PFD report

Joshua Arthur Stafford Delaney · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Apr 2024•Inner South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of awareness among general practice doctors of the fatal overdose risks of Propranolol
  2. Failure to limit quantities of Propranolol prescribed to people at risk of overdose
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to apply overdose-risk safeguards to medication prescribingPart of recurring concern: Medication quantity controls failing to prevent unsafe access to excessive amountsPart of recurring concern: Unsafe medication prescribing
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Engage NICE to strengthen cautions about the risks of propranolol use.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 15 April 2024.
  2. Action

    Engage MHRA regarding communications about propranolol risks.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 15 April 2024.
  3. Action

    Issue communications to GPs reiterating that NICE does not recommend propranolol for anxiety and emphasising overdose risks.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 April 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of awareness among general practice doctors of the fatal overdose risks of Propranolol

Wider context from the report

“The evidence of the General Practitioner in this case was to the effect that prior to this death, neither he nor his colleagues were aware that Propranolol carried any significant risk of death through deliberate overdose. The evidence of the doctor in question was that because of this specific incident, there has been a change in their approach to prescribing of Propranolol at his GP surgery, with smaller quantities prescribed (1 to 10 patients who might be at risk of taking an overdose. Shortly after this incident (11 February 2020) there was, coincidentally, an article in the British Medical Journal in respect of Propranolol, ("Doctors and paramedics must be better prepared to deal with propranolol overdoses"). However, the doctor’s evidence in the inquest was that he did not believe that GPs generally were currently aware of the risk of Propranolol overdoses. The evidence from the Consultant Psychiatrist from the Community Mental Health Team was that they would not usually prescribe Propranolol, and he also considered that GPs may not be aware of the overdose risk posed by the drug. The inquest also heard from the toxicologist, who gave evidence that her anecdotal experience was that there had in recent years been a significant number of deaths caused by Propranolol overdoses. In the circumstances, I am concerned that doctors in General Practice may not be aware of the risks of fatal overdose from Propranolol, and that in the absence of greater awareness by GPs, the prescription of quantities of Propranolol to those at risk may cause future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to limit quantities of Propranolol prescribed to people at risk of overdose

Wider context from the report

“The evidence of the General Practitioner in this case was to the effect that prior to this death, neither he nor his colleagues were aware that Propranolol carried any significant risk of death through deliberate overdose. The evidence of the doctor in question was that because of this specific incident, there has been a change in their approach to prescribing of Propranolol at his GP surgery, with smaller quantities prescribed (1 to 10 patients who might be at risk of taking an overdose. Shortly after this incident (11 February 2020) there was, coincidentally, an article in the British Medical Journal in respect of Propranolol, ("Doctors and paramedics must be better prepared to deal with propranolol overdoses"). However, the doctor’s evidence in the inquest was that he did not believe that GPs generally were currently aware of the risk of Propranolol overdoses. The evidence from the Consultant Psychiatrist from the Community Mental Health Team was that they would not usually prescribe Propranolol, and he also considered that GPs may not be aware of the overdose risk posed by the drug. The inquest also heard from the toxicologist, who gave evidence that her anecdotal experience was that there had in recent years been a significant number of deaths caused by Propranolol overdoses. In the circumstances, I am concerned that doctors in General Practice may not be aware of the risks of fatal overdose from Propranolol, and that in the absence of greater awareness by GPs, the prescription of quantities of Propranolol to those at risk may cause future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to apply overdose-risk safeguards to medication prescribing; Medication quantity controls failing to prevent unsafe access to excessive amounts; Unsafe medication prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage NICE to strengthen cautions about the risks of propranolol use.

Verbatim wording from the response

“My colleagues from NHS England’s National Patient Safety Team have been engaging with NICE to flag the circumstances of Joshua’s death and inviting them to strengthen their cautions around the use of Propranolol.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 15 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage MHRA regarding communications about propranolol risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following our review of this case, it has also been agreed that NHS England will issue communications to GPs to reiterate that NICE do not recommend Propranolol as a treatment option for anxiety, and emphasising the risks involved in its administration, and we will do so as soon as practicable. NHS England are also engaging with the Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), who we understand are also considering some communications on this issue. NHS England are happy to update the Coroner in due course and once communications have been issued.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 15 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue communications to GPs reiterating that NICE does not recommend propranolol for anxiety and emphasising overdose risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following our review of this case, it has also been agreed that NHS England will issue communications to GPs to reiterate that NICE do not recommend Propranolol as a treatment option for anxiety, and emphasising the risks involved in its administration, and we will do so as soon as practicable. NHS England are also engaging with the Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), who we understand are also considering some communications on this issue. NHS England are happy to update the Coroner in due course and once communications have been issued.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 15 April 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026