PFD report

Shaun William Dewey · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 Nov 2019•Avon

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to reflect remand prisoners’ higher risk of self-harm or suicide in national safer-custody guidance
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably apply PSI 64/2011 mental-health risk guidancePart of recurring concern: Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systems
  2. Failure to highlight remand prisoners’ higher risk of self-harm or suicide on the ACCT document
    Part of recurring concern: Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systemsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes
  3. Failure to incorporate the higher risk of self-harm or suicide among remand prisoners into staff training
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Disseminated guidance identifying remand status as a suicide and self-harm risk factor.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 December 2019.
  2. Action

    Develop and include a revised ACCT process in the new prison-safety policy framework, incorporating evaluation feedback before national rollout.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 December 2019.
  3. Action

    Replace the existing safer-custody instruction with a policy framework and update risk and trigger lists using evidence on remand-status risks.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 December 2019.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to reflect remand prisoners’ higher risk of self-harm or suicide in national safer-custody guidance

Wider context from the report

“My concern is therefore whether the risk of remand prisoners being at higher risk of self-harm or suicide should be: • considered by those designing the training for staff; • a factor generally highlighted to those caring for prisoners including prison staff and healthcare teams that is both the mental and physical health teams. • a risk highlighted on the ACCT document or • reflected in any re-draft of PSI 64/2011 national guidance – “Management of prisoners at risk of harm to self, to others and from others (safer custody)” ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably apply PSI 64/2011 mental-health risk guidance; Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to highlight remand prisoners’ higher risk of self-harm or suicide on the ACCT document

Wider context from the report

“My concern is therefore whether the risk of remand prisoners being at higher risk of self-harm or suicide should be: • considered by those designing the training for staff; • a factor generally highlighted to those caring for prisoners including prison staff and healthcare teams that is both the mental and physical health teams. • a risk highlighted on the ACCT document or • reflected in any re-draft of PSI 64/2011 national guidance – “Management of prisoners at risk of harm to self, to others and from others (safer custody)” ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systems; Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to incorporate the higher risk of self-harm or suicide among remand prisoners into staff training

Wider context from the report

“My concern is therefore whether the risk of remand prisoners being at higher risk of self-harm or suicide should be: • considered by those designing the training for staff; • a factor generally highlighted to those caring for prisoners including prison staff and healthcare teams that is both the mental and physical health teams. • a risk highlighted on the ACCT document or • reflected in any re-draft of PSI 64/2011 national guidance – “Management of prisoners at risk of harm to self, to others and from others (safer custody)” ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to highlight the higher risk of self-harm or suicide among remand prisoners to prison and healthcare staff

Wider context from the report

“My concern is therefore whether the risk of remand prisoners being at higher risk of self-harm or suicide should be: • considered by those designing the training for staff; • a factor generally highlighted to those caring for prisoners including prison staff and healthcare teams that is both the mental and physical health teams. • a risk highlighted on the ACCT document or • reflected in any re-draft of PSI 64/2011 national guidance – “Management of prisoners at risk of harm to self, to others and from others (safer custody)” ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systems; Unreliable sharing of safety-critical risk information within prisons.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminated guidance identifying remand status as a suicide and self-harm risk factor.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you rightly point out, whilst Prison Service Instruction (PSI) 64/2011 ‘Safer Custody’ contains lists of identified risks and triggers for suicide and self-harm that include factors that are relevant to many remand prisoners (such as early days in custody), it does not mention remand status itself. However, we frequently supplement the list in the PSI with additional information for staff, and this has included references to the increased risk posed by remand prisoners. For instance, the April 2014 Prison and Probation Ombudsman learning bulletin, from which you have quoted in your report, was disseminated widely within prisons, and more recent guidance issued by our prison safety team and made available to staff on the HMPPS intranet includes remand status as a risk factor for suicide. Training based on this more recent guidance has also been provided to staff in a number of prisons.”

Source location

2019-0398-Response-from-Director-General-of-Prisons_Redacted-1
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and include a revised ACCT process in the new prison-safety policy framework, incorporating evaluation feedback before national rollout.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During 2020 we will be replacing PSI 64/2011 with a policy framework on prison safety, and as part of this process the lists of risks and triggers will be reviewed and updated. We will ensure that the evidence about the risks posed by remand status, which you have drawn to my attention, is used to inform that work. The new policy framework will include a new version of the Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) process designed to make the system easier to operate and improve the quality of care offered to prisoners. The new version of the form and associated guidance were piloted in ten establishments in 2019 and the initial feedback has been positive. We are currently considering the formal”

Source location

2019-0398-Response-from-Director-General-of-Prisons_Redacted-1
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Replace the existing safer-custody instruction with a policy framework and update risk and trigger lists using evidence on remand-status risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During 2020 we will be replacing PSI 64/2011 with a policy framework on prison safety, and as part of this process the lists of risks and triggers will be reviewed and updated. We will ensure that the evidence about the risks posed by remand status, which you have drawn to my attention, is used to inform that work. The new policy framework will include a new version of the Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) process designed to make the system easier to operate and improve the quality of care offered to prisoners. The new version of the form and associated guidance were piloted in ten establishments in 2019 and the initial feedback has been positive. We are currently considering the formal”

Source location

2019-0398-Response-from-Director-General-of-Prisons_Redacted-1
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provided staff training based on guidance recognising remand status as a suicide and self-harm risk factor.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you rightly point out, whilst Prison Service Instruction (PSI) 64/2011 ‘Safer Custody’ contains lists of identified risks and triggers for suicide and self-harm that include factors that are relevant to many remand prisoners (such as early days in custody), it does not mention remand status itself. However, we frequently supplement the list in the PSI with additional information for staff, and this has included references to the increased risk posed by remand prisoners. For instance, the April 2014 Prison and Probation Ombudsman learning bulletin, from which you have quoted in your report, was disseminated widely within prisons, and more recent guidance issued by our prison safety team and made available to staff on the HMPPS intranet includes remand status as a risk factor for suicide. Training based on this more recent guidance has also been provided to staff in a number of prisons.”

Source location

2019-0398-Response-from-Director-General-of-Prisons_Redacted-1
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise suicide and self-harm prevention training and update its risk-and-trigger recognition module to reflect the new policy framework and ACCT changes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“evaluation report and expect to make some further changes before the national rollout. I will ensure that your point about the need to bring attention to the risks associated with remand status is considered as we do so. We will also be revising the Introduction to Suicide and Self Harm Prevention training (a course that is undertaken by all staff with prisoner contact) to reflect and support the new policy framework and changes to ACCT. Again, we will use this opportunity to ensure that the module on recognising risks and triggers is reviewed and updated.”

Source location

2019-0398-Response-from-Director-General-of-Prisons_Redacted-1
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026