PFD report

John Lobo · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 11 May 2015•South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to obtain medical assessment of fitness and appropriate manner of patient transport
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Consider obtaining a second independent medical assessment for repatriations without insurer-provided facilities, particularly from distant countries.

    Stated by Exora Medical LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 11 May 2015.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing policy requires competent medical confirmation of fitness to travel, with the treating practitioner usually considered best placed to assess it.

    Stated by Exora Medical LimitedExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to obtain medical assessment of fitness and appropriate manner of patient transport

Wider context from the report

“The evidence disclosed that assessment of fitness to travel and of the manner in which the patient should be transported requires medical knowledge over and above that of a paramedic, and that reliance should not be placed wholly on family members and hospitals in distant countries. In cases involving direct repatriation without the facilities provided by an insurance company, consideration might be given to obtaining independent medical assessment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider obtaining a second independent medical assessment for repatriations without insurer-provided facilities, particularly from distant countries.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Notwithstanding the above, going forward we shall give consideration to obtaining a second and independent medical assessment in situations where facilities are not being provided by an insurance company for repatriation especially in circumstances where the repatriation is taking place from a distant country.”

Source location

2015-0182-Response-by-Exora-Medical
Page 1 · response
Published 11 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing policy requires competent medical confirmation of fitness to travel, with the treating practitioner usually considered best placed to assess it.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We would stress that, in accordance with our company policy, obtaining confirmation of fitness to travel from a competent medical practitioner always has been, and remains, an absolute requirement of Exora Medical Limited when accepting instructions to transfer any patient.”

Source location

2015-0182-Response-by-Exora-Medical
Page 1 · response
Published 11 May 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026