PFD report

Kenneth George Bailey · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Jul 2015•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Insufficient manning of the local fire station
  2. Danger of unqualified people attempting rescue during delayed emergency-service arrival
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Recruit staff through internal and external routes, including inter-brigade transfers and applications from existing on-call personnel, for Mossley’s revised duty system.

    Stated by Greater Manchester Combined AuthorityStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 July 2015.
  2. Action

    Approve a revised 12-person, 24-hour self-rostered duty system for Mossley Fire Station.

    Stated by Greater Manchester Combined AuthorityStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 July 2015.
  3. Action

    Implement the revised Mossley duty system providing a 12-hour station-based day shift and 12-hour on-call cover within four minutes.

    Stated by Greater Manchester Combined AuthorityStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 July 2015.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The traditional retained-firefighter model cannot be sustained because recruitment is constrained by required standards, local availability, pay and workload.

    Stated by Greater Manchester Combined AuthorityUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient manning of the local fire station

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the evidence I was told of the efforts of neighbours and others to attempt a rescue, which to some extent they were able to do. One reason for this attempted rescue was because of the time lapse in getting fire appliances to the scene. I was informed that there is a Fire Station in Mossley, Ashton u Lyne, but this is only manned during very limited opening hours. I was also informed that there is a significant body of volunteers prepared to act as local volunteer fire officers. Because the fire station was not manned, it took approximately 10 minutes for the fire service to arrive, and whilst this is of course reasonably fast, the local people felt the response time used to be quicker when the local “station” was open. If there is a delay in the arrival of the emergency services, there is always the danger that unqualified people will try to perform a rescue thus placing themselves in danger of injury or even death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Danger of unqualified people attempting rescue during delayed emergency-service arrival

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the evidence I was told of the efforts of neighbours and others to attempt a rescue, which to some extent they were able to do. One reason for this attempted rescue was because of the time lapse in getting fire appliances to the scene. I was informed that there is a Fire Station in Mossley, Ashton u Lyne, but this is only manned during very limited opening hours. I was also informed that there is a significant body of volunteers prepared to act as local volunteer fire officers. Because the fire station was not manned, it took approximately 10 minutes for the fire service to arrive, and whilst this is of course reasonably fast, the local people felt the response time used to be quicker when the local “station” was open. If there is a delay in the arrival of the emergency services, there is always the danger that unqualified people will try to perform a rescue thus placing themselves in danger of injury or even death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recruit staff through internal and external routes, including inter-brigade transfers and applications from existing on-call personnel, for Mossley’s revised duty system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A process has commenced to undertake internal and external recruitment for the roles. This includes approaching other Fire and Rescue Services and to explore opportunities for inter-”

Source location

2015-0275-Response-by-Greater-Manchester-Fire-and-Rescue-Service
Page 3 · response
Published 14 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Approve a revised 12-person, 24-hour self-rostered duty system for Mossley Fire Station.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In light of the struggles we have had to recruit sufficient staff that met the required criteria. GMFRS have recently reflected on the current campaign and an alternative solution has recently been considered and approved by the Fire Authority. This decision stems from the fact that despite our efforts and those of the Mossley community up until the 22nd of July 2015 we only had 3 viable candidates to put forward to undertake basic training, as 3 of the 6 applicants who met the attendance criteria, failed the physical elements of the National Firefighter Skills Test.”

Source location

2015-0275-Response-by-Greater-Manchester-Fire-and-Rescue-Service
Page 3 · response
Published 14 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the revised Mossley duty system providing a 12-hour station-based day shift and 12-hour on-call cover within four minutes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A revised duty system based on wholetime staff was approved on the 23rd of July 2015. The revised crewing system will be based on 12 staff working a 24 hour self rostered duty system. This will provide a 12 hour day shift working from the station and within the community and 12 hours ‘on-call’ cover within a 4 minute attendance time to the station. This is the preferred option following the unsuccessful retained recruitment campaign.”

Source location

2015-0275-Response-by-Greater-Manchester-Fire-and-Rescue-Service
Page 3 · response
Published 14 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a retained-firefighter recruitment campaign, including community outreach, taster sessions, testing and eligibility checks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The second retained process was initiated by GMFRS following the death of Mr. Bailey. Local help and support was given by ████████ who lived next door to Mr. Bailey, and was one of the ████████ also gathered support of local residents, utilising social media, and this helped to attract a much higher level of interest.”

Source location

2015-0275-Response-by-Greater-Manchester-Fire-and-Rescue-Service
Page 3 · response
Published 14 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The traditional retained-firefighter model cannot be sustained because recruitment is constrained by required standards, local availability, pay and workload.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Eligibility checks for all applications (including those who did not attend testing), took place, however, only 6 of the 30 applicants currently met the attendance criteria of living within a four minute footprint of the station.”

Source location

2015-0275-Response-by-Greater-Manchester-Fire-and-Rescue-Service
Page 3 · response
Published 14 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Night-time cover from surrounding stations, standby moves and mutual aid are considered sufficient to meet Mossley’s published response standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The current duty system at Mossley, has been in place since November 2013, and is based on 10 staff comprising of 3 Officers and 7 Firefighters, working 10.5 hour days, 7 days per week. The night time fire cover for the Mossley area is provided primarily by Ashton, Stalybridge and Oldham fire stations to give cover that meets the published response standards (Appendix 3), as far as reasonably practicable. The response standards based on our current risk modelling and up to the present date (including the incident on the 25th March 2015) we have achieved our set response standard times for all of the Primary Fires we have attended during the shift period that Mossley Station does not have a Crewed fire engine (i.e. the night shift) (Appendix 4).”

Source location

2015-0275-Response-by-Greater-Manchester-Fire-and-Rescue-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 14 July 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Continue consulting communities and partners to keep them informed about local appliance crewing arrangements.

    Stated by Greater Manchester Combined AuthorityStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 July 2015.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue consulting communities and partners to keep them informed about local appliance crewing arrangements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Once again please allow me to express my deepest condolences to Mr Bailey’s family. GMFRS are committed to protecting all our communities and providing a response based on the level of risk associated with the area. We will do this by providing a local and sustainable solution to how appliances are crewed and will continue to consult to ensure our communities and partners are fully informed.”

Source location

2015-0275-Response-by-Greater-Manchester-Fire-and-Rescue-Service
Page 4 · response
Published 14 July 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026