PFD report

Charles Stephen Rothwell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 Oct 2022•Cheshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of resources across primary, secondary and social care
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient social and community care provision to meet care and discharge needs
  2. Delays in handing over ambulance patients at A&E departments
    Part of recurring concern: Delays in ambulance-to-hospital patient handover
  3. Failure to match ambulance response capacity to demand
    Part of recurring concern: Delays in ambulance attendancePart of recurring concern: Insufficient ambulance service capacity for emergency calls
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Continue lobbying national bodies for changes to reduce hospital handover delays and improve ambulance capacity.

    Stated by Association of Ambulance Chief ExecutivesStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 10 October 2022.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    System-wide causes of ambulance delays must be addressed nationally by NHS England, the Department of Health and Social Care, and the wider health system.

    Stated by Association of Ambulance Chief ExecutivesRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of resources across primary, secondary and social care

Wider context from the report

“1) NWAS have developed a new triage system and have adopted NHS Pathways, which means that the initial call would now be triaged as Category 1 or 2. However, the problem of demand outstripping supply remains, such that if the same 999 call were made today the outcome would be the same. 2) NWAS continues to experience “exceptionally high demand” with the effect that “the demand completely outstrips the capability [they] have got.” 3) By way of example, I was told that yesterday afternoon Category 2 responses (which should attract attendance within 18 minutes) were sitting at an average of 75 minutes, Category 3 responses (which should attract attendance within 120 minutes) were sitting at an average of 10.5h and category 4 responses (which should prompt a further telephone assessment within 90 – 180 minutes) were sitting at an average of 11.5h. 4) With the approach of winter NWAS are also beginning to see an even greater increase in demand on top of the existing demand. 5) The problem is not due to a shortage of NWAS ambulances or staff but instead is the result of a wider issue linked to the lack of resources in primary, secondary and social care. This results in demand for ambulances outstripping supply and a backlog of ambulances waiting to handover patients at A&E departments because of a shortage of A&E beds, which in turn is because of shortages in social care. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient social and community care provision to meet care and discharge needs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in handing over ambulance patients at A&E departments

Wider context from the report

“1) NWAS have developed a new triage system and have adopted NHS Pathways, which means that the initial call would now be triaged as Category 1 or 2. However, the problem of demand outstripping supply remains, such that if the same 999 call were made today the outcome would be the same. 2) NWAS continues to experience “exceptionally high demand” with the effect that “the demand completely outstrips the capability [they] have got.” 3) By way of example, I was told that yesterday afternoon Category 2 responses (which should attract attendance within 18 minutes) were sitting at an average of 75 minutes, Category 3 responses (which should attract attendance within 120 minutes) were sitting at an average of 10.5h and category 4 responses (which should prompt a further telephone assessment within 90 – 180 minutes) were sitting at an average of 11.5h. 4) With the approach of winter NWAS are also beginning to see an even greater increase in demand on top of the existing demand. 5) The problem is not due to a shortage of NWAS ambulances or staff but instead is the result of a wider issue linked to the lack of resources in primary, secondary and social care. This results in demand for ambulances outstripping supply and a backlog of ambulances waiting to handover patients at A&E departments because of a shortage of A&E beds, which in turn is because of shortages in social care. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in ambulance-to-hospital patient handover.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to match ambulance response capacity to demand

Wider context from the report

“1) NWAS have developed a new triage system and have adopted NHS Pathways, which means that the initial call would now be triaged as Category 1 or 2. However, the problem of demand outstripping supply remains, such that if the same 999 call were made today the outcome would be the same. 2) NWAS continues to experience “exceptionally high demand” with the effect that “the demand completely outstrips the capability [they] have got.” 3) By way of example, I was told that yesterday afternoon Category 2 responses (which should attract attendance within 18 minutes) were sitting at an average of 75 minutes, Category 3 responses (which should attract attendance within 120 minutes) were sitting at an average of 10.5h and category 4 responses (which should prompt a further telephone assessment within 90 – 180 minutes) were sitting at an average of 11.5h. 4) With the approach of winter NWAS are also beginning to see an even greater increase in demand on top of the existing demand. 5) The problem is not due to a shortage of NWAS ambulances or staff but instead is the result of a wider issue linked to the lack of resources in primary, secondary and social care. This results in demand for ambulances outstripping supply and a backlog of ambulances waiting to handover patients at A&E departments because of a shortage of A&E beds, which in turn is because of shortages in social care. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in ambulance attendance; Insufficient ambulance service capacity for emergency calls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue lobbying national bodies for changes to reduce hospital handover delays and improve ambulance capacity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This is of course a system issue and AACE has constantly highlighted the impact of these delays on patients to both NHS England and DHSC. We will continue to do so and also support our members in engaging constructively with the wider health system to find solutions to the problem.”

Source location

Response from Association of Ambulance Chief Executives
Page 2 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

System-wide causes of ambulance delays must be addressed nationally by NHS England, the Department of Health and Social Care, and the wider health system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you have laid out in your fifth area above these are system issues and not merely ambulance issues and require a system led response to provide solutions. The following areas are contributing to ambulance response time delays nationally.”

Source location

Response from Association of Ambulance Chief Executives
Page 2 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

National demand-and-capacity modelling is to be led by NHS England rather than undertaken by the organisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The second issue in play here is that we believe that ambulance services no longer have the required capacity nationally to routinely deliver the nationally mandated response time targets even if the current handover delay issues were eliminated. This is due to an inexorable rise in demand for our services and an increasing level of acuity in terms of the calls being received. AACE has flagged this issue nationally repeatedly over the last few years and has called for a national piece of demand and capacity modelling across the sector led by NHSE. I am pleased to say that this is now gaining traction and whilst in its early stages is being pursued by NHSE at the present time.”

Source location

Response from Association of Ambulance Chief Executives
Page 2 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Continue supporting member ambulance trusts to engage with the wider health system on solutions that protect patients.

    Stated by Association of Ambulance Chief ExecutivesStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 10 October 2022.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Mandating or instructing ambulance services falls outside the organisation’s constituted authority.

    Stated by Association of Ambulance Chief ExecutivesOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue supporting member ambulance trusts to engage with the wider health system on solutions that protect patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This is of course a system issue and AACE has constantly highlighted the impact of these delays on patients to both NHS England and DHSC. We will continue to do so and also support our members in engaging constructively with the wider health system to find solutions to the problem.”

Source location

Response from Association of Ambulance Chief Executives
Page 2 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Mandating or instructing ambulance services falls outside the organisation’s constituted authority.

Verbatim wording from the response

“AACE is a private company owned by the English Ambulance NHS Trusts. It exists to provide ambulance services with a central organisation that supports, co-ordinates and implements nationally agreed policy. Our primary focus is the ongoing development of the English ambulance services and the improvement of patient care. It is a company owned by NHS organisations and possess the intellectual property rights of the Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee UK ambulance service clinical practice guidelines (the “JRCALC guidelines”). AACE is not constituted to mandate or instruct ambulance service however it has national influence via the regular meetings of ambulance Chief Executives and Trust Chairs along with a network of national specialist sub-groups.”

Source location

Response from Association of Ambulance Chief Executives
Page 1 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026