PFD report

Jennifer Elsie RUSHWORTH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Oct 2013•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Delays in cardiology review for patients proposed for surgery
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely cardiology assessmentPart of recurring concern: Inadequate preoperative assessment of surgical suitability and risk
  2. Failure to include surgeons’ input in theatre booking
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital theatre booking and availability coordination
  3. Insufficient surgeon capacity for laparoscopic surgery and urgent patient assessment
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient clinical staffing capacity for timely surgical carePart of recurring concern: Insufficient medical staffing capacity for timely patient care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in cardiology review for patients proposed for surgery

Wider context from the report

“The first of the issues that he raised was the fact that it is quite normal for cardiology review to take anything up to six months to come through to the surgeon proposed to operate on the patient. In this particular instance the first consultation with the surgeon took place on 5 July 2012 and in view of her cardiac history he referred her to the cardiologist for cardiac optimisation review. Report back from the cardiologist came on 28 January 2013. It seems to me unsatisfactory that this length of time should elapse for cardiology reviews in these circumstances. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely cardiology assessment; Inadequate preoperative assessment of surgical suitability and risk.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to include surgeons’ input in theatre booking

Wider context from the report

“Secondly the surgeon indicated that the booking of theatres and follow-up therefrom is dealt with by the management and not from any input from the surgeons themselves. ████████ indicated that it was for this reason that there was a delay in booking this lady in to surgery and that delay may have had a bearing on her wellbeing at the time of surgery but more particularly during the recovery period. Again I would have thought that an input from the surgeons would have been the prime consideration that bed managers should be looking at when booking theatres, etc. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital theatre booking and availability coordination.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient surgeon capacity for laparoscopic surgery and urgent patient assessment

Wider context from the report

“Thirdly ████████ indicated that there are simply not enough surgeons dealing with this type of laparoscopic surgery and to deal with the number of patient's requiring their care. They are simply unavailable to perform these operations and therefore the operations are later than would often be desirable and this can of course have quite devastating effects. Finally he also indicated that they needed to be seeing this type of patient more urgently and again they cannot do this simply because there are insufficient surgeons available for the number of cases that they are expected to deal with. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient clinical staffing capacity for timely surgical care; Insufficient medical staffing capacity for timely patient care.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.