore not considered. No action was subsequently taken in relation to the risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind response officers to undertake timely research, using the Force Control Room when necessary, through force emails and daily briefings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a point of learning, all officers are being reminded to ensure that research is undertaken as soon as practicable when dealing with members of the public, including asking the Force Control Room to do so on their behalf when it is impracticable to do so themselves. In this instance, by asking the Force Control Room, this would have enabled an alternative Surrey Police employee to assess previous information held on Surrey Police systems whilst they were engaging with Ms Kerr. This message will be conveyed by force emails and a reminder on the daily briefing to response officers. We fully accept that this research should have been conducted in order to inform the officer’s decision making.”

Source location

Response from Surrey Police
Page 1 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Test and roll out the digital Psychiatric Liaison Service assessment template with mandatory collateral-information fields and recorded reasons when information is unavailable.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Further progress has been made in the development of a digital solution which will more robustly support the obtaining and recording of collateral information. A collateral history section has been added to the new PLS assessment template as a mandatory field. There is also a section where a reason must be provided if collateral information has not been obtained. The roll out of the new assessment template has been expedited to the Psychiatric Liaison Services and is currently being tested in two of our PLS services as part of our quality improvement approach and in order to trial clinical effectiveness. Full roll out is anticipated to be completed by the end of 2024.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Borders Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use revised SBAR documentation to include carer and family views in decision-making.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the above improvements, the Trust website was updated to provide detail to external professionals on the different routes for emergency, urgent and routine referrals. There is now greater collaboration with family and referrers, supported by changes to the SBAR (a structured tool for communicating and sharing information which requires recording of the Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation) to now include carer/family views which are factored into decision making.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Borders Partnership
Page 1 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update, ratify and disseminate the Psychiatric Liaison Service operating policy on obtaining collateral information and using practitioner support during lone working.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During the inquest, the Trust also provided written evidence of improvements that had been implemented in the Psychiatric Liaison Service (“PLS”), particularly in relation to ensuring that collateral information is obtained. The PLS Standard Operational Policy (“SOP”) has now been updated to reflect these changes. This document was ratified and disseminated to all PLS teams in September 2024. The improvements include an emphasis on identifying the relevant sources of collateral information and the process that should be followed when a clinician is unable to access relevant collateral information. It outlines that, in these circumstances, consideration should be given to delaying discharge to allow further attempts to obtain collateral and formulate a safe discharge plan.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Borders Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Test new Single Point of Access procedures and apply quality-control review to assess consistent implementation and identify service improvements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The implementation of the new SPA procedures is currently subject to testing in line with our quality improvement approach. The aim of this is to provide assurance that the new processes are applied consistently and are embedded. We have introduced a quality control process within SPA and the ongoing testing and review will allow us to identify other ways in which the service can be optimised. As part of this work, we are taking additional steps to enhance the out of hours offer.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Borders Partnership
Page 1 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver training across i-access services on recognising psychosis and making timely mental-health referrals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Further learning is reflected in the production of training which has been developed and rolled out across our i-access services. This focuses on recognising signs and symptoms of psychosis and the importance of a timely referral to mental health services for assessment. To date, 86% of relevant staff have viewed this training and it is planned that the remaining staff (who have been unable to do so due to absence from work) will have viewed this by 15 November 2024.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Borders Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct random dip audits of assessments across the five Psychiatric Liaison Services to monitor collateral-information practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A random dip audit of assessments across our five PLS services in September 2024 confirms a trajectory of improvement in that collateral information was sought in 90% of cases, as compared to 80% when the same audit was conducted in June 2024.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Borders Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require senior oversight of Single Point of Access triage and recording of referrer collateral information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the PFD report, you highlighted that a considerable amount of evidence has been provided by the Trust of the changes around prescribing referrals into our services. In particular, the PFD report notes that referrals into the Single Point of Access (“SPA”) can now be made by voluntary agencies and new protocols require more senior oversight of triaging decisions and recording of collateral information from referrers.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Borders Partnership
Page 1 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Adult Social Care is responsible for facilitating any appropriate onward information sharing with the refuge after multi-agency assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Information sharing protocols are in place with statutory partners. The refuge is not a statutory partner, so with regard to the sharing of SCARF, there would be no existing process that would include them in Surrey Police’s safeguarding information sharing protocols. Adult Social Care would be responsible and facilitate any onward information sharing if appropriate, based on a multi-agency assessment.”

Source location

Response from Surrey Police
Page 3 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

There was no information at the time indicating that Ms Kerr posed a risk to herself or the public.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although Ms Kerr did previously carry a nail file for her own protection, the officer would have required grounds to search Ms Kerr. Although some forces are operating a pilot allowing them to search a person with a previous conviction of a weapons offence, who has a court order made against them upon conviction, Surrey is not a pilot force, and Ms Kerr was in any case highly unlikely to have met the required threshold for such an order. Therefore, an officer would rely on the powers conveyed in Section 1 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act to conduct a search in order to do so, they would need to have reasonable grounds to suspect that they will find something prohibited (i.e. a weapon). At the relevant time, the officer did not have this suspicion. There was no information at the time to suggest Ms Kerr was a risk to either herself or the public at large.”

