PFD report

Jean Mary Cutler · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Feb 2019•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
10

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised10

  1. Risk of vulnerable residents falling out of wheelchairs
  2. Vulnerability of residents to falls-related harm
  3. Inadequate assurance of wheelchair-fall risk management
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risksPart of recurring concern: Unreliable wheelchair fall-prevention controls
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Introduce and complete comprehensive Falls Risk Assessments for all residents, with monthly or condition-triggered recalculation.

    Stated by Cole Valley Nursing HomeStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 May 2019.
  2. Action

    Implement wheelchair risk assessments and lap-belt protocols, brief staff, provide care-folder access, and monitor compliance through management oversight.

    Stated by Cole Valley Nursing HomeStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 May 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Implemented control measures are considered sufficient to resolve the identified falls, wheelchair restraint and investigation concerns.

    Stated by Cole Valley Nursing HomeExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Risk of vulnerable residents falling out of wheelchairs

Wider context from the report

“4. However, the inconsistency of using lap belts outside the nursing home, but no similar restraint device when inside remains. The reliance on a member of staff being able to intervene in time continues despite the incident on 5/10/18 revealing the inadequacy of this as a safety measure. The nursing home has not investigated the availability and use of restraint devices inside the nursing home. My on-going concern is that there remains a risk of vulnerable residents falling out of wheelchairs. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Vulnerability of residents to falls-related harm

Wider context from the report

“1. Cole Valley Nursing Home is run by a private company and cares for up to 45 residents who are vulnerable due to their age and physical and mental health issues. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate assurance of wheelchair-fall risk management

Wider context from the report

“3. I heard evidence that following the incident the Care Quality Commission and Clinical Commission Group had requested from the nursing home copies of revised risk management documents. In my opinion this has led to the nursing home being given the impression their management of residents from falling out of wheelchairs is adequate. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Unreliable wheelchair fall-prevention controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undated and unsigned falls risk management and assessment documents

Wider context from the report

“6. The current falls Risk Management and Risk Assessment documents (requested by the CQC and CCG) are undated and unsigned and continue to place reliance on the presence of a staff member to prevent falls. My on-going concern is that the falls risk assessment has not being adequately completed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Unreliable completion and verification of falls-risk assessments; Unreliable documentation of falls-risk management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to investigate restraint-device availability and use inside the nursing home

Wider context from the report

“4. However, the inconsistency of using lap belts outside the nursing home, but no similar restraint device when inside remains. The reliance on a member of staff being able to intervene in time continues despite the incident on 5/10/18 revealing the inadequacy of this as a safety measure. The nursing home has not investigated the availability and use of restraint devices inside the nursing home. My on-going concern is that there remains a risk of vulnerable residents falling out of wheelchairs. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reliance on staff presence to prevent falls

Wider context from the report

“6. The current falls Risk Management and Risk Assessment documents (requested by the CQC and CCG) are undated and unsigned and continue to place reliance on the presence of a staff member to prevent falls. My on-going concern is that the falls risk assessment has not being adequately completed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inconsistent use of wheelchair lap belts across locations

Wider context from the report

“2. Pre-incident, the risk of residents falling from a wheelchair was recognised. There was an inconsistent approach to managing this risk; Outside the nursing home a lap belt would be attached to the wheelchair. Whereas inside the nursing home no lap belt was used. A member of staff was expected to be able to intervene when a resident was in the process of falling. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable wheelchair fall-prevention controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate post-incident investigation and organisational learning

Wider context from the report

“5. The nursing home’s internal investigation recognised as root causes of the incident a lack of internal knowledge and guidance, that the home had been through a hard time recently and it had impacted on the staff, that care plans did not give correct guidance to staff, and that management was unstable. However, the only post-action event listed was an ‘incident debrief’. The nursing home manager agreed when given evidence that the action plan would have been more effective if it had included a review of the falls risk assessment, the viability of restraint devices being used both outside and inside, and a review of whether staff numbers were adequate. My on-going concern is that the post incident investigation was inadequate and lessons have not been learned. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate completion of falls risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“6. The current falls Risk Management and Risk Assessment documents (requested by the CQC and CCG) are undated and unsigned and continue to place reliance on the presence of a staff member to prevent falls. My on-going concern is that the falls risk assessment has not being adequately completed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Unreliable completion and verification of falls-risk assessments.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reliance on staff intervention during wheelchair falls

