PFD report

Peter Lawrence · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Aug 2016•Cambridgeshire and Peterborough

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to communicate less obvious suicide and self-harm risk factors
    Part of recurring concern: Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systemsPart of recurring concern: Unsafe interoperability between prison custody and healthcare procedures
  2. Lack of meaningful pastoral interaction with a dedicated custodial officer
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisonersPart of recurring concern: Unreliable Personal Officer scheme for identifying and monitoring prisoner vulnerability
  3. Failure to comprehensively record suicide and self-harm risk observations
    Part of recurring concern: Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systems
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate less obvious suicide and self-harm risk factors

Wider context from the report

“(1) The inquest heard a great deal of evidence relating to the process for identifying, managing and recording risk at the first point of contact between new prisoners and prison/healthcare staff. Mr Lawrence had not been in prison before and there was very little background information available to enable staff to identify less obvious risk factors, particularly in relation to the nature of the alleged offences. It was accepted in evidence that it was of particular importance at the initial screening to identify risk by other means and to record any observations in a comprehensive manner for future reference. HMP Peterborough has put in place a number of measures in recognition of the concern that suicide/self harm risk is identified at the earliest stage, even if no ACCT document is opened. The concern that risk factors may be missed or inadequately recorded has been addressed locally but there may be scope to expand awareness that individuals entering prison for the first time may be accompanied by only limited information. The situation is worsened where there is limited information available about the nature of the alleged offending. The identification and communication of less obvious risk factors is crucial; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systems; Unsafe interoperability between prison custody and healthcare procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of meaningful pastoral interaction with a dedicated custodial officer

Wider context from the report

“(2) The use of personal (or ‘custodial’) officers was identified as an important aspect of risk management. The jury identified the absence of interaction with a custodial officer in the current case to have been a missed opportunity to further identify and consider the risk of suicide/self harm. Again this has been addressed locally. The lack of meaningful interaction with a dedicated member of staff in a pastoral capacity, particularly for those in prison for the first time, gives rise to a concern that deaths may occur in other cases nationally. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisoners; Unreliable Personal Officer scheme for identifying and monitoring prisoner vulnerability.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to comprehensively record suicide and self-harm risk observations

Wider context from the report

“(1) The inquest heard a great deal of evidence relating to the process for identifying, managing and recording risk at the first point of contact between new prisoners and prison/healthcare staff. Mr Lawrence had not been in prison before and there was very little background information available to enable staff to identify less obvious risk factors, particularly in relation to the nature of the alleged offences. It was accepted in evidence that it was of particular importance at the initial screening to identify risk by other means and to record any observations in a comprehensive manner for future reference. HMP Peterborough has put in place a number of measures in recognition of the concern that suicide/self harm risk is identified at the earliest stage, even if no ACCT document is opened. The concern that risk factors may be missed or inadequately recorded has been addressed locally but there may be scope to expand awareness that individuals entering prison for the first time may be accompanied by only limited information. The situation is worsened where there is limited information available about the nature of the alleged offending. The identification and communication of less obvious risk factors is crucial; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to identify less obvious suicide and self-harm risk factors at initial screening

Wider context from the report

“(1) The inquest heard a great deal of evidence relating to the process for identifying, managing and recording risk at the first point of contact between new prisoners and prison/healthcare staff. Mr Lawrence had not been in prison before and there was very little background information available to enable staff to identify less obvious risk factors, particularly in relation to the nature of the alleged offences. It was accepted in evidence that it was of particular importance at the initial screening to identify risk by other means and to record any observations in a comprehensive manner for future reference. HMP Peterborough has put in place a number of measures in recognition of the concern that suicide/self harm risk is identified at the earliest stage, even if no ACCT document is opened. The concern that risk factors may be missed or inadequately recorded has been addressed locally but there may be scope to expand awareness that individuals entering prison for the first time may be accompanied by only limited information. The situation is worsened where there is limited information available about the nature of the alleged offending. The identification and communication of less obvious risk factors is crucial; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systems; Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.