PFD report

Rita Maureen TAYLOR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Jan 2023•Milton Keynes

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Insufficient ambulance service resources for emergency response demand
    Part of recurring concern: Delays in ambulance attendancePart of recurring concern: Insufficient ambulance service capacity for emergency calls
  2. Failure to upgrade emergency incident categorisation when clinical deterioration warranted a higher priority
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deteriorationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable ambulance call triage and re-triage
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient ambulance service resources for emergency response demand

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that there are insufficient ambulance service resources to meet the needs of the City of Milton Keynes. The first call to the 111 service was made at 10.28 and the call was deemed a category 3 incident. [At] that time there were "no available resources to send." At 11.12 a 999 call was made by a passer by but there were still "no available resources ". At 12.16 there was a further 999 call. The incident remained a category three and was "still pending in the dispatch queue waiting for resources to become available ". At 12.41 a call was made to Mrs. Taylor’s location but there were " still no available resources to send". At 13.12 A further 999 call was made " awaiting resources to become available" At 13.48 Patient location was called she was now in and out of consciousness and although she remained a category 3 an audit of the call decided that she should have been upgraded to a category 2 or 1. "Still no available resources". At 14.42 further 999 call but again "no available resources". At 15.25 Case reviewed to a category 2. At 16.29 An ambulance was dispatched arriving at 17.15. This was 6hours 47 minutes after the original call and 1hour 49 minutes after category 2 upgrade. Mrs Taylor arrived at the hospital at 17.57 and when assessed in the emergency department her Glasgow Coma score was recorded as 3.She died later the same day. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in ambulance attendance; Insufficient ambulance service capacity for emergency calls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to upgrade emergency incident categorisation when clinical deterioration warranted a higher priority

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that there are insufficient ambulance service resources to meet the needs of the City of Milton Keynes. The first call to the 111 service was made at 10.28 and the call was deemed a category 3 incident. [At] that time there were "no available resources to send." At 11.12 a 999 call was made by a passer by but there were still "no available resources ". At 12.16 there was a further 999 call. The incident remained a category three and was "still pending in the dispatch queue waiting for resources to become available ". At 12.41 a call was made to Mrs. Taylor’s location but there were " still no available resources to send". At 13.12 A further 999 call was made " awaiting resources to become available" At 13.48 Patient location was called she was now in and out of consciousness and although she remained a category 3 an audit of the call decided that she should have been upgraded to a category 2 or 1. "Still no available resources". At 14.42 further 999 call but again "no available resources". At 15.25 Case reviewed to a category 2. At 16.29 An ambulance was dispatched arriving at 17.15. This was 6hours 47 minutes after the original call and 1hour 49 minutes after category 2 upgrade. Mrs Taylor arrived at the hospital at 17.57 and when assessed in the emergency department her Glasgow Coma score was recorded as 3.She died later the same day. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration; Unreliable ambulance call triage and re-triage.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.