Wider context from the report

“2. Pre-incident, the risk of residents falling from a wheelchair was recognised. There was an inconsistent approach to managing this risk; Outside the nursing home a lap belt would be attached to the wheelchair. Whereas inside the nursing home no lap belt was used. A member of staff was expected to be able to intervene when a resident was in the process of falling. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Unreliable wheelchair fall-prevention controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce and complete comprehensive Falls Risk Assessments for all residents, with monthly or condition-triggered recalculation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“ii) New, comprehensive Falls Risk Assessments (FRAs) for all residents have been introduced and completed. The FRAs consider internal and external risk factors, provide a risk score which then generates a “Low”, “Medium” or “High” risk rating (colour-coded Green, Amber or Red) and incorporate suggestions for risk management dependent on the level of risk identified. Risks will be recalculated on a (minimum) monthly basis (but sooner should an individual’s condition change i.e. through the contraction of an acute infection). Initial FRAs for people living in the Home were completed 03rd April 2019.”

Source location

2019-0040-Response-by-Cole-Valley-Nursing-Home
Page 2 · response
Published 26 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement wheelchair risk assessments and lap-belt protocols, brief staff, provide care-folder access, and monitor compliance through management oversight.

Verbatim wording from the response

“v) All nursing and care staff working at the Home have been made aware of the new Falls Risk Assessments and Wheelchair Risk Assessments during handover and in staff meetings. The new risk assessments are available within each person’s care folder – which staff have access to throughout the 24-hour period. The protocol for ensuring lap belts are used when people use their wheelchairs (as specified within the new Wheelchair Risk Assessment) has been reiterated to all staff and appropriate use and implementation is monitored by members of the Home’s management team.”

Source location

2019-0040-Response-by-Cole-Valley-Nursing-Home
Page 3 · response
Published 26 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implemented control measures are considered sufficient to resolve the identified falls, wheelchair restraint and investigation concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Cole Valley Nursing Home and its Directors accept and acknowledge the Coroner’s Concerns and believe that the control measures implemented by the Home serves to demonstrate how the Home and Cole Valley Care Ltd. have resolved said concerns - learning from both the inquest and the concerns detailed within your Regulation 28 report.”

Source location

2019-0040-Response-by-Cole-Valley-Nursing-Home
Page 3 · response
Published 26 May 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Appoint a competent, experienced permanent manager to provide leadership and governance at the Home.

    Stated by Cole Valley Nursing HomeStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 May 2019.
  2. 2

    Engage a Consultant Advisor to support governance, improvement and recruitment of a permanent manager.

    Stated by Cole Valley Nursing HomeStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 May 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Appoint a competent, experienced permanent manager to provide leadership and governance at the Home.

Verbatim wording from the response

“lack of effective governance and oversight. To compound issues, staff had been instructed by previous management not to use lap belts due to the risk of strangulation. This, however, had not been explored through comprehensive risk assessment. On 23rd February 2019 the Home’s manager was removed from post (as a result of additional concerns being identified about the manager’s action(s) and inaction(s)). The Home has sought and sourced a Consultant Advisor to support improvements within the Home and service provision with effect from 12th March 2019 – on an initial six-month contract. Part of his responsibility includes recruiting a competent and experienced permanent manager who will safeguard the interests of people living at the Home.”

Source location

2019-0040-Response-by-Cole-Valley-Nursing-Home
Page 2 · response
Published 26 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage a Consultant Advisor to support governance, improvement and recruitment of a permanent manager.

Verbatim wording from the response

“lack of effective governance and oversight. To compound issues, staff had been instructed by previous management not to use lap belts due to the risk of strangulation. This, however, had not been explored through comprehensive risk assessment. On 23rd February 2019 the Home’s manager was removed from post (as a result of additional concerns being identified about the manager’s action(s) and inaction(s)). The Home has sought and sourced a Consultant Advisor to support improvements within the Home and service provision with effect from 12th March 2019 – on an initial six-month contract. Part of his responsibility includes recruiting a competent and experienced permanent manager who will safeguard the interests of people living at the Home.”

Source location

2019-0040-Response-by-Cole-Valley-Nursing-Home
Page 2 · response
Published 26 May 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026