PFD report

Mrs Doris Douthwaite · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Sep 2018•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Risk of Falls Assessment Tool failing to provide clear and consistent guidance
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable falls risk assessment tools
  2. Failure to investigate repeated falls
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risksPart of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigations
  3. Lack of clear written requirements for communal-area supervision
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably supervise and monitor residents in care accommodation
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Risk of Falls Assessment Tool failing to provide clear and consistent guidance

Wider context from the report

“2. The Risk of Falls Assessment Tool currently used across HC-One’s homes was demonstrated in court to be unclear and susceptible to different interpretations. When asked about it in the course of her evidence, HC-One’s Area Director was not aware as to whether or not this Assessment Tool had recently been benchmarked as against others used within the industry; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable falls risk assessment tools.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to investigate repeated falls

Wider context from the report

“3. Notwithstanding the fact Mrs Douthwaite had 3 falls over the course of as many days in February 2018, HC-One had not, as at the date of the Inquest, undertaken any investigation into the circumstances of these. The absence of any investigation by HC-One in this respect represents a missed opportunity to ascertain if any learning can be derived from these incidents for the benefit of other residents. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clear written requirements for communal-area supervision

Wider context from the report

“1. The evidence before the court suggested that at Greatwood House, vulnerable residents including residents with dementia such as Mrs Douthwaite, may be left unsupervised at times in communal areas by carers undertaking other tasks. The evidence before the court was that there are currently no clear written requirements in force across HC-One’s homes mandating the attendance of a colleague to monitor the communal area in question before leaving it unattended; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably supervise and monitor residents in care accommodation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to supervise vulnerable residents in communal areas

Wider context from the report

“1. The evidence before the court suggested that at Greatwood House, vulnerable residents including residents with dementia such as Mrs Douthwaite, may be left unsupervised at times in communal areas by carers undertaking other tasks. The evidence before the court was that there are currently no clear written requirements in force across HC-One’s homes mandating the attendance of a colleague to monitor the communal area in question before leaving it unattended; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably supervise and monitor residents in care accommodation.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.