Source location

Response from Surrey Police
Page 2 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing emergency communication routes provide sufficient means to share information and formulate safety plans for imminent out-of-hours risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There are numerous things that officers can do in terms of informing our partners about more imminent risk. The primary one is the Emergency Duty Team (EDT) – this process is long established for response officers. This is person-to-person communication between agencies, where agreements can be made and issues escalated. Likewise, there are other methods, such as the professionals / crisis line / Accident and Emergency departments etc. All of these are 24/7 where ‘real time’ concerns can be discussed and safety plans formulated.”

Source location

Response from Surrey Police
Page 2 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing Professionals and Crisis Lines provide the appropriate urgent information-sharing and crisis referral pathways, so SCARF need not provide crisis access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The PFD Report also outlines a concern that the Single Combined Assessment of Risk Form, known as a SCARF, does not enable information sharing between organisations out of hours. The purpose of a SCARF is to help police officers to record and raise safeguarding concerns and observations about the needs, vulnerabilities and risk issues relating to those who come into contact with the police. A SCARF is not designed to be used to access crisis support or obtain emergency assistance. If the police have concerns which require urgent attention or advice, there is a dedicated Professionals Line which operates 365 days a year, 24 hours a day.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Borders Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Surrey Police is responsible for addressing the other matters raised in the PFD report.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The other matters within the PFD Report relate solely to Surrey Police and I will therefore allow that organisation to address those issues directly.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Borders Partnership
Page 3 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing Emergency Duty Team and police contact processes adequately support urgent out-of-hours referrals; SCARF need not be shared outside office hours.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Scarf Process is not designed to be used as an emergency referral out of hours. There is a clear, well known and well used process for officers, in that they must contact the Emergency Duty Team outside hours, if they need urgent social care intervention. The EDT has a single number that is published on the SCC website https://www.surreycc.gov.uk/adults/care-and-support/contact . This has not changed for many years. In terms of the Police the relevant numbers are included within all of the Mental Health briefing products (briefing slides, routine orders) and the force Mental Health guide which is available via officer’s mobile devices and their intranet hub. The number is also included within all of their training products relating to s136.”

Source location

Response-from-Surrey-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Enable voluntary agencies to refer into the Single Point of Access.

    Stated by Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 September 2024.
  2. 2

    Develop a case formulation and learning presentation on the inquest findings for Psychiatric Liaison Service clinicians.

    Stated by Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 September 2024.
  3. 3

    Update the website with emergency, urgent and routine referral routes for external professionals.

    Stated by Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 September 2024.
  4. 4

    Present the inquest learning and clinicians’ responsibilities to all Psychiatric Liaison Service teams.

    Stated by Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 18 September 2024.
  5. 5

    Take additional steps to enhance the out-of-hours service offer.

    Stated by Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 18 September 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Enable voluntary agencies to refer into the Single Point of Access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the PFD report, you highlighted that a considerable amount of evidence has been provided by the Trust of the changes around prescribing referrals into our services. In particular, the PFD report notes that referrals into the Single Point of Access (“SPA”) can now be made by voluntary agencies and new protocols require more senior oversight of triaging decisions and recording of collateral information from referrers.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Borders Partnership
Page 1 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a case formulation and learning presentation on the inquest findings for Psychiatric Liaison Service clinicians.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Alongside the changes to the SOP and the digital assessment template, a case formulation and presentation outlining the learning from Ms Kerr’s inquest has been developed by one of the divisional Nurse Consultants. This provides a forum for reflection and learning to ensure that clinicians understand the factors that were relevant to Ms Kerr’s sad death, and their responsibilities in implementing the improvements that the Trust has made. The case formulation supports the translation of the learning into changes in practice and will have been presented to all PLS teams by the end of November 2024.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Borders Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the website with emergency, urgent and routine referral routes for external professionals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the above improvements, the Trust website was updated to provide detail to external professionals on the different routes for emergency, urgent and routine referrals. There is now greater collaboration with family and referrers, supported by changes to the SBAR (a structured tool for communicating and sharing information which requires recording of the Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation) to now include carer/family views which are factored into decision making.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Borders Partnership
Page 1 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present the inquest learning and clinicians’ responsibilities to all Psychiatric Liaison Service teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Alongside the changes to the SOP and the digital assessment template, a case formulation and presentation outlining the learning from Ms Kerr’s inquest has been developed by one of the divisional Nurse Consultants. This provides a forum for reflection and learning to ensure that clinicians understand the factors that were relevant to Ms Kerr’s sad death, and their responsibilities in implementing the improvements that the Trust has made. The case formulation supports the translation of the learning into changes in practice and will have been presented to all PLS teams by the end of November 2024.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Borders Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Take additional steps to enhance the out-of-hours service offer.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The implementation of the new SPA procedures is currently subject to testing in line with our quality improvement approach. The aim of this is to provide assurance that the new processes are applied consistently and are embedded. We have introduced a quality control process within SPA and the ongoing testing and review will allow us to identify other ways in which the service can be optimised. As part of this work, we are taking additional steps to enhance the out of hours offer.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Borders Partnership
Page 1 · response
Published 18 September 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026