PFD report

JOAN DOROTHY RICHARDSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 23 Jun 2014•West Yorkshire Eastern

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to identify urgent presentations requiring immediate hospital referral
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable emergency access to hospital care
  2. Unavailability of a doctor to respond to genuine emergencies during routine surgery closures
  3. Failure to provide advance, clear and specific notice of GP surgery closures
    Part of recurring concern: Unclear and unreliable GP access and referral pathways
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Send a joint letter to Leeds practices reminding them of obligations for safe cover and clear urgent-care communications during training closures.

    Stated by NHS Leeds West Clinical Commissioning GroupStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 June 2014.
  2. Action

    Make a statement at a centrally organised TARGET event in each Leeds CCG reiterating obligations and recommendations for safe access during training closures.

    Stated by NHS Leeds West Clinical Commissioning GroupStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 June 2014.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    NHS England is responsible for enforcing practices’ contractual obligations, including medical cover during training closures.

    Stated by NHS Leeds West Clinical Commissioning GroupRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to identify urgent presentations requiring immediate hospital referral

Wider context from the report

“(5) No criticism is made that a precise diagnosis was not made. Nevertheless had Ms Richardson been seen on the 21st November 2013 it would have been obvious that she was extremely unwell and that her presentation was urgent and that time was of the essence and that she should have been referred to hospital immediately. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable emergency access to hospital care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of a doctor to respond to genuine emergencies during routine surgery closures

Wider context from the report

“(3) On the occasions where there is a genuine emergency as there clearly was here, a Doctor should be available to deal with such an emergency notwithstanding that the surgery is closed for routine work, particularly when the training session is within normal surgery hours. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide advance, clear and specific notice of GP surgery closures

Wider context from the report

“(2) This should be advertised well in advance by notices in the waiting area and in the entrances to the surgery with clear and specific instructions so that patients can seek emergency treatment elsewhere. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unclear and unreliable GP access and referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Send a joint letter to Leeds practices reminding them of obligations for safe cover and clear urgent-care communications during training closures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have discussed the recommendations of your report with my colleagues, the Medical Directors of Leeds South & East CCG and Leeds North CCG, and we have agreed the following:”

Source location

2014-0276-Response-by-Leeds-West-Clinical-Commissioning-Group
Page 2 · response
Published 23 June 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make a statement at a centrally organised TARGET event in each Leeds CCG reiterating obligations and recommendations for safe access during training closures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have discussed the recommendations of your report with my colleagues, the Medical Directors of Leeds South & East CCG and Leeds North CCG, and we have agreed the following:”

Source location

2014-0276-Response-by-Leeds-West-Clinical-Commissioning-Group
Page 2 · response
Published 23 June 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS England is responsible for enforcing practices’ contractual obligations, including medical cover during training closures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Please accept my apologies for the delay in this response but, as you will be aware, I believed it was necessary to address four concerns raised in your report for me to coordinate a response, not just on behalf of NHS Leeds West Clinical Commissioning Group (the CCG), but also from NHS England (West Yorkshire Area Team). The latter organisation is responsible for the contractual obligations and performance of general practitioners and also for dealing with formal complaints when addressed to several parts of the NHS as in this case. The CCG is responsible, among other things, for supporting quality improvement in general practice which includes the commissioning of staff training as well as the necessary medical cover provided to maintain safe access to care for patients during training sessions.”

Source location

2014-0276-Response-by-Leeds-West-Clinical-Commissioning-Group
Page 1 · response
Published 23 June 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026